Samsung Galaxy S II Plus benchmark confirms CPU, GPU
- D
- AnonD-68354
- vwu
- 12 Sep 2012
Anonymous, 11 Sep 2012Apple sues Polish online grocery store over 'A.pl'...BEWARE... moreWhoa (Cr)Apple that's really LOW! In their endless greed, (Cr)Apple has started suing anybody n everybody now! Suing a small time Polish grocery store 4 using the name A.pl, that SUX big time! It's natural 4 a Polish website 2 use the .pl suffix! Get a life u greedy, money-lusting morons (Cr)Apple! I really guess u will be suing Mother Nature next 4 producing the fruit apple n every1 who harvests n eats apples, not ur rotten stinking overpriced n overhyped (Cr)Apples! I guess it's April 1st 2day - APPLE FOOL'S DAY! Ha ha ha ha ha!
- ?
- Anonymous
- npV
- 12 Sep 2012
Samsung Galaxy S II Minus
- Z
- Zeno
- JxS
- 12 Sep 2012
Anonymous, 12 Sep 2012cough cough
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_tx_t_and_v... moreI think you missed the point that there are huge difference between benchmarks and real life experience and that Krait are nothing than a tweaked chip to fool benchmarks.
Sony's new phones use Krait chip exactly the ones in One S and S3 USA
As you can see here how Krait S4 lags while Exynos does not and slower in booting too!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_yAazP_VC8&feature=related
And those results i don't know how they have been maden here in GSMarena because i saw every plenty of videos on Youtube for benchmarks and Exynos always gives a better results.
So congratulation for your laggy chip as always from Qualcomm and i'm pretty sure even the Dual Exynos A9 is more powerful than Krait S4 A15 in real life too.
- B
- Blaze
- uH$
- 12 Sep 2012
Anonymous, 12 Sep 2012Except Samsung is the one that makes those so even Apple wo... moreSamsung just barely made it. The one that designs the chip is apple. So saying that apple would 'immediately' lose is as good as saying a factory in china has patent power over everything that you have.
- D
- AnonD-1846
- fj7
- 12 Sep 2012
AnonD-21921, 12 Sep 2012Well said!Do you own one Razr M now?It's available on US and soon to UK and the rest of the world.
- ?
- Anonymous
- q8Q
- 12 Sep 2012
AnonD-63709, 12 Sep 2012That's an architecture very similar to the iPad 3's GPU. I ... moreExcept Samsung is the one that makes those so even Apple would immediately lose that one
- j
- jprd
- LyW
- 12 Sep 2012
hey guys I m from Chile and I have the phone
is the same of tmobile
- a
- anonymau5
- thc
- 12 Sep 2012
AnonD-6628, 11 Sep 2012Are you really so naive? Nokia had Vertu so they should not... morecompletely irrelevant Vertu was owned by Nokia, but it was clearly not aimed for the majority of people.
Nokia phones each had special purpose e.g. E7 for business, N8 for its camera, C7 as a mid-end phone. meanwhile you have Samsung just milking the Galaxy name churning out the millionth galaxy phone every week.
- j
- john
- v66
- 12 Sep 2012
Jo, 12 Sep 2012Time to move on from my S3 to iPhone 5 :) Going back to such a small screen I think you will be very disappointed. Anyway, each to their own.
- D
- AnonD-40213
- Pcg
- 12 Sep 2012
I dont get it, Why use TI architecture, instead the own made Exynos one? personally althougt I already bought a SII recently I wont pay more for a model wich use foreing technology instead homemade one.
- S
- Samson, Mumbai
- u{6
- 12 Sep 2012
I would prefer that Samung come out with the SGS II with Jelly Bean. This would give a great advantage to the product and value for buyers.
- r
- raghu
- KSf
- 12 Sep 2012
if the GPU is PowerVR 544MP, then it might have TI OMAP 4470 chipset... and may be the leaked galaxy nexus 2 i9260 also has the same config...
its just my guess...
- J
- Jo
- IaH
- 12 Sep 2012
Time to move on from my S3 to iPhone 5 :)
- D
- AnonD-63709
- kxV
- 12 Sep 2012
That's an architecture very similar to the iPad 3's GPU. I bet you 50 bucks Apple going to throw another "patent" lawsuit at them.
