Moto Z Droid review: Birth of a new successor

Birth of a new successor

GSMArena team, 29 July 2016.

Synthetic Benchmarks

The Moto Z features Motorola's 'Mobile Computing System' which joins a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 CPU (dual-core 2.15 GHz Kyro & dual-core 1.6 GHz Kyro) and Adreno 520 with a Natural Language Processor and Contextual Computing Processor. There is also a healthy 4GB of LPDDR4 RAM.

Likewise, the Snapdragon 820 is quite the improvement over the CPU found in the Moto Z's predecessor: the Moto X Pure Edition (A.K.A. Moto X Style), which sported a 6-core Snapdragon 808 CPU.

Moto Z Droid Edition Review

The Snapdragon 820 is found in several flagship phones this year like the LG G5, Samsung Galaxy S7 (U.S. models), and HTC 10. All of these phones will perform similarly with some phones perhaps outperforming others with different speeds of RAM or internal storage speeds for reading and writing.

We've also tossed in a couple of phones that use alternative-CPUs like the Samsung Galaxy S7 (Exynos 8890) and the Huawei P9 (HiSilicon Kirin 955).

Starting off with single-core power test, the iPhone remains at the top in these tests. It's no wonder the iPhone 6S only has a dual-core CPU, that's likely all it needs to power through its super-optimized software. Behind the iPhone are three Snapdragon 820 CPU powered phones. The Moto Z Droid tied with the Snapdragon Galaxy S7 edge, yielding the same score.

GeekBench 3 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 6s Plus
    2527
  • OnePlus 3
    2383
  • HTC 10
    2368
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    2345
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
    2345
  • Sony Xperia X Performance
    2273
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
    2151
  • Huawei P9
    1819
  • Huawei Nexus 6P
    1363

When it comes to multi-core power, the Exynos-powered Galaxy S7 remains at the top, followed by Huawei's own silicon (Kirin 955 CPU) found in the P9. The Snapdragon 820-powered handsets come after both Huawei and Samsung's CPU offerings.

GeekBench 3 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
    6600
  • Huawei P9
    6558
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    5566
  • OnePlus 3
    5520
  • Sony Xperia X Performance
    5460
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
    5420
  • HTC 10
    5257
  • Huawei Nexus 6P
    4539
  • Apple iPhone 6s Plus
    4413
  • Moto X Pure Edition
    3433

Basemark II 2.0 adds RAM and storage tests on top of CPU ones to give a better indication of overall performance. The Moto Z Droid posts excellent numbers, comfortably ahead of the other Snapdragon 820 contenders.

Basemark OS 2.0

Higher is better

  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    2690
  • OnePlus 3
    2365
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
    2352
  • Apple iPhone 6s Plus
    2261
  • Sony Xperia X Performance
    2179
  • Huawei P9
    2068
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
    2050
  • Huawei Nexus 6P
    2040
  • HTC 10
    1839

The Moto Z Droid is well ahead of other Snapdragon 820 competitors when it comes to Antutu 6. However, the HTC 10 is well ahead and the Moto Z itself. The alternative CPUs find themselves at the bottom of this list of benchmarks.

AnTuTu 6

Higher is better

  • HTC 10
    154031
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    151619
  • OnePlus 3
    141764
  • Apple iPhone 6s Plus
    137420
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
    132849
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
    129229
  • Sony Xperia X Performance
    116217
  • Huawei P9
    98069
  • Huawei Nexus 6P
    89345

Next up with graphics, the Moto Z carries the Adreno 530 for hardware-intensive rendering, as do the other Snapdragon 820 phones of the bunch. The offscreen test ensures an even playing field for devices that might differ in screen resolution. The Moto Z Droid performed right at the top and scored the same as the Snapdragon variant of the Galaxy S7 edge.

The other Snapdragon contenders did just as well with a marginal difference. The Exynos-powered S7 edge is right behind the Snapdragon 820 pack. Qualcomm's CPU setup shines here in the gaming and graphic-intensive department.

