Snapdragon 8150 CPU details surface

24 November 2018
The leak confirms the new 1 + 3 + 4 core, tri-clusted design that Qualcomm is moving to.

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • 4QP
  • 30 Nov 2018

Nicolas F, 28 Nov 2018Maybe you can explain, why "that makes no sense"? =)You need to go back to the begginning of that thread of messages and drop your bias to understand why

    AnonD-731363, 28 Nov 2018Yes it did. Its a fastest CPU at the moment. A lot faster... moreI assume you mixed up A12 and A12X, the latter is much more powerful.

      • D
      • AnonD-731363
      • SH3
      • 28 Nov 2018

      HugoSteger, 28 Nov 2018Then where's your proof then? Benchmarks said that but we both have to wait for officials results at 4th december.

        AnonD-731363, 28 Nov 2018Yes it did. Its a fastest CPU at the moment. A lot faster... moreThen where's your proof then?

          • D
          • AnonD-731363
          • SH3
          • 28 Nov 2018

          Anonymous, 26 Nov 2018"its a lot faster than A12 bionic from that overpriced appl... moreBenchmarks said that.

            • D
            • AnonD-731363
            • SH3
            • 28 Nov 2018

            HugoSteger, 26 Nov 2018Did it beat A12X? Yes it did. Its a fastest CPU at the moment.
            A lot faster than the second most fastest A12 bionic.

              Anonymous, 28 Nov 2018That makes no sense.... But okMaybe you can explain, why "that makes no sense"? =)

                • ?
                • Anonymous
                • 4QP
                • 28 Nov 2018

                Nicolas F, 27 Nov 2018Oh, so you can justify the overly high performance of moder... moreThat makes no sense.... But ok

                  [deleted post]Oh, so you can justify the overly high performance of modern "flagship" SoCs for smartphones? Otherwise, it's your remark that was pointless =)

                    AnonD-415644, 25 Nov 2018It's like seeing top speed of a new car. Sure it is not the... more..which is just pointless)

                      Shanti Dope, 25 Nov 2018By your logic, the Galaxy Note 9 should've used the SD660 i... more..and SD660 would run these apps good :)

                      Also SGN9 should've had flat screen and convenient placement of fingerprint reader.

                        AnonD-731363, 24 Nov 2018Well humans do mistakes. For me is enough knowing its a l... moreDid it beat A12X?

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • X%V
                          • 26 Nov 2018

                          I wish any company would come out with a processor same powerful as Apple A12X & they could include visual cores(like pixels) along with ISP& DSP.in Android flagship segment,there is monopoly of Qualcomm.If this news is true,then it will be a disappointment & lot of people will be happy seeing the upgraded benchmark test,while the benchmark apps will simply take money from Qualcomm & other OEMs & show huge boost in every segment.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • GX3
                            • 26 Nov 2018

                            AnonD-731363, 24 Nov 2018Well humans do mistakes. For me is enough knowing its a l... more"its a lot faster than A12 bionic from that overpriced apple"

                            How exactly did you reach that conclusion?

                              hahaha and they thought they are going to beat Apple

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • Kx1
                                • 26 Nov 2018

                                O S, 25 Nov 2018This 10.5MB L2 cache would be awesome and would compete wel... moreCache is expensive. Even Intel stayed in 8mb cache for mainstream DESKTOP for a loooooooong time and only add more when amd started threatening their market share.

                                Bigger cache will also increase latency slightly reducing overall performance, while increasing power consumption. but when cache to small for an app, there will be huge performance penalty. Multitasking also love bigger cache. Finding balance between these factor and cost production is what SoC maker tried to do.

                                  • Moj
                                  • 0p}
                                  • 26 Nov 2018

                                  erki, 25 Nov 2018The fastest core that is reserved for bechmarks ;) Serious... morewell not quite true(statement about benchmarks)
                                  that single core is just for most of app's that only uses one tread(the problem curently we face even in PC OSs which can lead to ie: a 24 core intel xeon lose the game of running programes to a core i7 with 8 core just becuse of single tread higher performance of that i7) also a lot of devs are too much lazy to go for more then 1 core(or at best 2 tread if there is HT)
                                  about UI, that might even being tasked to those very low power cores, cause it is not that much heavy(in pure android) and runs allways. thats why it is good idea, this task be given to a low power core!

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • nps
                                    • 25 Nov 2018

                                    Disappointment.
                                    Slight increase in performance as usual.
                                    Not a big jump.

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • 4QP
                                      • 25 Nov 2018

                                      Anonymous, 25 Nov 2018speed is important but power is still left behind, v16 engi... moreAs opposed to??

                                        • O
                                        • O S
                                        • xtS
                                        • 25 Nov 2018

                                        Kiyasuriin, 25 Nov 2018true. I personally think: 2MB for large core, 1.5MB for me... moreThis 10.5MB L2 cache would be awesome and would compete well with Apple A12 Bionic 8MB L2 cache; since the L2 cache is a documented bottleneck that cripples Qualcomm SoC compared to Apple SoC.