Check out our first Huawei P20 Pro benchmark results
The Huawei P20 and P20 Pro debuted yesterday and their Leica cameras were understandably met with a lot of excitement. Performance wasn't so much in focus as the Kirin 970 that powers them was introduced back in October with the Mate 10 series.
Huawei P20 ProStill, we though to give the SoC a test to see how it fares on the new taller screens of slightly higher resolution.
The Kirin 970 premiered at IFA last fall. It is built on the 10 nm process by HiSilicion, native Huawei division. The chip is housing an octa-core CPU - four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz for performance and four Cortex-A53 at 1.8 GHz for power efficiency. The GPU onboard is Mali-G72 MP12, while the RAM on the P20 Pro that we used for the test is 6 GB.
Looking at the benchmark results, the Huawei P20 Pro sits quietly in the lower bottom of the list, which for this purpose, includes only devices with the latest chips from Exynos, Qualcomm and HiSilicon. Keep in mind that the P20 Pro is still not officially on sale so once its software is finalized the gap to the leaders will probably be a bit smaller.
The CPU differences between the latest Exynos 9810 and Qualcomm 845 and the 6-months old Kirin 970 in the CPU tests are more pronounced, but the compound tests came out pretty close.
That would suggest that while no longer the most powerful around the Huawei chip has aged well and the P20 duo is not likely to find itself out of its depth no matter how hard a task you will throw at it. Still, benchmarks are one thing and real life performance is often another, so we'll reserve any verdicts for when the reviews are complete.
GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S9+
8883 -
Samsung Galaxy S9
8830 -
Sony Xperia XZ2
8466 -
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6783 -
Huawei P20 Pro
6679 -
Huawei Mate 10
6625
GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S9+
3771 -
Samsung Galaxy S9
3759 -
Sony Xperia XZ2
2454 -
Huawei P20 Pro
1907 -
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1902 -
Huawei Mate 10
1882
AnTuTu 7
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia XZ2
259244 -
Samsung Galaxy S9
250156 -
Samsung Galaxy S9+
246660 -
Huawei Mate 10
214037 -
Huawei P20 Pro
209884
Basemark OS 2.0
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia XZ2
3859 -
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3425 -
Huawei Mate 10
3415 -
Samsung Galaxy S9
3382 -
Samsung Galaxy S9+
3354 -
Huawei P20 Pro
3252
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia XZ2
82 -
Samsung Galaxy S9+
74 -
Samsung Galaxy S9
73 -
Huawei P20 Pro
66 -
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
65 -
Huawei Mate 10
65
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia XZ2
59 -
Huawei P20 Pro
55 -
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
55 -
Samsung Galaxy S9
45 -
Samsung Galaxy S9+
45 -
Huawei Mate 10
43
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia XZ2
55 -
Samsung Galaxy S9+
47 -
Samsung Galaxy S9
46 -
Huawei P20 Pro
40 -
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 -
Huawei Mate 10
38
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia XZ2
51 -
Huawei P20 Pro
37 -
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
35 -
Samsung Galaxy S9
24 -
Samsung Galaxy S9+
24 -
Huawei Mate 10
23
Related
Reader comments
- Anonymous
- 03 Jun 2018
- 4X{
hahaha true
- Regdemo
- 12 May 2018
- Dkw
Check out the benchmark results of kirin 980 it scores 3.56 lakh 😨
- AnonD-510098
- 03 Apr 2018
- MAf
When the Kirin 980 comes out in the Mate 11 it will wreck any exynos chip available