Meizu MX4 Pro review: Sharpened up

Sharpened up

GSMArena team, 13 January 2015.

Octa-core processing

The Meizu MX4 Pro ditches the MediaTek chipset of its predecessor and has instead opted for the Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430, built around a 20nm processor and ARM's big.LITTLE architecture. It has four Cortex-A15 cores clocked at 2GHz and four Cortex-A7's at 1.5GHz each. Graphics are handled by the Mali T628 MP6/600MHz GPU and there's a stocky 3 gigs of RAM.

The CPU performance of the Exynos chip starts off impressively. GeekBench 3 ranks the MX4 Pro at second place among the many phones in the chart, interestingly just behind the Meizu MX4.

AnTuTu 5 gives the MX4 Pro a third place behind the Snapdragon 805-yellding Motorola Nexus 6 and the Samsung Galaxy Alpha, the latter using the same Exynos 5 Octa chip as the subject of this review.

Basemark OS II is where the Meizu MX4 Pro loses serious ground. In the overall test the MX4 Pro only makes it to the bottom of the table but is still above the Samsung Galaxy Alpha, the Huawei Ascend Mate7 and Meizu's own MX4.

Single and multi-core performance is rated in last and second-to-last place, though.

GeekBench 3

Higher is better

  • Meizu MX4
    3556
  • Meizu MX4 Pro
    3386
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    3285
  • Samsung Galaxy Alpha
    3214
  • Oppo Find 7
    3178
  • Xiaomi Mi 4
    3175
  • Huawei Ascend Mate7
    3165
  • Oppo Find 7a
    3093
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    2925
  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    2884
  • Oppo N3
    2704
  • OnePlus One
    2663
  • LG G3 - EU version
    2563

AnTuTu 5

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy Alpha
    51905
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    49803
  • Meizu MX4 Pro
    48489
  • Meizu MX4
    46922
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    46824
  • Huawei Ascend Mate7
    41510
  • LG G3 - EU version
    39905
  • Oppo N3
    39245

Basemark OS II

Higher is better

  • Motorola Nexus 6
    1509
  • Xiaomi Mi 4
    1324
  • Oppo N3
    1280
  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    1222
  • Oppo Find 7
    1212
  • OnePlus One
    1196
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    1181
  • LG G3 - EU version
    1126
  • Oppo Find 7a
    1057
  • Meizu MX4 Pro
    922
  • Samsung Galaxy Alpha
    915
  • Huawei Ascend Mate7
    830
  • Meizu MX4
    695

Basemark OS II (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    4031
  • Oppo Find 7
    2606
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    2588
  • Oppo Find 7a
    2580
  • Samsung Galaxy Alpha
    2579
  • Xiaomi Mi 4
    2573
  • Oppo N3
    2417
  • Huawei Ascend Mate7
    2334
  • OnePlus One
    2213
  • LG G3 - EU version
    2213
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    1967
  • Meizu MX4 Pro
    1891
  • Meizu MX4
    1729

Basemark OS II (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy Alpha
    15096
  • Huawei Ascend Mate7
    15012
  • Meizu MX4
    12268
  • Oppo Find 7
    10391
  • Oppo Find 7a
    10256
  • OnePlus One
    10234
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    9915
  • LG G3 - EU version
    9611
  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    9604
  • Xiaomi Mi 4
    9508
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    9446
  • Oppo N3
    9320
  • Meizu MX4 Pro
    7399

The next installment of tests measures the GPU performance or in other words gaming and video playback. With its Mali GPU, the Meizu MX4 Pro didn't really crush the boards. The less-intensive T-Rex test showed an almost stutter-free 26 fps on the offscreen 1080p run. The on-screen version however uses the native resolution of 1536 x 2560px, resulting in a less impressive 17fps.

The Manhattan test is about twice as taxing and we got half the framerate compared to T-Rex. Both framerates are consistent with many of the MX4 Pro's direct rivals but still nowhere near a smooth 30fps.

