iPhone 7 Plus packs 3GB of RAM indeed, GeekBench listing says

09 September 2016
Crazy-high single-core score, too.

Sort by:

  • y
  • yeehaaa999
  • MVg
  • 10 Sep 2016

Anonymous, 09 Sep 2016bro apple is for 1st world people, the elit 5% of the world... morewow that has got to be the most stupid comment of the year ffs half of job seekers have iphone you know the elite 5% get a life

    • C
    • COREPOWER
    • 6iU
    • 10 Sep 2016

    Don't worry, Q.C.S.D. 830 will be strong chip because of octa-core processor,which means double the performance.+The new cortex A73 which have 40% extra and 30% extra efficient than a72 with same clockspeed+ TSMC 10nm construction which comes extra power.

      • D
      • AnonD-22157
      • TIE
      • 10 Sep 2016

      Come on guys let's accept the reality! Well done Apple. I'm a lumia 1020 user anyway

        • D
        • AnonD-434295
        • y$i
        • 10 Sep 2016

        Vegetaholic, 09 Sep 2016What is most amazing about this article is single core scor... moreYou shouldn't compare different architecture.

          • D
          • AnonD-337419
          • ITn
          • 10 Sep 2016

          SweetrevengePH, 09 Sep 2016You think so? Okay I don't have any problem with Samsung it... moreNot flagships dude.... Samsung flagships are finest and yes note 7 is the biggest fault. I didn't say apple had got weak specs . I am saying its overpriced

            • D
            • AnonD-501550
            • 7XY
            • 10 Sep 2016

            That low multi-core score tho, even the Huawei P9 and Honor 8, who almost have the same specifications as the iPhone 7 Plus and whom are cheaper, have better scores than that

              • S
              • S7 Edge Yay
              • LaT
              • 10 Sep 2016

              Vegetaholic, 09 Sep 2016What is most amazing about this article is single core scor... moreSo I will be totally totally honest, I really did not expect it to have waterproofing, I expected that to come next year Anniversary year.

              Again yes benchmarks will come in at the high end, but I would remind all those Orchard Dwellers that this is just one feature which doesn't make up for the many many omission that the iPhone

              The WORLD needs an iPhone purely for competition, but many like ne don't need an iPhone

              The writing is on the wall and they must have accepted that given all the technical wizardry Apple will NOT be installing memory expansion any time soon

              No doubt there will be those queuing days ahead

              Onto the Bluetooth Ear Pods $159 so 25% of the basic 32Gb iPhone and iPhone launches being a news worthy event ALL TV NEWS COVERAGE reported on it.

              I only mention this as one news channel stated that there are some that will buy anything Apple produce!

              Everybody now has a mobile phone and I don't think those without an iPhone hold an iPhone in some sort of high esteem when viewed

              I concede that it has sky-high benchmark, but I would be really annoyed if I lost one of the $159 earpod
              So despite the iPhone 7 costing an arm and a leg it simply does not have 3 features not on my phone
              So not jealous and not disadvantaged

              What I will correctly predict is the iPhone7S will have a different design as 3 years and then change


                • D
                • AnonD-402029
                • tVv
                • 10 Sep 2016

                cant wait for the review

                  What is most amazing about this article is single core score of 3233. My desktop i7 3770k ivy bridge considered server type cpu beast back in 2012 still relevant these days and very powerful processor, scores 3800 in single core test. A10 fusion is a beast slaughter chip, just unbelievable how fast it is :)

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • JE0
                    • 09 Sep 2016

                    Simon, 09 Sep 2016That is completely not true. I used to think that way also,... moreIf you were a software developer you would know that that is not the case. Sure you could hand off simple background task to multiple core but those can easily be handle by one powerful core (which Anandtech also mention). Most applications will have one main thread, this is the important one for performance.

                    It is simple not possible to solve every task using multi threads, its a fact! As soon as you have to run things sequentially it won't matter how many cores you have, the single thread performance is all that matters.

                    Try running games for example on a power desktop computer with fewer but faster cores vs a powerful server with slower but alot more cores. Guess which one will be faster...
                    On the other hand if you run a web server on those same machines that is handling hundreds of simultaneous requests the result will be a much different story.
                    What scenario do you thing resembles the load you will have on a mobile OS? The desktop or the server load?...

