Sony announces A7 IV with 33-megapixel sensor and 4K 60 video

21 October 2021
Features significantly improved video capabilities for a true hybrid camera experience.

Sort by:

  • B
  • Bstrom
  • kpM
  • 27 Dec 2021

How or where did you determine the dual ISO at 3200? That seems ridiculously high unless it is designed to aid video recording. Can you confirm with a source for this spec?

    • D
    • AnonD-731363
    • SH3
    • 02 Nov 2021

    SuuperBaka, 02 Nov 2021"Man its working, I ordered from there so its must wo... moreMan i did not forgot and we still debate the same.
    I it would works for you i mean that site you could order your own cannon EOS R5 for 40 bucks plus 020 for delivery which means you get a lot better camera for lot cheaper than Sony A7.
    So man please stop circling in own lies and false argumens when its clearly clear.
    If that site not works for you its not mine problem for me it worked as i told before.


    And when comes to entry level cameras yes Nikon D3400 isa good example because for 400 bucks which this camera can be bought anywhere else Sony doesnt even try to sell comething comparable for same ammount of money.
    Entry level camera like A7 for 2500 bucks.
    Its not only funny its even worse than that.
    Its sounds as bad as it is.
    Since when a 2500 or 3000 with kit eur device can be considered as entry level device.

      AnonD-731363, 02 Nov 2021"And that site rhynchule.top there is Cannon EOS R5 fo... more"Man its working,
      I ordered from there so its must works."

      That's some faulty logic, I can easily claim you are lying to me.

      This is what I get when I click type it in.

      "This site can’t provide a secure connectionrhynchule.top sent an invalid response.
      ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR"

      So clearly it doesn't work.

      "Maybe your interent connection is as bad as your argumets."

      I can guarantee that my internet connection is not the problem, and I know for a fact that my arguments are better since I actually had one. You literally changed your stance so many times that you forgot what your initial argument was.

      Now you're lying about a website that doesn't work since you can't argue. Do you remember what your initial argument was? Canon and Nikon make better and cheaper cameras, entry-level cameras are $100-$500. I have yet to see an example of what you claimed and yet you still continue about things not relevant to your argument.

        • D
        • AnonD-731363
        • SH3
        • 02 Nov 2021

        SuuperBaka, 01 Nov 2021"Used ones??? I searched for new ones." You al... more"And that site rhynchule.top there is Cannon EOS R5 for only 40 bucks brand new."

        That site doesn't even work, you're getting scammed by them. The only thing you're getting is a broken R5 part for $40.

        Man its working,
        I ordered from there so its must works.
        Maybe your interent connection is as bad as your argumets.
        I know how you feeling and how you trying.
        Sony is a good brand with good devices but is ruled by greed.
        Anything they make they sell for 5-10 times compared the manzufacturing costs.
        Thats not only funny but ican be called as a crime.
        Greed rules this world and elading you people to doom you created by your doing.

          AnonD-731363, 31 Oct 2021Used ones??? I searched for new ones. and EOS R5 by Canno... more"Used ones??? I searched for new ones."

          You also mentioned used ones for cheaper than the Amazon listing you mentioned.
          "3800 eur on amazon" like you said.

          "and EOS R5 by Cannon is far beyound entry level like this Sony A7."

          If it's beyond entry level then why bring it up? You don't even know what you are arguing anymore.

          "Why you cant understand a simple thing i got you and proved you are wrong."

          You don't understand what you're even saying. You didn't prove me wrong, you proved yourself wrong. You said at the very beginning that Canon has a cheaper and better camera, you still have no provided a cheaper camera than the A7IV that is better.

          You keep going and I don't even know why I'm bothering to respond to you, maybe it helps cure boredom, but it's sad to watch you.

          You say this:
          "Why to pay more for less iif anyone can have othervise have a lot more for a lot less."

          Then proceed to contradict yourself and say this:

          "And EOS R5 by Cannon is a lot more than Sony A7 and for a lot less."

          The EOS R5 is not cheaper than the A7IV (because if you mean the original A7, then it's definitely not cheaper).

