HTC One A9 review: Rejuvenation
Rejuvenation
Performance
HTC One A9 is the first smartphone to utilize the Snapdragon 617 SoC, which upgrades the mid-range Snapdragon 615 with the ability to use all 8 Cortex-A53 CPU cores at once and bumps the RAM frequency. The connectivity suite got faster Wi-Fi, support for LTE Cat.7, Bluetooth 4.1 and Quick Charge 3.0.
HTC One A9 is not a flagship device, so we didn't expect flagship results. By choosing a mid-tier chipset HTC made a clear statement the A9 won't be fighting the top of the shelf devices, but rather the upper midranges.
GeekBench 3 puts to the test the multi-core performance of the octa-core processor of the One A9. It's a quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A53 actually, but unlike the Snapdragon 615 chips, the S617 can use all of those cores simultaneously. The final result is a noticeable performance increase over the S615 devices (Oppo R1x and R7, vivo X5Pro), while the A9 is also very close to the hexa-core CPU of the Snapdragon 808 (LG G4, Xiaomi Mi 4c) and the Helio X10 chip performance (Xperia M5).
GeekBench 3
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6
5215 -
Meizu MX5
5110 -
OnePlus 2
4429 -
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
3796 -
HTC One M9
3761 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
3554 -
LG G4
3509 -
Huawei P8
3380 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
3321 -
HTC One A9
3209 -
Apple iPhone 6
2924 -
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
2856 -
Oppo R7
2683 -
Oppo R1x
2507 -
ZTE Nubia Z9 mini
2298 -
vivo X5Pro
2241 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
1460
AnTuTu 5 gauges CPU, GPU and memory performance and the HTC One A9 outs mid-range scores, as expected. It does the same as the Snapdragon 801-packing Xperia Z3 Compact and the Helio X10-powered Xperia M5. The S808 and S810 chips are obviously better.
AnTuTu 5
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6
69396 -
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
61481 -
HTC One M9
51427 -
Huawei P8
50876 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
50875 -
LG G4
49295 -
Meizu MX5
48915 -
OnePlus 2
47207 -
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
46566 -
HTC One A9
40631 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
38786 -
ZTE Nubia Z9 mini
35582 -
vivo X5Pro
34649 -
Oppo R1x
30187 -
Oppo R7 (retail)
29452 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
21581
Another well-known compound test is the BaseMark OS II 2.0 app, which takes into consideration the CPU, GPU and RAM, but also the web and OS performances. The HTC One A9 once again came in the middle of the chart, outing similar results as the Helio X10 fellas.
Basemark OS 2.0
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6
1674 -
OnePlus 2
1622 -
LG G4
1584 -
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
1440 -
HTC One M9
1365 -
Meizu MX5
1252 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
1233 -
Huawei P8
1112 -
HTC One A9
944 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
860 -
Oppo R7 (retail)
757 -
Oppo R1x
753 -
vivo X5Pro
738 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
569 -
ZTE Nubia Z9 mini
282
Its single-core performance is quite mediocre, but so are all Cortex-A53 cores out there.
Basemark OS 2.0 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6
6306 -
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
6234 -
LG G4
5871 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
5739 -
OnePlus 2
5301 -
HTC One M9
4688 -
Huawei P8
3684 -
Meizu MX5
3262 -
vivo X5Pro
2767 -
HTC One A9
2753 -
ZTE Nubia Z9 mini
2676 -
Oppo R7 (retail)
2452 -
Oppo R1x
2177 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
2065 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
1861
Fortunately, the true-octa core power shines at the multi-core test.
Basemark OS 2.0 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6
26799 -
Huawei P8
23676 -
Meizu MX5
22976 -
HTC One A9
19160 -
HTC One M9
18047 -
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
17770 -
LG G4
17739 -
OnePlus 2
16798 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
14276 -
ZTE Nubia Z9 mini
9979 -
Oppo R7 (retail)
9755 -
vivo X5Pro
8733 -
Oppo R1x
8683 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
7891 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
7492
Now, about the graphic capabilities. The Adreno 405 GPU has never been known of its superb performance - it was designed to serve the mid-class after all. The one in the HTC One A9 does not support Quad HD resolutions, so video playback and capturing are out of the question. And while the Adreno 405 will do awesome on 720p screens, the one in the HTC One A9 is a 1080p one, which should somewhat lower the performance.
So, both the offscreen and onscreen tests reveal the One A9 is a mediocre achiever at best, putting it next to its S615 siblings (Oppo R7, R1x, vivo X5 Pro, Nubia Z9 mini). This isn't bad, but it means you should not expect smooth performance of heavy 3D games.