                    But this does not even matter now since the two cores of the A10 are so fast that they will do the same work as the 4 cores in the exynos.

                      • D
                      • AnonD-451592
                      • ajP
                      • 09 Sep 2016

                      Trooper, 09 Sep 2016And these dedicated cameras with 'like 250mb ram' have dual... morePhones have an big operating system to run

                        • S
                        • Simon
                        • NU0
                        • 09 Sep 2016

                        Simon, 09 Sep 2016That is completely not true. I used to think that way also,... moreHeck, even the UI on Android is heavily threaded!

                          • S
                          • Simon
                          • NU0
                          • 09 Sep 2016

                          Anonymous, 09 Sep 2016Its a benchmark test, 4 cores runs slower than 2 in this ca... moreThat is completely not true. I used to think that way also, but Android became exemplary at multithreading, and unden even most CPU-intensive tasks, it will take full advantage of as many cores as you throw at it in most common apps (all Google apps and services, including mobile Chrome!), thus 8-core CPUs are in use and make actual sense. Anand made an excellent article/analysis on this, Google it, it's very interesting and eye-opening read (it was to me).
                          I checked it by myself running Android on a semi-custom ARM system of 16 very slow A7 cores, all fully utilized during heavy load on all workloads (even Pokemon Go!) I could test except a few apps that would use only 4-8 cores fully.

                            • s
                            • some1
                            • mAN
                            • 09 Sep 2016

                            S6 edge Android 6.0.1 ( GeekBench 4 ) :
                            Single score : 1410
                            Multi score: 4300

                            I think I'll choose iPhone 7 this time.

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • JE0
                              • 09 Sep 2016

                              Anonymous, 09 Sep 20164 cores runs slower than 2 cores to balance battery life wh... moreIts a benchmark test, 4 cores runs slower than 2 in this case simply because they are weaker. Apple is so far ahead of the competition right now that even the best possible scenario for a multicore CPU, heavy load on all cores (which pretty much never happens in real applications) is not enough to pull ahead.

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • xj5
                                • 09 Sep 2016

                                Zune, 09 Sep 2016Dude, look at geekbench 4 not 3, the a10 scores are for gee... more4 cores runs slower than 2 cores to balance battery life which is why apple scores higher per core overall they are roughly the same

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • JE0
                                  • 09 Sep 2016

                                  Anonymous, 09 Sep 2016Customized and the latter means the same thing all phones r... moreWell, that is not how it sounded in the post I quoted to and as you can see from the answer from "Igor Carvalho" its not how he interpreted it either since he says "I know ARM desing the chips". ARM is not designing the chip, Apple is. It's is not customized ARM reference cores was my point.

                                    • D
                                    • AnonD-97496
                                    • iTW
                                    • 09 Sep 2016

                                    AnonD-514012, 09 Sep 2016So what is the GeekBench 4 result of Note7?2330 and 5360 for Single and Multi core respectively... Apple as always trounces the competition in single core benchmarks, and an Octa-core SD performs about the same as a dual-core A-series processor.

                                      • Z
                                      • Zune
                                      • 4QB
                                      • 09 Sep 2016

                                      Anonymous, 09 Sep 2016Did you know apple chips are customized ARM and manufacture... moreNvidia's graphics chips are manufactured by tsmc, but that does not mean anything, does it? Quit the "Apple does not make anything, everyone else don't for them" talk, just show how stupid you are

                                        • Z
                                        • Zune
                                        • 4QB
                                        • 09 Sep 2016

                                        Anonymous, 09 Sep 2016You know that exynos and snapdragon scores better on becnhm... moreDude, look at geekbench 4 not 3, the a10 scores are for geekbench 4, on geek bench 4, snappy 820 scores 1800 and 4000, while 8890 scores 1900-2000 and 5500, a10 kicks 820s ass easily, and beats exynos on single core scores by 1.7 times, multicore scores are the same even though only 2 cores are used during benchmark, so what does this mean? A10 is the fastest SoC this year, even faster than the snappy 821 which is not yet on the market