Keep in mind that onscreen tests will yield different results. The Xperia X Performance, OnePlus 3, and iPhone 6S Plus all have significantly fewer pixels that need to be pushed around. These devices, in turn, will perform better than the QHD offerings.

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    32
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
    32
  • HTC 10
    31
  • OnePlus 3
    31
  • Sony Xperia X Performance
    30
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
    29
  • Apple iPhone 6s Plus
    27.9
  • Huawei Nexus 6P
    17
  • Huawei P9
    10
  • Moto X Pure Edition
    10

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Sony Xperia X Performance
    31
  • OnePlus 3
    30
  • Apple iPhone 6s Plus
    27.9
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    18
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
    16
  • HTC 10
    15
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
    15
  • Huawei P9
    11
  • Huawei Nexus 6P
    11
  • Moto X Pure Edition
    5.6

GFX 3.1 Car scene (offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    19
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
    18
  • HTC 10
    18
  • OnePlus 3
    18
  • Sony Xperia X Performance
    17
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
    15
  • Huawei P9
    6.5

GFX 3.1 Car scene (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus 3
    18
  • Sony Xperia X Performance
    18
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    12
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
    10
  • HTC 10
    9.9
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
    7.8
  • Huawei P9
    7.1

Basemark X

Higher is better

  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    36322
  • OnePlus 3
    32715
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
    32160
  • HTC 10
    28882
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
    28480
  • Sony Xperia X Performance
    28450
  • Huawei Nexus 6P
    22825
  • Huawei P9
    16942
  • Moto X Pure Edition
    14598

Basemark ES 3.1 measures the phone's OpenGL graphic performance. The results are a mixed bag. The iPhone 6S Plus leads the pack with the Exynos-powered S7 edge behind a large gap. The Moto Z comes in right after the Exynos S7 edge. The X Performance, OnePlus 3, and Snapdragon-powered S7 edge all scored lower despite having a similar CPU setup.

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal

Higher is better

  • Apple iPhone 6s Plus
    916
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
    733
  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    648
  • OnePlus 3
    625
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
    624
  • Sony Xperia X Performance
    551
  • Huawei Nexus 6P
    504
  • Huawei P9
    341

The older Basemark X performance test yielded top-of-the-chart results for the Moto Z Droid. The Exynos powered S7 edge also is just behind, then the rest of the Snapdragon 820 devices come after, and the Kirin 955-powered Huawei P9 came in dead last.

Remember that Basemark tests take into account other aspects of performance like storage and RAM speeds. This helped in favor of the Moto Z Droid.

Basemark X (medium)

Higher is better

  • Lenovo Moto Z Droid
    42493
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge
    40998
  • Samsung Galaxy S7 edge (Snapdragon)
    36554
  • HTC 10
    30680
  • Huawei P9
    29583

The Moto Z runs a bit warm when performing high-activity tasks like playing a hardware intensive game or updating a bunch of apps at once. But it gets the hottest when playing a GPS-intensive game that also uses the camera like Pokemon Go. The Snapdragon 820 is a great and crazy fast CPU, don't get us wrong. We love the performance on the Moto Z Droid and it performed exceptionally well and we saw no visible lag anywhere even in high-performance games like RipTide2.

Unfortunately, the super thin design of the phone obviously has not allowed for a serious heat dissipation system to be put in place and it can get uncomfortably warm at times.

Reader comments

  • LucaZ
  • 02 Dec 2020
  • mTh

hi, I have many of them (z, z play, z force) they all works great in a different speed, sorry to say but most of negative post on it are because I guess most of them don`t use the right cover when unplugging the phone, I had the same problem but I re...

  • Anonymous
  • 16 Jul 2019
  • jsI

Z4 has a 3.5mm jack again....so who was right?

  • Stihy
  • 23 Nov 2018
  • m1c

After using this phone for 8 months this is what i know. -Phone i fast -Camera is good -Durability is not good -Batery is horible. U can't use phone for 4-5 hours withouth charge. For a price of battery pack addon you can buy Xiaomi A...