Polaroid's new Selfie smartphone faces legal trouble with Oppo
- D
- AnonD-4254
- U@9
- 10 Jan 2015
lets go, 10 Jan 2015It's NOT like you have to ACTUALLY visit China*** to check... moreWhere does the product come from?
My post was about the text used in the post, which seemed to be of such poor english that its almost Blog-class.
Rest of your post, I'll assume its your ego speaking.
- ?
- Anonymous
- kj2
- 10 Jan 2015
so it's ok for them to copy others but not the other way around?
- l
- lets go
- IaH
- 10 Jan 2015
Redmi 1S+808 Samarth, 10 Jan 2015The pasted text from OPPO shows three things:-
1. Oppo i... moreIt's NOT like you have to ACTUALLY visit China*** to check out the phone (***Oppo are USAn)
SURPRISE you're actually posting in GSMarena so can check
Sometimes I see great posts or replies to great posts which are really banal, or just PLANE stupid posts....
Here'a clue if you don't know what you are talking about or too lazy to do research.. just read the article and let the grown ups speak http://www.gsmarena.com/oppo_n1-pictures-5724.php
- C
- Charley
- Y7U
- 10 Jan 2015
Oppo is upset that someone copied their design? lol, that's rich.
- H
- Huhster
- 3GR
- 10 Jan 2015
This exact rotating camera design was on many laptops in the mid 2000s. Maybe Oppo should read up on prior art.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LBH
- 10 Jan 2015
Motorola A830 2003
- D
- AnonD-217536
- sEC
- 10 Jan 2015
Local Brand MITO already got away with it since Oppo's launch of N1.
Here is a peak at the device:
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.begawei.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F05%2Fmito-fantasy-selfie-a77.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.begawei.com%2F2014%2F05%2Fmito-fantasy-selfie-a77-ponsel-murah.html&h=469&w=760&tbnid=913Aj11vboEFPM%3A&zoom=1&docid=Imgof3bHQTo86M&ei=40GxVPC_NZOgugTUv4CgBw&tbm=isch&ved=0CCAQMygEMAQ&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=726&page=1&start=0&ndsp=30
- ?
- Anonymous
- RXq
- 10 Jan 2015
people are defending Polaroid because they think it is a American brand. The phone has a MediaTek chip set. Most likely it is a Chinese made phone.
- ?
- Anonymous
- RXq
- 10 Jan 2015
It's funny how a lot of commentors here jumps on and bashes any Chinese phone that looks somewhat similar to any well known smartphone. But when it is the other way around, and it is so obvious in this case, people are defending the copycat and bashing OPPO.
- d
- drickz
- PA7
- 10 Jan 2015
well, if it's really polaroid phone in the image then they should be ashamed for 100% design rip-off from a chinese brand.
- D
- AnonD-296101
- tue
- 10 Jan 2015
nokia got some phone with rotating camera too
- K
- Kokoliha
- nmM
- 10 Jan 2015
My old Nokia N90 had also a rotating camera. I loved that phone really much!
- L
- LG LG LG
- S75
- 10 Jan 2015
r6680jc, 10 Jan 2015Samsung SGH X710 (introduced on 2004) was one of the first ... morehttp://www.gsmarena.com/lg_u8110-777.php
rotation camera nothing new
- ?
- Anonymous
- p2L
- 10 Jan 2015
Anonymous, 10 Jan 2015And I thought rotating cameras were implemented on a phone ... moreNope samsung had it in 2003
- ?
- Anonymous
- p2L
- 10 Jan 2015
r6680jc, 10 Jan 2015Samsung SGH X710 (introduced on 2004) was one of the first ... moreSamsung had rotating camera in 2003. Earlier;)
- ?
- Anonymous
- p2L
- 10 Jan 2015
AnonD-80331, 10 Jan 2015I first experienced that rotating camera on a phone with my... moreMe earlier in 2004 with Samsung ;)
- r
- raj
- uCn
- 10 Jan 2015
opps....I thought this was Oppo! This will be the first in history that a western company copying eastern design!??? Nah..it just looked similar...
- D
- AnonD-38544
- pmf
- 10 Jan 2015
It's funny that someone in China, where patent lawlessness is huge, wants to fight for it's own :)
- ?
- Anonymous
- vV5
- 10 Jan 2015
Never thoughtethe days American company copying China company products would come so soon...lol
Come on Polaroid at least made some differences, this is total ripped off.
- e
- egasso
- m9M
- 10 Jan 2015
I had Motorola phone with rotating camera once, it's been a while ago but that's true. You cant do anything about design. Maybe size of rotating part cant be any smaller because of sensor or something. T