Motorola W395
- ?
- Anonymous
- nEB
- 29 Mar 2007
I think this phone was designed with upgraders in mind that want a new phone but cannot goto the extreme, and also when have motorola ever made a bad phone? motorola are and always will be the leaders in the cell phone market
- ?
- Anonymous
- PDL
- 29 Mar 2007
===============================================
To: Yc06
u all ppl got a point here. someone complain, sue, destroy to this motorola company. motorola u sure make a lot of crappy same phones. get a life. even samsung, nokia, s.e is wayyyyy beeeettteeerr!
=============================================
Why Samsung not to be rank 2 or 1 if you said better? Samsung always dreaming brand; before "Samsung" said want to be rank 1 in year 2010. Hahaha... Get real!!! Samsung from year to year always drop share market. Samsung need grow 5% global share market every year with note no one grow. Hahaha... If Samsung want to be rank 2, need grow 3% global share market every year with note no one grow. Hahaha... Is that "Samsung" better than "Motorola"? Are you blind?
Why Sony Ericsson not to be rank 2 or 1 if you said better?
Hahaha... Give the fact if Nokia is better than Motorola. Why Nokia only got 9% share market in China? Why Nokia only grow 1.7% global share market? Motorola grow 3.4% global share market. From year to year "Motorola" global share market nearly compare "Nokia". Before "Motorola" global share market if compare with "Nokia" need 2 times but not for now.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Yc0
- 29 Mar 2007
u all ppl got a point here. someone complain, sue, destroy to this motorola company. motorola u sure make a lot of crappy same phones. get a life. even samsung, nokia, s.e is wayyyyy beeeettteeerr!
- R
- Riz
- ijn
- 29 Mar 2007
No FM radio
- ?
- Anonymous
- 2CE
- 29 Mar 2007
These are the entry-level range, you twits. There are still some others who just want a phone for a phone and not some swiss army knife.
- J
- Josh
- N95
- 29 Mar 2007
Those comments like boring or whatever makes me .. let´s say anxious , because again THESE ARE AFFORDABLE PHONES, i will repeat these again and again come on, get the point!
- J
- Josh
- N95
- 29 Mar 2007
Me agian, sorry for some mistakes before, you can´t compare Nokia N95 to this, please N95 is first expensive,is a very nice phone, with tons of features, AGAIN IS NOT AFFORDABLE, besides nokia also has crappy phones for those customers that can´t get the latest phones is it clear now, these phones are an strategy, they are not "great phones" with tons of features, please read carefully
- J
- Josh
- N95
- 29 Mar 2007
O.k the people here they don´t understand that these phones are "AFFORDABLE" OR THEY ARE BLIND, it is obvious this an strategy from motorola for all types of customers como on, anlyze first and the write ok.
- ?
- Anonymous
- PDL
- 29 Mar 2007
===============================================
To: 4BcA
i can buy a phone 4 y ago or from 4 years ago and have more features then most motorolla phones . look a the 6230i or nokia 6230
=============================================
Your "Nokia 6230i" can't compare with "Motorola E680i" because "Motorola E680i" is more powerful. With same price "Nokia 6230i" i can buy "Motorola E680i". "Motorola E680i" is more powerful and more features than "Nokia 6230i". "Motorola E680i" and "Nokia 6230i" is same year launching.
- ?
- Anonymous
- PDL
- 28 Mar 2007
=============================================
To: pqya
i understand that handset is 100$. but tell me in general,one mobile,from any brand to challange nokia n95,n93i,e90. all the brands wuth their actual high-end mobiles,are still living in the stone age compared with n95,n93,e90
=============================================
What features you need compare? I look nearly 95% "Nokia" with OS "Symbian" is un-stable, freeze and slow processor. From 10 year ago until now still has same problem; that's un-stable OS "Symbian", same problem "freeze", slow processor; that's is the fact.
Before i try to use Nokia 9110, Nokia 9210, Nokia 9300, Nokia 9300i, Nokia 9500, Nokia E61, Nokia N70, Nokia N73, Nokia N80; all of that Nokia has same problem. The problems is slow processor, un-stable OS "Symbian", and freeze. I use "Motorola M1000" use OS "Symbian"; never freeze, stable OS "Symbian", faster than "Nokia" processor.
"Nokia 6300" try to copy from "Motorola Slim Concept Phone" but "Nokia 6300" has many problem. Example: Over Heat, Short time battery live. And know "Nokia N76" try to copy from "Motorola V3 Razr". Is that all "Nokia" copy mobile from "Motorola" has the record retail like "Motorola Razr" has record sold 50 million units?
My friend has "Nokia 7610". She use only for 1 1/2 years after that the IC is break. Is that "Nokia High End" quality? Oh man, too poor. I use "Motorola V3 Razr" (basic features phone) from 2004 until now in year 2007; doesn't ever has problem.
The fact is "Motorola" got award "customer satisfaction". The fact "Nokia" share market not really grow. "Motorola" share market grow 2 times than "Nokia" between "Q1-Q4,2005" until "Q1-Q4,2006". The fact in China, "Motorola" has share market more than 19% and "Nokia" only has share market more than 9%. Note: The most faster grow mobile market in the world is China.
- r
- realest
- kbh
- 28 Mar 2007
interestingly enough it is better than the razr
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4Bc
- 28 Mar 2007
i can buy a phone 4 y ago or from 4 years ago and have more features then most motorolla phones . look a the 6230i or nokia 6230
- ?
- Anonymous
- pqy
- 28 Mar 2007
i understand that handset is 100$. but tell me in general,one mobile,from any brand to challange nokia n95,n93i,e90. all the brands wuth their actual high-end mobiles,are still living in the stone age compared with n95,n93,e90
- n
- nishant
- 2S@
- 28 Mar 2007
guys this is supposed to be lower end , have it all mobile from motorola , this is supposed to be cheap thts y they'v got 1.3mp cam and all
u guys need to chill
- M
- MotoFan
- Uqs
- 28 Mar 2007
Guys, first understand one thing; these are all sub $100 hand sets. Now tell me which Nokia/SE phone under $100 has comparable features!
- ?
- Anonymous
- PDL
- 28 Mar 2007
===============================================
To: George
razr again. boring!
===============================================
It's better than copy from other brand design. "Motorola" design with own design. The fact is "Motorola" make customer satisfaction.
- ?
- Anonymous
- PDL
- 28 Mar 2007
=============================================
To: dots
Not bad...for a phone catering for the not so RICH...COME ON YA"LL THINK EVERY1 IS AS RICH AS YOU???!!! The phone maybe not good for some of u...but it is still a moderate and usable phone...you think every1 can afford N95 that comes wif 5mp and terrible design??!!
=============================================
I agree with you. Only wise people can thinking not to compare between "Low End" with "High End". "Nokia N95" is the most ugly design ever i find and the body is cheapest plastic mobile (i already look and try to use in my hand). Oh man... Nokia no sense of design.
- G
- George
- PdC
- 28 Mar 2007
razr again. boring!
- d
- dots
- ib6
- 28 Mar 2007
Not bad...for a phone catering for the not so RICH...COME ON YA"LL THINK EVERY1 IS AS RICH AS YOU???!!! The phone maybe not good for some of u...but it is still a moderate and usable phone...you think every1 can afford N95 that comes wif 5mp and terrible design??!!
- l
- ling
- PYM
- 28 Mar 2007
this phone is a embarasment to all motorola phones