AnTuTu's Huawei Mate 30 Pro performance splits S855 and S855+ phones
- M
- MadMel
- d%{
- 20 Sep 2019
AnonD-558092, 20 Sep 2019Please read the second part of my comment. "Well it's al... moreevery part of your comment is misleading, ain't gonna read that rubbish again.
- S
- S8 9.0
- nvy
- 20 Sep 2019
huawei as always shitty with their processors
- D
- AnonD-558092
- IBL
- 20 Sep 2019
Kangal, 20 Sep 2019I have to say, I like the arrangement of Huawei's 2+2+4 mor... moreBut technically Qualcomm has a point about using a Prime core. Tons of apps are still not multithreaded and having a huge core for them is a good solution. Eventually, the Prime core will become useless as more apps get support for multithreading. However it will remain super useful for emulation.
- D
- AnonD-558092
- IBL
- 20 Sep 2019
MadMel, 20 Sep 2019don't hurt yourself with SD855+ cheerleading , everything a... morePlease read the second part of my comment.
"Well it's also just benchmarks too and not representative of hands-on, real performance"
- D
- AnonD-558092
- IBL
- 20 Sep 2019
Akaike, 20 Sep 2019Salty fanboy. Alot of you thought the kirin 990 wouldn't be... moreI never said that. But go on with your groundless assumptions. You're only making a fool of yourself
- B
- Boldy
- rxi
- 20 Sep 2019
Kangal, 20 Sep 2019I have to say, I like the arrangement of Huawei's 2+2+4 mor... moreThis is actually going to just cement Qualcomm's lead. The Kirin 980 was almost the same performance tier as the 855, which was great for the competition this year. The 990 however continues to use the cortex A76 cores rather than A77 which the 865 (?) will use.
I fully expect the 865 to crush this one into oblivion.
- F
- Fade.
- nmM
- 20 Sep 2019
Akaike, 20 Sep 2019Salty fanboy. Alot of you thought the kirin 990 wouldn't be... moreIt's supposed to beat 855. It's meant to compete against next years Snapdragon and Apples a13 bionic. It's still slightly behind in that way. But they have come a long way since Kirin 950 or so. Now they're not 2 generations behind. Now they're barely 1 generation behind and soon they could be even. Good for them because competition is needed. It pushes Qualcomm to try harder and that is a good thing.
- D
- AnonD-794992
- 0sW
- 20 Sep 2019
Cyberchum, 20 Sep 2019Huawei fanboys, this is for you. Funny, im huawei fan but i agree kirin never was the top cpu compared to the competition. What i found funny is how peopole who troll, who are provocative and insult other brands are called fanboys.
Those peopole are everything but fans? NO
haters would be appropriate name for them.
- N
- Neelabh
- rJF
- 20 Sep 2019
Atleast Huawei's catching up with Snapdragons
- D
- DavidRegalJnr
- r3H
- 20 Sep 2019
Like I've said before..Antutu only favours Chinese brands..The A series should be in the 500 range at worst..Kirin suck actually,only because they're Chinese made because Antutu started the score of 980 way over 300 last year and suddenly dropped it to it's rightful position in 200 range.The A77 would have really been ideal here but the gpu is still sd 845s at best.I use a mate 20 x fyi
- vrvly
- g5f
- 20 Sep 2019
Cyberchum, 20 Sep 2019Huawei fanboys, this is for you. If you were a fanboy you would know this long before... and you wouldn't care since real performance also matters. Even exynos is behind, but only as whole raw power, some parts are better.
- N
- Nick Tagataka
- gRx
- 20 Sep 2019
"Also, AnTuTu reports that there may have been some power-saving mode interfering with the results"
Then I'll simply wait for it to come out to the market and receive the stable version of the firmware, until then I won't judge anything. Plain and simple.
- G
- Gobinath
- D06
- 20 Sep 2019
Anyone know y Huawei didn't use cortex A77 and mali G77 GPU?. Snapdragon fanboys going to blame mali GPU for huawei's mistake...😂
- Kangal
- RN8
- 20 Sep 2019
I have to say, I like the arrangement of Huawei's 2+2+4 moreso than Qualcomm's 1+3+4, just based on thread behaviour in Android. It's still much better than MediaTek's 2+4+4 arrangement, in fact, I would actually prefer a 3+5 (A78+A58 or A76/A55) instead.
Overall, I think the Snapdragon 855 is still using slightly better DSP, GPU, Antennas, etc etc, and more efficient. But this really has bridged most of the gap. In fact, I wouldn't be sad to have a new phone with either the Exynos 9825, Kirin 980, Kirin 990, QSD 855, QSD 855 Plus SoC inside my device, though I would prefer the latter rather than former.
Let's hope Samsung delivers properly with the next-gen Exynos (9870 ?) and Qualcomm continues to challenge Apple's A11-A12-A13 Bionic chips in the coming 3-6 months.
- A
- Akaike
- Ivd
- 20 Sep 2019
AnonD-558092, 20 Sep 2019That's... pretty underwhelming. As fast as the A13 in the i... moreSalty fanboy. Alot of you thought the kirin 990 wouldn't beat the snapdragon 855. Eat your words!
- r
- realitychecker
- I@a
- 20 Sep 2019
I don't judge a phone's soc by its antutu benchmarks.. but hey those are pretty interesting numbers from the 4G version of K990...