Motorola W220
- L
- LastJedi
- 2WH
- 14 Oct 2006
Is the radio on this mob a stereo,like a SE j230 or a mono ,like the 6030 ?..hope its stereo.
- b
- bigpimp
- U2h
- 14 Oct 2006
It looks neat & finally got a flip phone without a camera....
- s
- swarnima.s
- TSL
- 14 Oct 2006
i got this phone gifted to me yesterday and m very happy with it.
at least i can listen to music to my hearts content.
i think the battery is also too gud.
thanks to jaanu to gift me this phone.
i will be always obliged...
and to tell all the lovers of the world, its a gud phone to be gifted...
makes your way to hearts easily.
chao
- s
- s.sushil
- TSL
- 14 Oct 2006
i bought this phone just yesterday and should say that it is definitely a good buy.
i am delighted that motorola has finally come up with a phone which is very cool and adaptable for people who dont want cameras and stuff.
a phone is a phone is a phone ...
and Motorola W220 is the baap of all phones...
keep it up motorola.
- ?
- Anonymous
- w4t
- 14 Oct 2006
Hi there guys. I just bought this phone yesterday and i must say, its a great buy. For people wanting to know if its worth it or not, in my opinion, it is definatly worth it. I just bought this phone as a secondary phone and for the price, it really works well. Very responsive, looks nice, and nice color display. You really cant expect more out of a phone of this price but, if you just want an inexpensive phone that looks great and performs well, this should be a good choice for you. Hope this helps.
- v
- vicky
- R5f
- 14 Oct 2006
does this fone has a dual screen or shud v open n check whoz calling us.
- E
- Emmanuel
- FMY
- 13 Oct 2006
Price of MotoW220 in INR 3999 only. It's a nice buy even without a Camera
- I
- Inder
- RK6
- 12 Oct 2006
I think it is a good phone considering the price. Not all people want camera and blue tooth. It has FM and that too with speaker phone. Price is less than Rs.4000 (less than $100) in India. A clam shell at this price with FM is good. Lot of teenagers can go for this.
- ?
- Anonymous
- U2c
- 11 Oct 2006
Itz a Clam-Shell version of their C168.
Itz price is Rs.3990 in India as per the ADs.
Cheapest clam phone with FM Radio.
No competetion for it as of now....
- s
- skills
- U2Y
- 10 Oct 2006
it is a wonderfull phone..and as far as the price is concerned it empties only 4300 Rs from ur wallet...wow...
- ?
- Anonymous
- PUZ
- 10 Oct 2006
Finally a nice looking clam shell with out a horde of unwanted features! So hard to find a good clam shell with basic features and no camera.
- r
- raaj
- P$x
- 09 Oct 2006
Hey gus's It shud have a camera, without that, it doesn't look like a completed one.
any way nice look like v3, But I don't know exact price in Indian Rs. can any one tell me wat's the cost of it as of now.
- ?
- Anonymous
- jn@
- 09 Oct 2006
i agree nice model for price it is a shame good features are not motorola standard for all models. i personally adore my a1200
thank you to all readers from etoile mobile kid
- s
- sorin
- nD%
- 09 Oct 2006
Very good design, solid looking and smooth metal-like surfaces. But when it comes to what it has to offer, it's a complete disaster! 64 k screen colours, 128x128 pixel resolution (like my old 6230 that was launched in 2003!!), less than 1 MB user memory (lol), no bluetooth, no IR, no USB, no camera (oh, god!) and even no mp3.
Is this a 2006 model or it's a 2003 refurbished one that came on the market by mistake?
- m
- mithashad
- M{3
- 09 Oct 2006
we are waiting for this model,b'cos of the features,but why motorola is not changing the design of v3.now almost all motorola models similar to v3. pls find new exciting designs
- ?
- Anonymous
- Ih4
- 07 Oct 2006
I Think its a good phone for the price (£45) seen as it has GPRS and WAP 2.0/XHTML browser and a good screena and FM radio, and good standby time and talk time. But motorola has copied Alcatel by using the symbols on front except for one symbol which they use a battery icon and alcatel is signal and that it only has 500kb of user memory which is rather poor. And also the bottom bit of the phone is abit fat.... Overall i'd give it a 6 out of 10 i guess....
- ?
- Anonymous
- PZt
- 02 Oct 2006
this is a descent looking phone that is targeted at low-end user but SP is right, it should not cost more than $100 and since it does, it's too expensive and not worth it. there are phones with almost same price or are cheaper that have more features like camera as compared to this one.
- ?
- Anonymous
- PZt
- 02 Oct 2006
hey!SP! Start writing to Motorola coz this phone cost around $118!
- j
- james_kings
- PjC
- 01 Oct 2006
this mobile has handsfree really or just with the earphones?
- N
- Nicholas
- Ycp
- 27 Sep 2006
I think you're missing the point with this phone. If it did have a camera and/or bluetooth, it'll be in direct competition with the RAZR, and I'm certain for a way cheaper price. I personally like this design more than RAZR too - looks more childish I guess, with the huge icons on the front. Targetted towards teens who are getting their very first phone but their parents don't wanna bust their wallet? I'm sure this is a reasonable compromise between style and affordability.