Moto G7 family hands-on review

GSMArena team, 07 February 2019.

Software

The entire Moto G7 family comes with Android 9.0 Pie out of the box. The familiar Motorola customizations like Moto Display and Moto Actions are available as well.

One of the biggest changes Google introduced with Pie was gesture navigation but Motorola has had its own take on the pill since long before that with the Moto Z2. In its latest, slightly tweaked, iteration here it's called One-button nav and it's closer to Google's own implementation than the full-screen gestures of other makers. Basically, you swipe left on the bar to go Back, swipe right to quickly switch between the last two apps, swipe up for the task switcher, tap the bar to go Home, and tap-hold for Google Assistant.

Moto G7 Plus user interface - Motorola Moto G7 hands-on review Moto G7 Plus user interface - Motorola Moto G7 hands-on review Moto G7 Plus user interface - Motorola Moto G7 hands-on review Moto G7 Plus user interface - Motorola Moto G7 hands-on review Moto G7 Plus user interface - Motorola Moto G7 hands-on review
Moto G7 Plus user interface

Synthetic benchmarks

The Moto G7 Plus is powered by the Snapdragon 636 chipset, which was fairly popular in the midrange last year, but is a bit less exciting in 2019. Even so, it's an adequately powerful contemporary 14nm SoC with 8 Kryo 260 cores in its CPU, ticking as high as 1.8GHz.

The other three G7s rely on the more modest but still perfectly acceptable Snapdragon 632. Its octa-core Kryo 250 CPU (don't you just love Qualcomm nomeclature) is also clocked at up to 1.8, but is ever so slightly less brawny.

Motorola Moto G7 hands-on review

More significant difference can be observed in the graphics department where the Adreno 509 of the S636 is some 45-60% more powerful than the Adreno 506 in the S632. Logic dictates that the regular Moto G7 will be the least proud of its graphics benchmark scores of this quartet - it's got a high-res FullHD display and a relatively underpowered GPU. The Play and the Power models have lower-res 720p displays to go with their Adreno 506, which will give them an edge in real-life onscreen performance, while the high-res FullHD Moto G7 Plus has the upgraded Adreno 509 GPU.

In any case, we got to run some benchmarks on the top-of-the-line Moto G7 Plus and here come the results. For comparison purposes, we're including other S636 devices we've tested before, as well as the only other S632 smartphone that we've managed to get our hands on - the Asus Zenfone Max M2. Competing midrange chips are also in those charts.

GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Realme U1
    6004
  • Oppo RX17 Pro
    5944
  • Xiaomi Mi 8 SE
    5908
  • Oppo F9 (F9 Pro)
    5673
  • Nokia 7.1
    4975
  • BlackBerry KEY2 LE
    4965
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
    4933
  • Nokia 6.1 Plus
    4929
  • Motorola Moto G7 Plus
    4927
  • ASUS ZenFone Max M2
    4744
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)
    4446
  • Motorola Moto G6 Plus
    4160
  • Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
    4144

GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 8 SE
    1890
  • Oppo RX17 Pro
    1835
  • Realme U1
    1567
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)
    1524
  • Oppo F9 (F9 Pro)
    1497
  • Nokia 7.1
    1344
  • BlackBerry KEY2 LE
    1343
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
    1342
  • Motorola Moto G7 Plus
    1334
  • Nokia 6.1 Plus
    1331
  • ASUS ZenFone Max M2
    1257
  • Motorola Moto G6 Plus
    882
  • Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
    839

AnTuTu 7

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 8 SE
    170218
  • Oppo RX17 Pro
    154861
  • Realme U1
    144436
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)
    123883
  • Motorola Moto G7 Plus
    117829
  • Nokia 7.1
    117175
  • BlackBerry KEY2 LE
    116764
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
    115605
  • Nokia 6.1 Plus
    115571
  • ASUS ZenFone Max M2
    103243
  • Motorola Moto G6 Plus
    90263
  • Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
    86374

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 8 SE
    33
  • Oppo RX17 Pro
    32
  • Realme U1
    22
  • Oppo F9 (F9 Pro)
    20
  • Nokia 6.1 Plus
    16
  • BlackBerry KEY2 LE
    16
  • Nokia 7.1
    16
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
    16
  • Motorola Moto G7 Plus
    16
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)
    16
  • Motorola Moto G6 Plus
    14
  • Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
    14
  • ASUS ZenFone Max M2
    10

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 8 SE
    30
  • Oppo RX17 Pro
    28
  • Realme U1
    20
  • ASUS ZenFone Max M2
    19
  • BlackBerry KEY2 LE
    18
  • Oppo F9 (F9 Pro)
    18
  • Nokia 6.1 Plus
    15
  • Nokia 7.1
    15
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
    15
  • Motorola Moto G7 Plus
    15
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)
    15
  • Motorola Moto G6 Plus
    13
  • Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
    13

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Oppo RX17 Pro
    23
  • Xiaomi Mi 8 SE
    23
  • Realme U1
    13
  • Oppo F9 (F9 Pro)
    12
  • Nokia 6.1 Plus
    10
  • Nokia 7.1
    10
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
    10
  • Motorola Moto G7 Plus
    10
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)
    10
  • Motorola Moto G6 Plus
    9.8
  • Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
    9.5
  • ASUS ZenFone Max M2
    6.9

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 8 SE
    22
  • Oppo RX17 Pro
    19
  • ASUS ZenFone Max M2
    14
  • Realme U1
    12
  • Oppo F9 (F9 Pro)
    11
  • Nokia 7.1
    9.7
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro
    9.7
  • Motorola Moto G7 Plus
    9.7
  • Nokia 6.1 Plus
    9.6
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)
    9.4
  • Motorola Moto G6 Plus
    9.3
  • Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
    9.1

Reader comments

  • softwaretester
  • 18 Feb 2019
  • PB%

Apple's quality is on top? I just wonder why some basic and major functionalities have issues apprearing in their devices. Im pretty sure that they are testing their devices but i think not that well. I think their dev team is not doing unit and i...

"Apple's quality is still on top" Hahaha! What a comedian xD Apple's got a lot of money, and they obviosly save a lot on testing as they clearly don't do much of it. Lucky for your wife she got the 5S. Where the 5 was the public beta d...

Vanilla android is helpful on opening basic apps a milisencond faster, but that does not take away the performance advantage the SD660 have over the SD636 where it actually matters, games. Not sure which version of the Note 7 they compare, 3, 4 ...