Apple AirPods Studio's premium version will cost $600
- S
- Scot
- TKt
- 10 Oct 2020
Hehe, 10 Oct 2020 Bruh, AirPods Pro has pretty good sound quality nglYup, I agree. The sound quality is good and they are comfortable and easy to use.
Tens of millions of people are very happy with them.
- ?
- Anonymous
- ntJ
- 10 Oct 2020
Hehe, 10 Oct 2020 Bruh, AirPods Pro has pretty good sound quality nglGood joke!
- ?
- Anonymous
- fIP
- 10 Oct 2020
Hehe, 10 Oct 2020 Bruh, AirPods Pro has pretty good sound quality nglPretty good only but not for the price they're asking
You can get amazing sound headphones with the price outside of Apple
- ?
- Anonymous
- gxd
- 10 Oct 2020
Apple can manipulate their users with advertisements, but they will not manipulate Rtings on this one. I bet this headphone will be too expensive for his performance.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7ti
- 10 Oct 2020
iOS Never Again, 10 Oct 2020Shhhh.... Don't tell anyone about those brands as this... moreBeats don't sound good either
- Q
- Q
- wrb
- 10 Oct 2020
Hehe, 10 Oct 2020 Bruh, AirPods Pro has pretty good sound quality nglHave u ever use ATH-M50x?
It is only around US$110 in my country (brand new) and it has blown ALL the Beats released up to date.
I have ATH-M50x & personally compare it with Beats headphone display in Audio store (which means it has been burned), which priced more than 4x ATH-M50x, and it was really sucks; it was decent at most for watching movies, but absolutely not music.
- R
- Rk100
- 6v0
- 10 Oct 2020
Anonymous, 09 Oct 2020Except they are meant for audiophiles, musicians and record... moreBut what about the standard model?
- Q
- Q
- wrb
- 10 Oct 2020
Fearghast, 10 Oct 2020They do, for 50 bucks headphones ... but they are not 50 do... moreIt's not 'incompetent', but 'intentional'.
Apple's policy since C(r)ook became the CEO is 'BoM (bill of material) as low as possible, profit as high as possible'.
The current Apple is depending on the 'trust' built by Jobs of 'Apple = quality', while in fact, most of their cost actually spent on marketing propaganda which, most of the time, are complete bullshit (high-quality BUT bendable ipad, sapphire lens which actually scratched, hoax better battery life for each new SoC (iphone 8 vs SE2), etc).
No audiophiles don't know how notorious Apple's 'accessories' qualities are;
Notoriously low-grade charging cable, ancient & low-grade 5w charger which BoM only cost $2~3, impossible to fix airpods battery which also have low-capacity, gimmicky expensive wireless charger, etc.
- Fearghast
- nt{
- 10 Oct 2020
Hehe, 10 Oct 2020 Bruh, AirPods Pro has pretty good sound quality nglThey do, for 50 bucks headphones ... but they are not 50 dollar headphones, are they?
Not to mention their RMA ratio! Have you seen that? Talk about incompetency to design and manufacture headphones.
- 7
- 7urku
- my$
- 10 Oct 2020
Kotaro, 10 Oct 2020Audio technica or AKG much better than this overprice junk. Even the #SkullCandyCrusher its Better Than Them:)))
- H
- Hehe
- uRE
- 10 Oct 2020
iOS Never Again, 10 Oct 2020Shhhh.... Don't tell anyone about those brands as this... more Bruh, AirPods Pro has pretty good sound quality ngl
- m
- mixedfish
- imn
- 10 Oct 2020
AnonD-762416, 10 Oct 2020If they use some sort of proprietary wireless connection to... moreIt won't because Apple users are stuck on poor man SBC/AAC codecs.
All this talk about how wireless is the 'future' and yet these codecs are from the 90's.
- ?
- Anonymous
- C9a
- 10 Oct 2020
Anonymous, 09 Oct 2020It's a luxury product I don't know why people d... moredear, oh dear, why would anybody criticize Gucci, LV or Hermes?
- iOS Never Again
- 7kY
- 10 Oct 2020
Kotaro, 10 Oct 2020Audio technica or AKG much better than this overprice junk. Shhhh.... Don't tell anyone about those brands as this will burst the bubble Apple users live in about premium sound quality.
- K
- Kotaro
- PA7
- 10 Oct 2020
Audio technica or AKG much better than this overprice junk.
- D
- AnonD-762416
- ptP
- 10 Oct 2020
If they use some sort of proprietary wireless connection to get around the bandwidth limit over Bluetooth, a pair of 600 buck headphones is maybe justifiable. If they're limited to Bluetooth, this is going to be Apple's next big scam, because even if they would use drivers on par with other 600 buck headphones the real-world bandwidth is much lower than 16-bit lossless audio (taking real-world radio noise, you touching the antennae, etc. into account). You'd essentially pay a lot of money to appreciate better detail of digital noise.
- ?
- Anonymous
- m2J
- 10 Oct 2020
For up to this price point you have so much different all types of headphones for what ever use you need. Never mind these dont look like they are built to be very strong and for now audio port to make them wired dont make these last long too. When it's battery will die out then the full headset is just paperweight. If you go for them for the design then you can even get same design or similar design for 1/3 of the price from some brand that is dedicated audio product.
But as it is Apple then these probably cost 60 euro and apple price them as 600 for maximum profit and world is full of these people who buy it just cause it's apple and they have too much money to actually care about the sound quality, product durability and how long it will last
- k
- kek
- GBh
- 10 Oct 2020
Imagine paying 600$ for this when a lot of good Sony & Bose Headphones costs like half this price