Motorola RAZR maxx V6
- K
- KICH
- Rn@
- 26 Jul 2006
I am jealous that I didn't come up with one design that could be re released two or three times a year with mediocre feats, terrible O.S and minor improvements along with a dynamic marketing team who can "brainwash sheep" into thinking that this is the "in thing"
- H
- Harlekkin
- 2Zt
- 26 Jul 2006
@ Defender
Nokia, SE, LG, SHARP etc. are all manufactuers of Europe or Asia (obviously...).
GSM 850/1900 isn't their main priority as they are not trying to reach the Americas exclusively. All main models are released as tri-band because 1900 Mhz is the most important band (used in US metropolitan ares) as where 850 Mhz (wider reach) is used in rural areas.
Motorola as an US company has to consider this more carefully, but other manufacturers simply don't care. As long as they can cover frequent travellers/business people with the 1900Mhz that's all they care about.
The next challenge is producing dual/tri-band 3G phones that can suit the Americas... there we go: WCDMA 850/1900/2100 + GSM 850/900/1800/1900? How many bands should a phone offer...maybe on top we take CDMA 800. Those 8-bands cover the world...
With the US being so strict on their frequencies this problem isn't likely to get solved any time soon.
Go complain to the government :(
Harlekkin
- d
- defender
- jnZ
- 26 Jul 2006
Hey KISH, stop being jealous. I like nokia's but why can't they makethe earpiece volume LOUDER! Thats my only problem with Nokia. SE I CAN'T STAND. Their menu stucture sucks big time. Samsung is good, I like their screens but have the little things, like not being able to use certain sound formats my moto can play as ringtones. I just can't figure out why phone companies just can't make quad-band phones instead of 2 tribands 1 for the americas and 1 for europe et al. If this were a quad-band or at least offered 850 band, i'd be all over it!
- K
- KICH
- Rn@
- 26 Jul 2006
Only Moto users are actually impressed by this set, Don't understand how this or any Moto after the first V3 can get such a high rate for design,(only fanboys will still rate an old design so high)and fts are not that impressive either.
Guess you guys can't wait for the blue,pink and the D&G RAZR MAXX
- H
- Harlekkin
- 2Zt
- 26 Jul 2006
Motorola vs. Samsung
======================
Same old story, one design takes off and the rest of the series have to suffer. Samsungs E700 started it, and so did Motorola's V3 RAZR. It's like printing: You make a copy of a copy of a copy and the end result is crappy.
This idea has been recycled so much now that it really is about time to wake up. I mean, buy it if you like it, but you'll just be another Motorola RAZR user. Phones are usually not about being "fashionista", but Motorola aim to be, so why is everyone buying the same damn phone? Band-wagon...
And you all have no idea how happy Motorola is about band-wagons... You guys make them SO much money and they don't have to put in ANY effort. Like a cheap drug, you guys are hooked! lol
Anyway, it's not up to me what you all buy. It's sad though that Moto, Samsung, SE etc. are exalted til heaven, but other better quality brands get hardly any recognition.
Motorola should make clothing to suit the phones lol. So all you Motorola fans can start a fashion trend :P
Harlekkin
- i
- i like fones
- Bqt
- 26 Jul 2006
I can see both sides of the arguement but who really cares its a new phone and its better than all the other v3's so stop complaining and if you got nothing nice to say dont say it!!!
- c
- cangkei
- TST
- 26 Jul 2006
nice job motorola for funtion . but design not improve.
- a
- asdf
- PBP
- 26 Jul 2006
theres a 10mp phone, but its samsung
- B
- BLACK POWA
- P4S
- 26 Jul 2006
One more thing, why people cry about "2mp camera" or "3.2mp camera"? I think a quality 2mp camera is enough to take shots of things since I don't need a phone with a 8mp camera to take shots of microorganisms due to the huge resolution. If you want a 3, 5, 8mp camera, BUY A DIGITAL CAMERA! they take perfect shots, not that sh*t with a lot noise you can see at the pictures... Or wait the mobile technology advance more enough to provide us phones with a QUALITY digital camera, QUALITY video recorder, QUALITY mobile TV broadcasting and etc...
- B
- BLACK POWA
- P4S
- 26 Jul 2006
Desing is just superb... I can have a orgasm just looking at it, but it lack of features. No Wi-Fi or even the IrDA that Motorola never learned to do, at least it has built-in HSDPA. I wonder a phone with N93 features and RAZR maxx desing... just perfect. If N93 become a success, maybe Nokia could hire Motorola designers :D
- t
- tangna
- PV2
- 26 Jul 2006
just a question...is your 3.2 MP fone is 15mm thick?
- M
- M
- TKb
- 26 Jul 2006
Motorola lovers rejoice- look at these wonderful new phones with these great specs.
- s
- simon
- n17
- 26 Jul 2006
looks like it has the same tired old naff menus,i thought motorola was replacing these this would of been a good time to start,no radio either still at least the 2nd screen is now 65k not 4096k as before.
- ?
- Anonymous
- TKb
- 26 Jul 2006
This the best Motorola ever - I am getting this phone .
- l
- lucas
- 43T
- 26 Jul 2006
and for the south korean market, they have 7, 8, and 10 megapixel camerea phones. and i have a 3.2, none of this impresses me...
- ?
- Anonymous
- jZe
- 26 Jul 2006
11/10/06 does that meean its coming out then
- S
- SomeGuyThatLikesPhon
- QMs
- 26 Jul 2006
Razrs r gettin old noww.. plus the updates not even taht good.. gangsta is rite NOKIA and SE all the way and samsung slides
- A
- Adam
- TXb
- 26 Jul 2006
This is so beautiful!! I have the V3x, but I'll change it to this phone. I've get in love in this phone!!! Rally beauty!!
- b
- byter
- kbM
- 25 Jul 2006
you phone noob "theres already a 5 mp camera phone"
- ?
- Anonymous
- Pv9
- 25 Jul 2006
but nokia released it first, and it have better cameras. same goes for sony ericsson and samsung.