Finally, Basemark X shows its own score for gaming prowess. The MX4 Pro edged out its predecessor but failed to match the heavyweights in the smartphone space.

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    44.6
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    41.7
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    38.9
  • Samsung Galaxy Alpha
    31.3
  • Oppo Find 7a
    28.4
  • OnePlus One
    28.3
  • Oppo Find 7
    28
  • Xiaomi Mi 4
    27.6
  • LG G3 - EU version
    27.2
  • Meizu MX4 Pro
    26
  • Meizu MX4
    22.7
  • Huawei Ascend Mate7
    16.4

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy Alpha
    48.4
  • OnePlus One
    30
  • Oppo Find 7a
    28.8
  • Xiaomi Mi 4
    28.2
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    27.4
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    26.4
  • Meizu MX4
    21.3
  • LG G3 - EU version
    20.5
  • Oppo Find 7
    19.9
  • Huawei Ascend Mate7
    17.4
  • Meizu MX4 Pro
    17

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    18.6
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    18.6
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    18.5
  • Samsung Galaxy Alpha
    13.4
  • Meizu MX4 Pro
    13
  • OnePlus One
    12.1
  • Xiaomi Mi 4
    11.6
  • LG G3 - EU version
    11.4
  • Oppo Find 7a
    11.4
  • Oppo Find 7
    11.1
  • Huawei Ascend Mate7
    8
  • Meizu MX4
    7.9

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy Alpha
    25.3
  • OnePlus One
    12.9
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    11.9
  • Oppo Find 7a
    11.4
  • Xiaomi Mi 4
    11.3
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    11.2
  • Huawei Ascend Mate7
    8.5
  • Meizu MX4 Pro
    7.8
  • Meizu MX4
    7.4
  • LG G3 - EU version
    7.2
  • Oppo Find 7
    6.7

Basemark X

Higher is better

  • Motorola Nexus 6
    20901
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    18684
  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    18297
  • Oppo Find 7
    14968
  • OnePlus One
    13129
  • LG G3 - EU version
    11552
  • Samsung Galaxy Alpha
    11065
  • Oppo N3
    10168
  • Meizu MX4 Pro
    9111
  • Meizu MX4
    8324
  • Huawei Ascend Mate7
    6501

Finally, we come to the JavaScript benchmark Kraken 1.1 by Mozilla. It evaluates the JavaScript performance by the web browser. It relies not only on the hardware under the hood, but also on the software optimization made by the manufacturer. The Meizu MX4 Pro ranks last in this test.

Kraken 1.1

Lower is better

  • Apple iPhone 6 Plus
    4650
  • Samsung Galaxy Alpha
    4911
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4
    5351
  • Huawei Ascend Mate7
    5567
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    6088
  • Xiaomi Mi 4
    6137
  • Oppo Find 7
    6363
  • Oppo N3
    6460
  • Oppo Find 7a
    6660
  • LG G3 - EU version
    6987
  • OnePlus One
    7008
  • Meizu MX4
    9408
  • Meizu MX4 Pro
    10193

While synthetic benchmarks can give you a pretty good idea of what to expect from a given hardware rig, we wouldn't go as far as saying that it's truly applicable as a practical measurement for recent high-end smartphones and their performance.

Each of the phones in the tables above offer outstanding performance without hiccups or stutters in just about any scenario you'd use them for.

Reader comments

  • mikhu
  • 18 Dec 2019
  • 61w

on ebay

  • alver
  • 14 Jan 2019
  • fuZ

My phone was broken display how i can get new one i am in Tanzanian

  • baumpate
  • 20 Mar 2016
  • ngJ

Any hint what to do? Sometimes wlan AND bluetooth don't work at all. While searching, phone is getting hot an hotter. Sometimes wlan and bluetooth start working correctly (often after battery was empty) Very frustrating, although a great phone ..... ...