Exynos Galaxy S10 visits GeekBench, still behind the iPhone XS in single-core test

George, 19 January 2019

The Samsung Galaxy S10 has been spotted on GeekBench and the numbers are in. This time, it's the Exynos 9820 variant for South Korea (SM-G973N), and there are notable differences with the previously seen results from the S10+ in Snapdragon 855 trim.

The single-core result, in particular, is far ahead of any other chip in the Android world - the current Kirin 980 (around the 3400s) and Snapdragon 845 (ballpark is in 2400s) are no match for the next-gen Exynos, and early Snapdragon 855 figures are much lower too (3400-3550 depending on who you ask). In fact, the older Exynos 9810 gets closest, posting single core results upwards of 3600 and into the high 3700s under the right conditions. Even so, the iPhone XS remains out of reach.

GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone XS Max
    4777
  • Samsung Galaxy S10 (E9820)
    4382
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    3771
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    3642
  • Samsung Galaxy S10+ (S855)
    3413
  • Huawei Mate 20 Pro
    3291
  • Huawei Mate 20
    3284
  • Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
    2429
  • OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
    2376

The multi-core performance isn't as impressive, though still respectable. In this scenario, however, the Exynos Galaxy S10 is bested by the Kirin-packing Mate 20s and its own Snapdragon sibling.

GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone XS Max
    11432
  • Samsung Galaxy S10+ (S855)
    10256
  • Huawei Mate 20
    9793
  • Huawei Mate 20 Pro
    9712
  • Samsung Galaxy S10 (E9820)
    9570
  • Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
    9065
  • Samsung Galaxy Note9
    9026
  • OnePlus 6T McLaren Edition
    9005
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    8883

With the Exynos 9810, Samsung focused more on providing higher single-core performance that competing designs in the Android realm and with the 9820 that push continues. Apple's Bionic still sets the trends in raw single-core power, but Samsung is quickly catching up.

Source


Related

Reader comments

  • AnonD-784107
  • 26 Jan 2019
  • pY$

Your comments are so funny you clearly have never used a pixel device. I know people running a pixel 1 and it still as fast when was taken out the box from New.

  • Recow
  • 24 Jan 2019
  • MsU

Is it possible to install android OS on an IPhone and then start this test ? or the other way around ? Does a lighter OS have effect on the benchmarks and if it does how much ? I remember flashing lighter custom OS on android phone, this wo...

  • Nghtmare
  • 21 Jan 2019
  • pKy

Finally someone with common sense. iPhone is a basic OS compared to Android

Popular articles

More

Popular devices

Electric Vehicles

More