Samsung Galaxy S10+ with 12 GB RAM reaches impressive benchmark scores
- Kiyasuriin
- nYT
- 15 Feb 2019
Not impressed... SINGLE CORE sure gives a punch. But only 9.6k for Multi? I'd, rather get the SD855 NOTE 10 If so. - _-
- ?
- Anonymous
- 8pc
- 15 Feb 2019
AnonD-731363, 15 Feb 2019Still worse than Lenovo Z5 Pro GT for only 400 bucks. Sha... moreWhat,you didn't use it to judge...
- G
- Gnetha
- w6V
- 15 Feb 2019
Seriously! Does the phone manufacturers realize what percent of the customers who chose your flagship models are actually utilizing all these features to 100%? And what is the percent age of the people who prefer to buy the flagship models?
Improvement should also be shown in the MRP of the models besides PERFORMANCE.
- u
- unknown
- mpU
- 15 Feb 2019
AnonD-731363, 15 Feb 2019Still worse than Lenovo Z5 Pro GT for only 400 bucks. Sha... morethat phone is soo damn bad.. ! only thing that he have is ram and proccesor.! rest of it its not even there! nothing else is there! not even the design.. is huge bad materials.. looks like a 150 dolars phone on the back.. no jack no wireless no nfc nothing display quality sucks.. just dont pring in comparation with the samsung one cose that is half of a samsung! if ure blind to look only a top proccesor and a steroids ram than go buy that one.!
- Kiyasuriin
- nYT
- 15 Feb 2019
Anonymous, 15 Feb 2019Android chips are at least two years behind what Apple have.How so? The Exynos chip beats the iPhone X single core wise. And reaches the lower border of scores that an iPhone 8 achieves. Those, devices are LAST YEAR devices. So yes. Qualcomm is indeed 2 Years behind but Samsung is One. Please be accurate
- T
- The last Oracle
- vIY
- 15 Feb 2019
Anonymous, 15 Feb 2019Android chips are at least two years behind what Apple have.And that's why Apple prices its phones so high with mediocre accessories, no fast charging in the box, no headphone pin, no expandable storage, very little free cloud, limitations on bluetooth transfers, intentional slowing down of phones with software etc etc. Also before the iPhone Xs Max even the camera was mediocre. Myners that why its users people are called sheep.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Scq
- 15 Feb 2019
Android chips are at least two years behind what Apple have.
- B
- BiyoBiyo JunJun
- bJb
- 15 Feb 2019
Furiounx, 15 Feb 2019Wow! They're finally up to 2017's iPhone X scores! -_-thats why they compare with iphone 6
- B
- BiyoBiyo JunJun
- bJb
- 15 Feb 2019
Anonymous, 15 Feb 2019Unnecessary ..... Even with 100 apps open, not even 4Gb ... moreremember ... "higher is better" slogan
- ?
- Anonymous
- LQu
- 15 Feb 2019
AnonD-731363, 15 Feb 2019Still worse than Lenovo Z5 Pro GT for only 400 bucks.
Sha... moreTell us what this lenovo has that is better.......
Audio, camera, screen, software, updates, features? I am curious
- ?
- Anonymous
- LQu
- 15 Feb 2019
Unnecessary .....
Even with 100 apps open, not even 4Gb is used.
The are great sd card (from samsung mainly) fast enough to keep videos and photos.
- D
- AnonD-731363
- SH3
- 15 Feb 2019
Still worse than Lenovo Z5 Pro GT for only 400 bucks.
Shame on shammesung.
- p
- phill88
- 3DR
- 15 Feb 2019
Shanti Dope, 15 Feb 2019Um, which phone got 12,000 multi-core score in GeekBench ag... morethe xperia xz4, and I bet the xperia doesn't have 12gb of RAM
- ?
- Anonymous
- JhM
- 15 Feb 2019
Shanti Dope, 15 Feb 2019Um, which phone got 12,000 multi-core score in GeekBench ag... moreIt was the Sony xz4 with sd855. It might not be real though...
- S
- Shanti Dope
- sxr
- 15 Feb 2019
Um, which phone got 12,000 multi-core score in GeekBench again?? All I know is that it's the SD855....
- p
- paul
- naP
- 15 Feb 2019
sorry but 320k at antutu is not so impressive.
My Xiaomi mi8 has a score of 301k and cost only 350 euro...that is impressive