AnTuTu tests Snapdragon 730 and 665, has good and bad news

11 April 2019
The 730 is up to 25% faster than a 710, but the G version disappoints despite higher clocks. The 665, meanwhile, struggles to beat the old 660.

Sort by:

temp, 11 Apr 2019what is bad newsiPhone users must pay 850EUR for a phone with such a CPU :D

    • C
    • Couch expert
    • nC4
    • 11 Apr 2019

    That whole table lineup is a mess on Qualcomm's side IMO... Practically every Snapdragon SOC after the 615-810 disaster is a banger for the money but the numbering scheme is all over the place now

      Kangal, 11 Apr 2019Overall, the QSD 730 is the best and the QSD 660 is the wor... moreSmh greedy qualcomm made the 665 for same reason as nvidia made the gtx 1660 - to make people think - and especially phone manufacturers - think that it is the upgrade to the 660 and thus price the phones with 665 at the same money as those 2 year old ones with 660 ( instead of using the new 730/g )

        Alex 94, 11 Apr 2019Just get pocophone f1 with sd 845 for 270 bucks, or upcomin... moreI would take the 670 over the 675 any day for gaming personally, but some like higher fps with low quality and resolution, so for those the 675 is the best ( especially for pubg at 60 fps smooth~medium ).

          • n
          • nicolasmart
          • Sc{
          • 11 Apr 2019

          temp, 11 Apr 2019what is bad newsThe bad news is that the Snapdragon 665's raw processing power is generally quite worse than the one of the OG Snapdragon 660

            Yuupi, finally some midrange SoCs which have faster graphics than my old snapdragon 820. So to my understanding - you need 8nm technology to use the full power of a adreno 530 gpu lol. My phone always runs the gpu at the lowest frequency to prevent overheating due to the crappy cpu and 14nm arch ( so it uses 20% gpu max ).

              Just get pocophone f1 with sd 845 for 270 bucks, or upcoming f2 with sd 855 for about 350 bucks starting price and problem solved. To many chips with so little difference,and u will lack some features with every- 660,665,670,675,710,712,730.If someone must take one of these,go for Sd 730,Sd 730G or sd 675.

                • ?
                • Anonymous
                • Ld9
                • 11 Apr 2019

                Anonymous, 11 Apr 2019Exynos 9610 >>> SD665nah, trash Exynos

                its CPU is about on par with 660 at best, but GPU is worse

                  Even if the 665 turns out to be slightly slower in some areas compared to the 660, don't forget the DSP and ISP power that the chip offers over the 660. If they are put to good use, that would be a compromise I would be willing to make.

                    • t
                    • temp
                    • ssc
                    • 11 Apr 2019

                    what is bad news

                      • h
                      • hmm
                      • pI@
                      • 11 Apr 2019

                      Shanti Dope, 11 Apr 2019Or invest for a SD835 device with GPU that's superior to an... moreWhy sd835 when you get SD845 with same price range or as with Pocophone F1 even cheaper. If you can find new phones with SD835 or are not that old that dont get updated anymore

                        Vasra, 11 Apr 2019So, for gaming, get SD730(G) or SD670 (or perhaps SD675), n... moreOr invest for a SD835 device with GPU that's superior to any mid range SoC

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • uvI
                          • 11 Apr 2019

                          Exynos 9610 >>> SD665

                            • f
                            • falcon
                            • 2F6
                            • 11 Apr 2019

                            chips makers ..formula...one step forward...consumers two steps backwards

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • fv3
                              • 11 Apr 2019

                              kryaags, 11 Apr 2019The Snapdragon 670 has a better GPU than the 675, but a wea... moreBetter GPU
                              weaker CPU

                                • s
                                • sahafiec
                                • d%$
                                • 11 Apr 2019

                                "The Snapdragon 670 has a better GPU than the 675, but a weaker GPU."
                                two times GPU seems not really intended, or am I wrong?!

                                  The Snapdragon 670 has a better GPU than the 675, but a weaker GPU... this line needs correction

                                    So, for gaming, get SD730(G) or SD670 (or perhaps SD675), not the others. Of course, depending on specific gaming support for each.

                                      The Interpretation of this Chart is Incorrect.

                                      The new processors have larger and smaller cores. The new arrangement ensures that heat management and energy management are excellent. Since the design of the ill fated Snapdragon 810, and especially since the 855, Snapdragon has been trying to ensure that the lower cores can run for much longer since they handle the majority of workload, even the very heavy ones. The highest clocked cores are terrible with energy and heat. This test is not comprehensive enough and is not a good test of actual use, speed, heat and battery management.

                                      Plus interestingly the 8nm cores are literally Samsung trademark dye size. Meaning that they have been (designed by Snapdragon and) manufactured by Samsung.

                                      Very interesting. Plus they have a new neural engine for the next generation of complex tests.

                                        The Snapdragon 670 has a better GPU* than the 675, but a weaker GPU*. So it would be up to smartphone makers to prioritize performance in games or in apps..............need corrections at asterisk @GSMARENA

                                          3 of 4