Samsung Galaxy A54 5G and F04s spotted on Geekbench
- ?
- Anonymous
- fjR
- 10 Dec 2022
Still not as powerful as SD 778G from two years ago. Quite embarrassing that the A52s is still going to be better than the A54.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7jZ
- 10 Dec 2022
Mali g68? Which gonna be 3 years old
- ?
- Anonymous
- 8ta
- 10 Dec 2022
Okay, one last chance Samsung...
A74! Don't screw it up with your crappy chip! Otherwise I'm gonna have to...
Pray that there will a new FE this year 😏
- A
- A.C
- tsA
- 10 Dec 2022
Anonymous, 10 Dec 2022Weaker than 778 I suppose. It's comparable, actually. The single core is on par, the multi core is like ~100-ish lower.
- ?
- Anonymous
- a4$
- 10 Dec 2022
So Exynos 1380 is 4x 2.4 and 4x 2.0. Finally catch up on A52S 's 778.
- T
- The Android Freak
- 7k9
- 10 Dec 2022
Anders, 10 Dec 2022Yes. Phones only get worse now. The A5x series peaked with ... moreSnapdragon 782G was available. But Samsung is testing their chips prowess to test in mid range and will launch competitive chipset in 2026 for S series. Samsung needs to succeed in order to keep check on Qualcomm prices. With snapdragon 8 gen 2, difference between Dimensity chipset and snapdragon chipset is quiet large again after two years of hiatus due to Samsung foundry. With Kirin out of the way, Samsung success in this sector is even more important.
- HyperionBurn
- atf
- 10 Dec 2022
The s21 fe/s21/plus would be way better, even the s21fe is the same price new or the s20 fe new is much cheaper. Only problem is software support since they’re old phones
- ?
- Anonymous
- Ycm
- 10 Dec 2022
Anonymous, 10 Dec 2022Weaker than 778 I suppose. I think it's comparable, actually.
https://browser.geekbench.com/android_devices/samsung-galaxy-a52s-5g
712 - Single-Core Score
2635 - Multi-Core Score
Now, the question is if it is actually efficient...
- C
- Cripleson Tingle
- L1q
- 10 Dec 2022
Samsung back at it again with mediocre mid-range phones for 2023.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7Xc
- 10 Dec 2022
Crappynos with no charger inbox, no 3.5mm jack, no sdcard? DoA!
- H
- Hanif Fikri
- ib4
- 10 Dec 2022
Galaxy F04s lol. the old galaxy a20 is better scored at 240 single core...helio p35 should not be used by 2022..it should be at least helio p65
- ?
- Anonymous
- YUU
- 10 Dec 2022
Screen size is nice but the SoC ...... 🙄🤦🏻♂️
Well, if this true, A54 will be out of my list.
- D
- AnonD-731363
- Lfw
- 10 Dec 2022
A50 was great device but A51 were a lot better, Then A52 and A52s came to the light of the world which has been best from A5X series.
A53 and this A54 looks way worse than A51 was.
But yes samsung loves to ask 500 euros for a lot worse device than A52s was which now can be bought for maybe 250 or 300.
- ?
- Anonymous
- MSJ
- 10 Dec 2022
Anders, 10 Dec 2022Yes. Phones only get worse now. The A5x series peaked with ... moreHowever you skipped A53 in such comparison. That one was a downgrade. Now, compared to A53, it will be an upgrade. (while 6.4" not really worse than 6.5")
- ?
- Anonymous
- Kg@
- 10 Dec 2022
Anders, 10 Dec 2022Yes. Phones only get worse now. The A5x series peaked with ... moreProbably to force us A52s users to "upgrade" to their vanilla flagship which is S23 with triple the price and use almost midrange specs that starts at 128GB option, no thanks.
- A
- Anders
- 39y
- 10 Dec 2022
Anonymous, 10 Dec 2022Weaker than 778 I suppose. Yes. Phones only get worse now. The A5x series peaked with the A52S. I expect downgraded cameras and the removal of micro SD support too