- D
- AnonD-21921
- thg
- 12 Sep 2012
AnonD-1846, 12 Sep 2012Be specific. Samsung mid range are better than which mid ra... moreWell said!Do you own one Razr M now?
- D
- AnonD-69184
- fkV
- 12 Sep 2012
Anonymous, 12 Sep 2012cough cough http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_tx_t_and_v... moreBenchmarks don't take advantage of multi-cores so it's the like the S3 is only a dual-core.
- i
- iSJ5
- t7X
- 12 Sep 2012
lagdroid plastic-copy!
- D
- AnonD-61530
- v66
- 12 Sep 2012
Anonymous, 11 Sep 2012I thought the S3 was a budget phone when I felt its build q... moreYOUR KIDDING!!
I used a friends SGS3 the other day and the build quality was first class.
Streets ahead of my old SGS2 and current SG note.
If you are going to make stupid comments you should at least have used the phone. Just because its not all glass and steel and weighs a tonne doesn't mean the build quality isn't great.
- D
- AnonD-1846
- rwL
- 12 Sep 2012
Mobilemaster, 11 Sep 2012The S2+ is a mid-end device, not a high-end one. The S3 can... moreBe specific. Samsung mid range are better than which mid range phone?
This GS2+ cannot stand a chance with the Razr M from Motorola. It's looks like Moto Colorboost option make a big difference between the qHD for GS2+ and the qHD from Razr M.
First of all the Razr M get compared to the real high end phones like the GS3, HTC ONE X, iPhone 5. And the Razr M did beat the GS3 on Quadrant benchmark only but the Razr M beat the GS3 on 5 benchmarks options.
1. The GS3 have an highest ppi only but less colorful and brighter than the Razr M.
The Razr M beat the GS3 on brightness and color.
At 469 lux on our light meter, the Droid RAZR
M's screen is significantly brighter than the
296-lux smartphone category average, the
213-lux Samsung Galaxy S III and the 340-lux
Samsung Galaxy Nexus. The 610-lux LG Lucid
was brighter, though not as colorful.
2. On Quadrant benchmark the Razr M is a little close to the GS3 but beat other high end phones like the HTC Rezound. Razr M scored 7335 but the HTC Rezound 7331.
3. Razr M beat the GS3 on 5 benchmarks options.
* An3DBench
* Benchmark FileSystem
* Benchmark Graphics
* Display Brightness
* Benchmark Memory
4. Better Build Quality the Razr M is strong, durable, water resistant.
5. Battery Life
With its sealed-in 2,000 mAH battery, the Droid
RAZR M lasted a strong 6 hours and 56
minutes on the LAPTOP Battery test, which
involves continuous surfing over 4G. That time
is an hour longer than the category average
(5:53), nearly 2 hours longer than the LG Lucid
(5:04) and more than 3 hours longer than the
Samsung Galaxy Nexus (3:40). However, the
Samsung Galaxy S III lasted a nearly identical
6 hours and 55 minutes.
You can check out this information here
http://www.laptopmag.com/review/smartphones/droid-razr-m.aspx
Even More powerful the Razr M is even compared to the iPhone 5.
The bottom line is this: Motorola just came out
with a mid-level device that, from a feature-by-
feature comparison, ably competes with both
the iPhone 4S and the next-gen iPhone at a
price that will attract many smartphone buyers.
One smartphone aficionado asked after seeing
the Droid M, “Did Motorola just release the
iPhone 5 before Apple did?” Maybe close
enough.
Check out here :
http://www.readwriteweb.com/mobile/2012/09/motorolas-opportunity-droid-razr-m-vs-iphone-5.php
Many people are thinking the Razr M is a full idia off Google. No Moto was pregnant the Razr M, HD and the Razr HD Maxx. But the real Google Moto phone will come.
- ?
- Anonymous
- QCM
- 12 Sep 2012
Anonymous, 11 Sep 2012Now people realize Samsung phones are made in China too. Sa... moreat least Samsung prices its products reasonably VS Apple that prices products exorbitantly. they're both evil, but do you who the bigger evil is?