Motorola ROKR ZN50 MORE PICTURES

Motorola ROKR ZN50

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • mD7
  • 14 Aug 2009

its elegant

    • M
    • MdN
    • Mtr
    • 13 Aug 2009

    Anonymous, 12 Aug 2009WTF r u sayin? This fonez camera iz da worst in 2009. Find ... moreEasy. Sony Ericsson Jalou. Try the Motorola camera in low light, with no flash (I hate flash), against other phones and you'll see. Learn how to spell. Don't compare this one to phones twice the price. And send that cookie via air mail ;-)

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • nbu
      • 12 Aug 2009

      chan, 03 Aug 2009same specsheet as a HTC phone u had in 2005 ??!! hahahaaaa... moreW995, N86 n Innov8 all beat diz fone in all specz!

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • nbu
        • 12 Aug 2009

        MdN, 04 Aug 2009I can agree with that. The specs are "average", we can all ... moreWTF r u sayin? This fonez camera iz da worst in 2009. Find any worze fone dis year, n ill give u a cookie.

          • ?
          • Anonymous
          • nbu
          • 12 Aug 2009

          pooja, 11 Aug 2009i want to knw that how is the picture quality and speaker v... moreThe camera sucks like the most Moto's, but the sound quality is quite decent actually. I highly doubt this handset will be reviewed. This is basicly a copy of a 2007 SE model.

            • p
            • pooja
            • 2@Y
            • 11 Aug 2009

            i want to knw that how is the picture quality and speaker volume of this phone?pls reply only those who use this phone.pls tell me its pons and cons...

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • 0FR
              • 10 Aug 2009

              very nice design

                • m
                • moto fan
                • Mf5
                • 10 Aug 2009

                motorolla made female sets. afew sets for male aal folder sets are ladies. young genration not like folding style. but slider is good. the slider is fation.

                  • h
                  • hart
                  • wrn
                  • 09 Aug 2009

                  how come no wifi..??!!!

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • fs1
                    • 09 Aug 2009

                    Used to love Motorola phones ever since those bricks we had in the early days, but seems they've lost the plot since the 'razor' phones. Hope they get it together again because their phones always had the clearest reception.

                      • s
                      • salman
                      • Mf5
                      • 08 Aug 2009

                      but motolla is american company u not support to u s company because american r killer master in the world mother daughter childern brother all 2 killed by america.

                        • M
                        • MdN
                        • Mtr
                        • 07 Aug 2009

                        100 Moto, 05 Aug 2009Is strange how many people look at almost any new must be "... moreOh, I know. Okay, plenty of people sign contracts and get phones for cheap once a year, so they don't look at prices at all. But I'm on pay-as-you-go - half of my country is - talk is almost as cheap, I can use most services if I need them, but I don't get phone bills, so I just get a mid-range unlocked phone, sometimes even an used one just to try it, and they still work perfectly.

                        It sometimes sounds like if a phone doesn't have all those abbreviations in the specs sheet that it's no good - come on, it won't explode in your face and you'll definitely be able to talk, message, listen to music, take pictures, and use as many features as you have paid for. And if it looks good and performs well, and Motorola usually does, why not? You have to carry it around and look at it several times a day. And, yeah, even $100 is one hell of a price difference when talking about electronics. I'm definitely not complaining if I have a $300 or $400 Motorola and it doesn't have all the specs like an $800 or $1000 Nokia N-series or Samsung or HTC or whatever. Sure those are great, but they cost a lot. But sometimes I'm wondering if the real difference could just be a $2 chip inside instead of a $1 one, $10 camera instead of $5 camera, and the brand name...

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • uy1
                          • 07 Aug 2009

                          this phone was released in korea for korean market,it's been here more than 2 weeks and not really selling well compared to korean brands.it's thicker compared to other touch screen handsets available.exclusively for sk telecom.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • mD7
                            • 07 Aug 2009

                            this phone have 4 gb internal memory
                            Accelerometer sensor and
                            - Gesture control

                              • O
                              • OrangeMan89
                              • Mk4
                              • 07 Aug 2009

                              Anyone else think it looks alot like the Sony Ericsson W910i ?

                                • W
                                • Weezy
                                • 9HE
                                • 06 Aug 2009

                                What a beauty! lol

                                  • g
                                  • geRry21
                                  • PSe
                                  • 05 Aug 2009

                                  lot of pipz are complaining bout the specs but dont forget the basic thing "cellphones" are invented for calling and texting...

                                    9 of 20