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
25 -
Samsung Galaxy S6
24 -
HTC One M9
23 -
OnePlus 2
22 -
Apple iPhone 6
17.7 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
15 -
LG G4
14.9 -
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
11.8 -
Meizu MX5
10 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
8.4 -
HTC One A9
6.4 -
Oppo R7 (retail)
5.9 -
ZTE Nubia Z9 mini
5.9 -
vivo X5Pro
5.8 -
Huawei P8
5.4 -
Oppo R1x
4.9 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
1.8
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
39 -
Apple iPhone 6
29.2 -
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
25.4 -
HTC One M9
24 -
OnePlus 2
22 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
15 -
Samsung Galaxy S6
14 -
Oppo R1x
9.6 -
Meizu MX5
9.5 -
LG G4
9.4 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
8.7 -
HTC One A9
6.7 -
Oppo R7 (retail)
5.9 -
vivo X5Pro
5.8 -
ZTE Nubia Z9 mini
5.8 -
Huawei P8
5.7 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
3.9
The latest GFX 3.1 tests and the BaseMark ES3.1 bench based on the OpenGL ES 3.1 reveal the same findings.
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
18 -
OnePlus 2
16 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
10 -
Meizu MX5
4.8 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
4.5 -
HTC One A9
3.8 -
Huawei P8
3.4
GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
38 -
OnePlus 2
16 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
9.7 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
4.9 -
Meizu MX5
4.7 -
Huawei P8
4.3 -
HTC One A9
4
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
Higher is better
-
HTC One M9
409 -
Samsung Galaxy S6
311 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
248 -
HTC One A9
132
Finally, the BaseMark X GPU test also puts the HTC One A9 behind the Xperia M5 and Meizu MX5, which are running on MediaTek's Helio X10 (with PowerVR G6200 GPU).
Basemark X
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S6
27169 -
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
23703 -
OnePlus 2
21937 -
HTC One M9
19848 -
Apple iPhone 6
17054 -
LG G4
15090 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
12096 -
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
12080 -
Meizu MX5
10403 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
7780 -
HTC One A9
6617 -
Huawei P8
6307 -
Oppo R7 (retail)
5382 -
vivo X5Pro
5091 -
ZTE Nubia Z9 mini
5003 -
Oppo R1x
4018 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
1897
A mid-ranger usually does average on the web benchmarks and so is the HTC One A9. The Chrome's JavaScript performance (the Kraken test) and the overall web performance (the Browsermark 2.1) are about the average.
Kraken 1.1
Lower is better
-
LG G4
4085 -
Samsung Galaxy S6
4154 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
4506 -
Apple iPhone 6
4710 -
HTC One M9
5500 -
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
6480 -
OnePlus 2
6808 -
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
7868 -
HTC One A9
11069 -
Oppo R7 (retail)
11257 -
Meizu MX5
11414 -
Huawei P8
11867 -
vivo X5Pro
12525 -
Oppo R1x
12826 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
13083 -
ZTE Nubia Z9 mini
18583 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
25088
BrowserMark 2.1
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 6
3153 -
Samsung Galaxy S6
2718 -
Xiaomi Mi 4c
2113 -
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
2099 -
OnePlus 2
2055 -
LG G4
1990 -
HTC One M9
1681 -
HTC One A9
1562 -
vivo X5Pro
1509 -
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
1500 -
Meizu MX5
1471 -
Oppo R7 (retail)
1433 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
1203 -
Samsung Galaxy A5
1171 -
ZTE Nubia Z9 mini
767 -
Huawei P8
764 -
Oppo R1x
627
Regardless of whether you opt for the HTC One A9 with 2 or 3 GB of RAM, you'll get a mid-range smartphone to the bone. Its processing power is indeed very impressive, but its GPU is an average performer and may struggle in future top-tier 3D games.
Reader comments
- Darshana From Lanka
- 31 Jan 2021
- v{u
This is my 3 Years of Experience 1 - performance: Perfect. 2 - battery: was good after a one or two year it keeps waking up only for 6 hours or less. 3 - camera: Perfect ( rear and front ) Must-Know Fact Is this mobile is so handy ( sm...
- AnonD-392500
- 16 Nov 2017
- 6p$
Why buy A9 while 10evo is better than this in every aspect?
- Mmm
- 14 Jul 2017
- L6V
Htc one a9 has a very very very poor battry.