Snapdragon 875 in Galaxy S21 benchmarked, but the Exynos 2100 might be the one to have

17 November 2020
The SD875-powered phone has a 3,375 multi-core score, reports are the CPU on the Exynos 2100 could get that to 4,000.

Sort by:

Mediatek sux, 30 Nov 2020Yes it is a lot, with as much increase in tdp too.Hmm? SoC power of Mac Mini 32w. APU power of 4800u 25w. 🤔

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • gya
    • 01 Dec 2020

    Mediatek sux, 30 Nov 2020Oh really? And you think the whole system power of the 4800... moreIt is. SOC power means GPU. CPU. RAM. CPU power means IGPU if it has one and the cpu cores

      • S
      • Supa
      • gya
      • 01 Dec 2020

      Mediatek sux, 30 Nov 2020It wins in single core compared to amd, and multi core comp... moreIf you want single core. Just buy intle. It beats M1. If you want multiform. Get AMD. It beats M1.

        SupaSiblings, 30 Nov 2020M1 MacMini is here so we can just use that, and yah, but Ap... moreOh they told that? Good thing i dont believe in claims before seeing actual tests then.

          SupaSiblings, 30 Nov 2020M1 doesent win, whether it be R23, or Geekbench 5,It wins in single core compared to amd, and multi core compared to intel. Going by your logic, none of the chips 'win'.

          Why are you even bringing up geekbench now after all that talk about how inaccurate it is? In gb5 m1 even beats 5950x in single core and 4900hs in multi.

            SupaSiblings, 30 Nov 2020Yes, the while system I was talking about, dummy, and yeah,... moreOh really? And you think the whole system power of the 4800u device is just 18w?

              SupaSiblings, 30 Nov 20204000 R23 multi points isn't "not alot" isn&#... moreYes it is a lot, with as much increase in tdp too.

                SupaSiblings, 30 Nov 2020Apple M1 gets 30 or more wattage during benchmarks, and if ... moreM1 is 24w at most, thats the estimate from the mac mini, with 7.8k cinebench multi. Theres even this video of macbook m1 with 11 to 8w with scores of 7.4 to 6.4k in cinebench multi.
                https://youtu.be/S-dOB326mlY

                And the 4900hs of 35w tdp gets 11.2k multi. I couldnt find anything that shows power usage during the cinebench run. If its actually using full 35w, and compared to 24w m1. You tell me how much higher 11.2k is than 7.8k. you also tell me how much 35 is more than 24.

                  Mediatek sux, 29 Nov 2020'WRONG, also its not 10 points,, 60 points is a pretty... more4000 R23 multi points isn't "not alot" isn't it?

                    Mediatek sux, 29 Nov 2020'WRONG, also its not 10 points,, 60 points is a pretty... moreYes, the while system I was talking about, dummy, and yeah, but 18w 4800u is still more,

                      Mediatek sux, 29 Nov 2020'WRONG, also its not 10 points,, 60 points is a pretty... moreM1 doesent win, whether it be R23, or Geekbench 5,

                        Mediatek sux, 29 Nov 2020'WRONG, also its not 10 points,, 60 points is a pretty... moreM1 MacMini is here so we can just use that, and yah, but Apple claimed they have really good GPU performance, they claimed "better then a 1070" which is about equal to 2060 max q, there it released and it was only equal to 1050ti

                          Mediatek sux, 29 Nov 2020Everything above 4800u that has higher scores also have muc... moreApple M1 gets 30 or more wattage during benchmarks, and if you calculate it, it has lots more multi, almost 1.9x more, and 1.9x 30 is 57, but the 4900hs is 50w, Apple M1 is less efficient then the 4900hs,

                            Anonymous, 30 Nov 2020that's just utilisation a 32 core not optimised fo... moreAlso, this isnt games, this is a multicore benchmarks, which servers focus on multicore,

                              Anonymous, 30 Nov 2020that's just utilisation a 32 core not optimised fo... moreIf so, why does a 3950x ALSO lose to A12X?

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • n5a
                                • 30 Nov 2020

                                SupaSiblings, 23 Nov 2020Nope, it says here, A THIRTY FRIKIN TWO CORE CPU BY AMD LOS... morethat's just utilisation
                                a 32 core not optimised for games and other stuff in multiform
                                thats how intel stayed Ahead in must games even with 8 cores some times
                                simular stuff going on here

                                  SupaSiblings, 29 Nov 2020WRONG, also its not 10 points,, 60 points is a pretty big d... more'WRONG, also its not 10 points,, 60 points is a pretty big difference, ' yeah, thats what i said look at the numbers of all scores, not just the ones where intel or amd wins and call it "quite a lot" and not even bother mentioning the ones where m1 wins.

                                  Where did you get the tdp of apple m1 was 37-40w? Thats the power of the whole system, not the soc. Its tdp is around 20-24w. 4800u comes in various configurable tdp from 10 to 25w. Its 25w that gives that score.

                                  "it would be about 1.6x better then Apple in single core, and over 2x, better in multicore, Compare with watts, and theoretical performance if the other chips had the same max wattage, and nanometers, They have a 2nm advantage over AMD, and a 7nm advantage over Intel."

                                  Yeah, but they arent available now. Lets see when the actual product comes.

                                  "zephryus g14 has DLSS 2.0, and ryzen 5000 laptops will soon have rx 6000 and nvidia rtx 3000 series, with dlss and directml, which will probably beat the next 2 generations of Apple Mac laptop CPUs, (apple m2 and apple m3)"

                                  Yeah, dedicated gpu beating an soc. Big news.

                                    SupaSiblings, 29 Nov 2020Also the 4900hs destroy it in multi, and is pretty close in... moreEverything above 4800u that has higher scores also have much higher tdp, like double. Lookup what tdp is.

                                      SupaSiblings, 29 Nov 2020WRONG, also its not 10 points,, 60 points is a pretty big d... moreAlso the 4900hs destroy it in multi, and is pretty close in single to a 9980hk (helios 700) which overclockz to 5ghz, and a 5ghz 9980hk has very little point difference vs the i7 1185g7, and a 4.3ghz 4900hs is equal to 5ghz 9980hk in single, and thrashes it in multi. And the 9980hk is better then 1185g7 in multi,

                                        Mediatek sux, 28 Nov 2020And? You do know that m1 only supports r23? What do you eve... moreWRONG, also its not 10 points,, 60 points is a pretty big difference, Not to mention, Apple M1 is *not* 5w or 10wl 8w, or anything, When you push it in benchmarks to max, it goes from 37 to 40w, So with Intel vs Apple, its 28w vs 37-40w, and 14nm vs 5nm, vs AMD its 18W versus 37-40 watts, and 7nm vs 5nm, that's NOT impressive, let's say the ryzen also takes 37 to 40w, judging by the numbers of the 18w ryzen, it would be about 1.6x better then Apple in single core, and over 2x, better in multicore, Compare with watts, and theoretical performance if the other chips had the same max wattage, and nanometers, They have a 2nm advantage over AMD, and a 7nm advantage over Intel, and has lots more wattage headroom, Dont forget a 4900hs (zephyrus g14) with 50w destroys the Apple M1 GPU, not to mention the yet Intel still wins in Single, and the zephryus g14 has DLSS 2.0, and ryzen 5000 laptops will soon have rx 6000 and nvidia rtx 3000 series, with dlss and directml, which will probably beat the next 2 generations of Apple Mac laptop CPUs, (apple m2 and apple m3)

                                          4 of 12