Motorola Frontier and its 194MP camera leak in new renders

18 February 2022
Previous rumors suggested a 200MP Samsung ISOCELL HP1 main sensor.

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • jKZ
  • 18 Feb 2022

Jacktackle, 18 Feb 2022There are only 2% of Android users who like flat screen res... moreYou tell him to keep his opinion to himself, but it's ok to share your opinion? Yeah, ok, hypocrite.

    • P
    • P C M
    • Mka
    • 18 Feb 2022

    SuuperBaka, 18 Feb 2022Oh boy....At 0.48 micron the sensor should be around 1/1.35-1.4" ... So. 1/1.5" is just a wrong info.

      Anonymous, 18 Feb 2022Samsung Semicon's goal is pixel of 0,48 micron. Oh boy....

        would love to see motorola bump themseves up in the market. its actually surprising what you get in the phones in the midrange price.

          • x
          • xefox
          • 3Dm
          • 18 Feb 2022

          Moto image processing is bad so who cares about MP and sensor.
          4500mah is low for a hot running 8gen1 chip that burns battery.

          Next!

            Let's hope this device will be a proof that even in 2022 megapixel count doesn't mean as much. But maybe I'm wrong and it'll be spectacular, though I doubt it.

              SA466, 18 Feb 2022Was excited for this since I tjought this would use Samsung... moreTrue, but this phone probably won't come with high end flagship prices. Probably similar in price to something like the regular Xiaomi 12 or Realme gt2 pro but with slightly better hardware specifications. More like an entry level flagship. I think they know not many people will choose them if they go the very high end route so they are focusing on offering the cheapest flagships at present

                Until Motorola doesn't come up with a consistent robust update policy its phones will fail to compete in the flagship market.

                  Already sd 8 gen 1 is a toaster and now OVERCLOCKED plus version...moto 30 pro was horrible with 8gen1

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • 34r
                    • 18 Feb 2022

                    [deleted post]The Nokia 808 had 40MP in 2012. It is easy to do a 194MP 1.5 sensor with 2022 industrial process of semiconductors. It is not so easy to have a good image quality. The problem will surely be a very mediocre ilage processing with a lot of ilage sharpening, halos everywhere and bad colors/HDR. Samsung proved it many many times.

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • JT5
                      • 18 Feb 2022

                      Anonymossy, 18 Feb 2022The funny thing is that they probably are using Samsung... moreThe 200MP HP1 is same size of GN2.
                      This one has size of GN5.

                        • ?
                        • Anonymous
                        • fCC
                        • 18 Feb 2022

                        Anonymossy, 18 Feb 2022Haha, nice joke. Unless you're not joking, in which... moreI was dead serious. It has to be 200 MP because 194 is just so 2022. Ew. who even clicks pictures on a 192mp

                          • J
                          • Jacktackle
                          • SpK
                          • 18 Feb 2022

                          DMX, 18 Feb 20224,500 battery and curved screen? will be born dead!!There are only 2% of Android users who like flat screen rest of them hate the flat screen. So keep your opinion to yourself

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • tDP
                            • 18 Feb 2022

                            i think this will be omnivision 0.61um 200mp camera , so i wonder why don't make 1.4um 50mp camera ?

                            when it goes to binned 50mp mode to capture image or 8k video it will have better sensitivity than standard 50mp 1.4um camera from the omnivision press release, also it can do 4K HDR with 3‑exposure staggered HDR timing

                              • S
                              • SA466
                              • p1I
                              • 18 Feb 2022

                              Was excited for this since I tjought this would use Samsung Isocell HP1, but 1/1.5" sensor size isn't really somethung to brag about in a flagship.

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • M30
                                • 18 Feb 2022

                                Anonymous, 18 Feb 2022No 200 MP cam = no buy oh no without you buying it motorola’s going to go bankrupt

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • JT5
                                  • 18 Feb 2022

                                  [deleted post]Samsung Semicon's goal is pixel of 0,48 micron.

                                    • X
                                    • Xperia
                                    • Dk%
                                    • 18 Feb 2022

                                    NEO, 18 Feb 2022NICE DESIGN, but please, ditch that logo of yours. That M l... moreomg you are so correct.
                                    Something about that Moto logo makes their phones look cheap.

                                      NEO, 18 Feb 2022NICE DESIGN, but please, ditch that logo of yours. That M l... moreI doubt that Motorola would simply just entirely ditch an iconic logo that they've been using for almost 67 years now. Yes, it is that old.

                                      They could probably do refinements to the logo though, like Samsung did back in 2005 going from their 1993 logo, or like what Xiaomi recently did. But I doubt they will.

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • mZw
                                        • 18 Feb 2022

                                        Front is Samsung, back is Xiaomi.
                                        Of course will be there no SD and No 3.5mm
                                        Giant black hole on the screen...
                                        Aannddd...
                                        Certainly will be sky high expensive.

                                          3 of 5