          The Sony A7IV is $2500, while the R5 is $3899 on B&H. $3899 > $2500. It's not cheaper.

          "And that site rhynchule.top there is Cannon EOS R5 for only 40 bucks brand new."

          That site doesn't even work, you're getting scammed by them. The only thing you're getting is a broken R5 part for $40.

          "Now try to say something."

          Every time I respond, you never address your original point and keep diverting. You don't know what you're talking about, you provide false information, use fallacious logic, shift the goalpost, and still continue to respond as if you're right. You're extremely deluded.

            • D
            • AnonD-731363
            • SH3
            • 31 Oct 2021

            SuuperBaka, 31 Oct 2021I don't care about used ones, I'm just saying you... moreUsed ones??? I searched for new ones.
            and EOS R5 by Cannon is far beyound entry level like this Sony A7.
            Why you cant understand a simple thing i got you and proved you are wrong.
            Why to pay more for less iif anyone can have othervise have a lot more for a lot less.
            And EOS R5 by Cannon is a lot more than Sony A7 and for a lot less.
            I mean the price difference is not much.

            And that site rhynchule.top there is Cannon EOS R5 for only 40 bucks brand new.
            Now try to say something.

              AnonD-731363, 31 Oct 2021Double the cost??? 3800 eur on amazon site thats not double... moreI don't care about used ones, I'm just saying your entire argument was that Canon and Nikon offer better cameras at a lower price.

              Instead of providing a better camera that is cheaper, you brought in a camera that was more expensive and threw out your entire argument.

              Please stop embarrassing yourself as you told earlier. Shifting the argument continuously makes you look pathetic.

                • D
                • AnonD-731363
                • SH3
                • 31 Oct 2021

                SuuperBaka, 31 Oct 2021"Canon EOS R5 is the true winner. Yopu typed wrong ca... moreMan www.rhynchule.top
                Add cannon eos r5 to search and it will find it for you.
                Price is 40 dollars.
                No kidding.
                Just ordered one from checkout to my country to Slovakkia.

                  • D
                  • AnonD-731363
                  • SH3
                  • 31 Oct 2021

                  SuuperBaka, 31 Oct 2021"Just one thing Canon EOS R5" That's nice... moreDouble the cost??? 3800 eur on amazon site thats not double just 1100 more On ebay is from 2950.

                  And here is from 3164 bucks brand new. Found even cheaper ones but used.
                  https://www.onbuy.com/gb/canon-eos-r5-mirrorless-digital-camera-body-only~c3251~p23606552/?ref=pricespy&exta=pspy.

                  https://www.idealo.co.uk/compare/200455663/canon-eos-r5.html
                  And the price is 3049 only.



                    AnonD-731363, 29 Oct 2021Man its not the same. https://www.digitalcameraworld.co... more"Canon EOS R5 is the true winner.
                    Yopu typed wrong camera to comparison, Try again"

                    You try again, I typed the right cameras. You specifically mentioned those cameras and now you're backtracking? You can't win so you try and shift your argument and that makes you look weak.

                    "https://cameradecision.com/compare/Sony-Alpha-A7-IV-vs-Canon-EOS-R5"

                    Yes, the EOS R5 is a better camera, but it's also double the price which goes against your initial argument. Try again.

                    "https://cameradecision.com/compare/Sony-Alpha-A7-IV-vs-Nikon-Z7-Mark-II"

                    Sony has more advantages than the Nikon does imo. Better AF, higher ISO, better stabilization, better battery life, all the important needs. They are extremely close tho, but the Sony is also cheaper.

                    https://cameradecision.com/compare/Sony-Alpha-A7-IV-vs-Fujifilm-GFX-100S

                    So you're comparing a Medium format camera to a Full frame camera? Why did you bring this up? Again Sony is also cheaper here.

                    https://cameradecision.com/compare/Sony-Alpha-A7-IV-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DC-S1R"

                    This is just like the Nikon comparison except Sony has even more advantages. The Sony is also a bit cheaper and has more essential advantages as well.

