Motorola RIZR Z10
- b
- bA
- Lxk
- 29 May 2008
***up to 4 Gb not 32GB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! booo haha
- m
- moto maxx
- MxX
- 29 May 2008
Chris, 28 May 2008This phone looks amazing in the specs but in reality it sad... morewhat you talkin bout boy?
this phone looks and feels quality. the slide is far better than any nokia se slide and it does not feel att all cheap.
if you had checked b4 you brought the phone it clearly says everywhere that it is usb not 3.5mm
a very very deluded man who clearly cannot handle a real quality phone, maybe a nokia 3310 would be more suitable?
- m
- manoj beeda
- mqk
- 28 May 2008
sean, 27 May 2008@anyone thinking of getting this fone cos it looks excelle... morei just bought the phone, the sound quality is amazing better than any motorola phone till date.
- C
- Chris
- mAn
- 28 May 2008
This phone looks amazing in the specs but in reality it sadly dissapoints. Firstly holding the phone: it feels cheap dut to the fact it is all plastic, the top half which slides up wobbles and moves quite alot.Camera and volume keys on the side also feel very loose. Internally the phone is very slow, even at doing simple tasks, why sould i wait 1.5 - 2 seconds just to see my contact list? The phone also crashes all the time, wheather i have exited my applications properly or not!
There is no headphone jack, just mini usb!
Seriously guys DO NOT bother with this phone, there are far better ones on the market with the same specs. Mine is going back.
- ?
- Anonymous
- upq
- 27 May 2008
Excellent fone......... perfect display better than n81,nseries..... really...
wifi would be gr8
- s
- sean
- mpT
- 27 May 2008
@anyone
thinking of getting this fone cos it looks excellent, am used to s/e though so am a bit worried. so can anyone tell me wot the music quality is like cheers
- D
- Dave
- nFq
- 26 May 2008
OIKLed, 24 May 2008kuldeep, reason is fairly simple. You really dont need anyt... moreMate you need more than a 3.2 camera just to get descent 6*4 photo's you could never make jumbo ads with a 5mp. I work for a photo company and i have seen the quality of the 3.2's the only descent one is the SE camera.
- g
- g unit
- pJy
- 25 May 2008
great phone, had it a month. . . had to send it back to o2 friday as it had crashed and will not turn on?
waiting for a replacement
- k
- kisna
- M@T
- 25 May 2008
i dont think a 5mp camera is needed 4 a cellphone.
it is needed only when u r going to print jumbo pictures.
3MP enough 4 cell.
i owned a sony ericsson k790 and d picture quality is awesome.i loved this phone(z10)ever since it launch.
waiting 4 its launch in india.
hope they will keep balance between features n price factor.
- O
- OIKLed
- ptC
- 24 May 2008
kuldeep, reason is fairly simple. You really dont need anything more then 3.2MP. Like someone said in this post anything over that and your printing jumbo ads. Would be best if all the competitors worked on optics and making a 3.2MP camera just like a digital cameras and not bouncing with 5 8 10 that have optics that are crap. I think Moto is going this way. More technology in the 3,2 & 5 MP space. This might be what the Kodak Motorola team up is.
Hell id even take a VGA phone if the optics were perfect for printing photos. ;) remember optics of MP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- k
- kuldeep
- RKX
- 23 May 2008
although the phone is overall awesom but the q. is here arise dat why motorola uses these 2 or 3.15 mp cameras in these cool mobiles
- ?
- Anonymous
- TmR
- 23 May 2008
phone is great, but video review sucks!
- ?
- Anonymous
- Lj$
- 22 May 2008
Motorola can do a lot better
waiting
:D
- l
- luis
- P1U
- 22 May 2008
Does this phone has 3.5 mm jack??
It seems like a great gadget. Only expecting the adequate price (the difference between success and failure).
- B
- Bob
- TXc
- 21 May 2008
First 3.2 MPx Moto phone? Hahaha. The Moto MS550 was released 2005/06 being one of the first 3.2 MPx mobiles ever released by a big company (although it can be found only in Asia).
All the best!
- X
- Xia
- wuc
- 21 May 2008
A very strong competitor among 3MP camera phones...even I think its a step ahead among some of its competitors in following manners:
1. Scratch-resistance screen. Nokia isnt offering this.
2. 3 MP camera with xenon flash.
3. Video(QVGA 30fps)
4. Symbian UIQ.
5. Unlimited phone book.
6. 16 million colors.
7. 3G.
8. Seperate processor for multimedia.
9. Strong Battery time.
It’s time to accept the truth. We should not criticize Motorola phones for the reason they are not Nokia. Things have changed. Its very kiddy and foolish approach to support phones only cuz of brand. Specially when Nokia and also Sony Ericson phones have been proved to be faulty and waste of money. I ve read different comparison with this phone, wherein ppl evaluating their Nokia or S.E as they are the sole judge. This is CRAP !!! Let's wait for GSM Arena's overview.
- s
- sean
- mp3
- 21 May 2008
hi, thinking of getting this fone wen i upgrade but am used to s/e fones and am a bit worried if it will match up. i think its an excellent looking fone but wot is the music and video player like, anyone help cheers
- n
- neil mcdermott
- m5u
- 20 May 2008
well ive just upgraded to this phone and still unsure whether to keep it or go for another brand before my 14 day return runs out.i must say the phone looks great and the screen quality looks good and pics look good too feel as if it should have had a bigger screen for the movies.anyway my dilema keep or take back for n958gb or soul hmmmm
- P
- POPIENOK
- ptC
- 20 May 2008
This phone is great, bought one off of ebay and got it today. Only thing i would add is wifi, thats about it. the 3.2 MP camera is really nice, takes great pics. Perfect replacement for my old buggy crashing Nokia. Would def recommend this phone to anyone. Thanks motorola, keep the Symbian UIQ comming out!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 2Fy
- 19 May 2008
A great phone from the MP inventor...Motorola phones are still the most practical & best quality "overall"!