LG K3
- h
- haresh chauhan
- vwe
- 12 Feb 2017
good phone
- D
- AnonD-637026
- jBu
- 23 Jan 2017
K3 is plenty fast within limited specs for a low end.
Camera quality is inferior to a potato.
3gb of usable internal memory is not adequate for today's bloated apps. Not SDXC compatible. 32gb can only hold so much. Call quality is is quite alright. LED flash beats no LED flash for a low end.Nice and bright. UI is easy to navigate. Battery life is manageable. Charging the battery is a long process unfortunate. It's a better than nothing or better than other low ends with lesser features type of phone.
- R
- RachelW
- 3DR
- 09 Jan 2017
sim - nano
- D
- AnonD-624392
- gwE
- 24 Dec 2016
Sebstin, 12 Aug 2016How much extra does it cost to increase RAM to 2GB, camera ... moreLook at the price tag of K10
- D
- AnonD-617480
- jBu
- 05 Dec 2016
Used the LS450 for some time. Can only really compare it to its 2014 predecessor, LS740.
Only using it as a secondary media focused device than a phone as it lacks certain features. Just will comment on a few things.
Wtf two microphone holes on top and bottom? Didn't expect that. Normally the 3.5mm Jack is on the top (replaced with a mic hole) but is placed at the bottom next to the MicroUSB port.
No color indicator LED?(reason why I am not using it as a main phone) I want to see if my phone is done charging at a distance. Been noticing the removal of this feature on a few LG smartphones 2015-2016
Main Camera with stock LG camera app in Stills mode is okay within the low end spectrum. Youre not to expect low light/high ISO sensitivity, that's a flagship phone feature. Has a flash, better than low ends with no flash.
Video mode, better than LS740 albiet less options. Has no autofocus which to me is a good thing. LG smartphones with autofocus I had in the past had the infamous breathing autofocus issue, particularly the LS740 also having a very horribly slow autofocus.
Only has a 720p video mode, wish it had lesser widescreen resolutions down to 240 considering the limited maximum expandable storage of 32gb.
Plays Pokémon GO just fine within it's low end limitations, no AR. Doesn't crash within a minute like the LS740. Every time I played that on the latter it crashes within a minute plus is laggy if heavy on animation. Haven't yet played PoGo with LS450 in an area with an extreme amount of animations. Will comment on that later.
- G
- GUESS WHO
- N9p
- 01 Dec 2016
i think its a smart phone considering you can do anything on it.. good for social media and its cheap:)
- c
- cool
- 3DR
- 28 Nov 2016
excellent phone for very little money, shame about the screen though.
- ?
- Anonymous
- mye
- 26 Nov 2016
AnonD-109585, 12 Aug 2016wont be long now before LG meets up with HTC down "there"..... moreThe lg k3 is a basic and cheap phone you get what you pay for they have realised the lg g5 which is a top of the end phone the specs yeah spec's aren't very good I agree but remember the price of the phone
- T
- THICKLADY
- N9p
- 24 Nov 2016
i think it is a good device for it price
- D
- AnonD-610840
- 3aG
- 16 Nov 2016
This phone takes a Nano sim not a Micro sim as stated in the description
- w
- we
- 3DR
- 31 Oct 2016
we just got these instore. three of them.
There's not a chance I'll be selling these.
Not a chance, charles dance.
- G
- Ghillie
- pTd
- 28 Oct 2016
When the camara is out, I had to registrated him every time pin and puc codes. How can I change it.
- D
- AnonD-572889
- rLr
- 27 Oct 2016
FWVGA..? Resolution is too low.. but design is good.
- D
- AnonD-150002
- frj
- 25 Oct 2016
You dont think what?
- M
- Mei
- MkX
- 23 Oct 2016
This phone doesnt have a good camera either, yet its already in a Marshmallow.
- M
- Miss K
- N9p
- 13 Oct 2016
This device isnt all that bad people that are commenting about specs etc dont realize that not every one can afford a s7
its a smart phone with the basic features its affordable and does its job great value for money
- s
- skiller
- N9p
- 17 Sep 2016
best phone for its price
- s
- sujohn.cena
- PEq
- 17 Aug 2016
Not bad. Low price and low quality of phone.
- A
- Aadrian
- 3YQ
- 16 Aug 2016
It's a competitor for the Alcatel Tru priced at 29 dollars.
- S
- Sebstin
- kqy
- 15 Aug 2016
Anonymous, 13 Aug 2016This is extreme low-end phone so .. no need for that specs ... moreI dont think any phone out there with those specs with 4.5-4.7" form factor (except 1-2 phones)..