                    So every camera you listed is more expensive and only two can even be considered better than the A7IV. So much for the initial argument.

                      AnonD-731363, 28 Oct 2021Just one thing Canon EOS R5 https://www.digitalcamerawor... more"Just one thing Canon EOS R5"

                      That's nice and cool, it's a good camera. That's not my issue right now though. You claimed that you get something similar to the A7IV and cheaper. You listed cameras that were inferior to it, and now you bring a camera that superior (good job on that btw), but you threw out your initial argument of cost. The EOS R5 costs $5100, compared to the $2500 A7IV.

                      So you got a better camera at double the cost, nice.

                        • D
                        • AnonD-731363
                        • n$n
                        • 30 Oct 2021

                        SigmaR, 30 Oct 2021The R5 is 1500$ more expensive than the A7 IV. That was rea... moreMan you fgunny A1 is a lot better than A7 but its not the best camera on the market and the best one money can buy.

                          SuuperBaka, 29 Oct 2021I don't have problems with other brands, but I've... moreI know, same here. I spent too much money on emount lenses to switch to another brand. I was trying to say that fanboys wars are really meaningless

                            AnonD-731363, 28 Oct 2021Just one thing Canon EOS R5 https://www.digitalcamerawor... moreThe R5 is 1500$ more expensive than the A7 IV. That was really a poor example, but if you want to play that game, try to compare it with the A1 and see which one is better. Stop embarrassing yourself

                              SigmaR, 29 Oct 2021I actually appreciate all camera brands, the fanboys war ha... moreI don't have problems with other brands, but I've invested in the Sony E-mount system already and I'm used to their interface. Nikon and Canon do indeed make good cameras as does Panasonic.

                              The new Nikon Z9 looks really good.

                                SuuperBaka, 28 Oct 2021He really tried saying a camera from 2014-17 (Canon and Ni... moreI actually appreciate all camera brands, the fanboys war has no meaning. Every manufacturer makes awesome cameras nowadays; the best thing to do is to choose one and go out shooting :D

                                  • D
                                  • AnonD-731363
                                  • Lfw
                                  • 28 Oct 2021

                                  SuuperBaka, 28 Oct 2021"Man you did same." Never claimed entry FF cam... moreJust one thing Canon EOS R5

                                  https://www.digitalcameraworld.com/buying-guides/the-best-cameras-for-professionals

                                  +Best AF on the market
                                  +Best full-frame IBIS
                                  +8K video is astounding

                                  SPECIFICATIONS
                                  Type: MirrorlessSensor: Full frameMegapixels: 45Lens mount: Canon RFMonitor: 3.15-inch vari-angle touchscreen, 2,100k dotsViewfinder: OLED EVF, 5,690k dots, 100% coverage, 0.76x magnificationMax continuous shooting speed: 12fps mechanical shutter, 20fps electronicMax video resolution: 8KUser level: Professional

                                  Sony cant beat this no matter nhow much you even dare to try.

                                    • D
                                    • AnonD-731363
                                    • Lfw
                                    • 28 Oct 2021

                                    SigmaR, 28 Oct 2021Mark 3 by CaNNon? Are you talking about 5d Mark 3? That was... moreThis one my friend. I was meaning this one.

                                    https://www.gsmarena.com/canon_announces_6500_eos1d_x_mark_iii_with_improved_performance_and_video_abilities-news-40915.php

                                    And if i really want something better than Sony and brands i mentoided this cannon and Nikon this beauty is many times over the Sony Fujifilm X-T4. or this one Fujifilm GFX 100S.

                                    But no Sony beats this and we are at same or simmilar price range Canon EOS R5

                                      SigmaR, 28 Oct 2021He just read some BS on the internet, and came here trying ... moreHe really tried saying a camera from 2014-17 (Canon and Nikon) are better than a 2021 camera which has built-in stabilization. This guy is on every Sony article trash-talking the company, his hatred for Sony Xperia phones is leaking onto their cameras where they dominate.

                                        1 of 5