Samsung Galaxy Buds+ review

02 March 2020
Samsung brings improved battery life and call experience for a small price increase.

Sort by:

  • YRDN
  • 3FJ
  • 02 Mar 2020

AnonD-908380, 02 Mar 2020The original buds don't have 400mAh either. They wrote 400m... moreCheers, mate,

I got confused with mA vs. mAh, I should wear my glasses more often.

Fixed everything in the article. Thanks to everyone for the comments.

    • D
    • AnonD-908380
    • nfy
    • 02 Mar 2020

    YRDN, 02 Mar 2020Hi there, TJM, The 600 mAh capacity is written on the bo... moreThe original buds don't have 400mAh either. They wrote 400mA as charging info on the bottom with the originals though.

      • S
      • Sharma_Ji
      • rKY
      • 02 Mar 2020

      [deleted post]And there's no way a 270 mah battery can charge 2x85mah cells 2 times, the calculation directly doesn't add up, leave the efficiency of discharging and charging aside.

      Must not be 270mah, samsung website has it incorrect.

        • YRDN
        • 3FJ
        • 02 Mar 2020

        AnonD-908380, 02 Mar 2020Indeed. No idea how they came up with that...Hi there, TJM,

        The 600 mAh capacity is written on the bottom side of the cradle. We've contacted Samsung reps to explain where the massive discrepancy comes from, in the meantime, I've edited the text for clarity.

          • D
          • AnonD-908380
          • nfy
          • 02 Mar 2020

          [deleted post]Indeed. No idea how they came up with that...

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • tSu
            • 02 Mar 2020

            Check Samsung product page specs about battery capasity.
            Gsmarena got it wrong.

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • K8x
              • 02 Mar 2020

              The big difference is that Samsung managed to cram 50% more battery in the case - it now has 600mAh instead of 400mAh. Wrong.
              Check out samsung website

                • t
                • themohd
                • ni{
                • 02 Mar 2020

                Unlike what the review mentions that the original buds have "non-existent bass", mine do have good bass to them. My only problem is when I'm eating and listening to something, a gap forms and ruins the experience.

                  • D
                  • AnonD-908380
                  • nfy
                  • 02 Mar 2020

                  They look so cheap and crappy with the glossy finish. Why did they not keep the matt finish from the originals...

                    Hilmawan, 02 Mar 2020For me Galaxy Buds+ looks weird in a bad waynobody will ever copy this ... with good reason.

                      • D
                      • AnonD-762416
                      • JGv
                      • 02 Mar 2020

                      Hilmawan, 02 Mar 2020For me Galaxy Buds+ looks weird in a bad wayI prefer not looking like I have something hanging from my ear. Small and discrete looks way better than a misplaced hygiene product.

                        For me Galaxy Buds+ looks weird in a bad way

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • K8x
                          • 02 Mar 2020

                          Quote: I truly hoped the Korean company would finally fix the massive flaws that I was living with in the past twelve months. End quote.
                          What flaws???
                          I own 2 pair of previous buds - no flaws at all.
                          Mostly good call quality, only a issue when very windy.
                          Extra bass is easy to get, it's called poweramp music player with +6db preamp, and 10 band Equalizer.
                          Buds+ sell for $50 more than former Buds.