Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra specs sheet leaks in full
- N
- Narazumono
- 3bm
- 01 Feb 2023
Note9 User, 01 Feb 2023I'm certain that S24 also comes with Snapdragon, but p... moreThere are no trade deals in my country unfortunately
Idk when they plan on bringing Exynos back but i'm definitely gonna be upgrading before it comes back
This is the first and will be the last time i'm buying Exynos unless they make it better than Snapdragon
- N
- Note9 User
- nE5
- 01 Feb 2023
Anonymous, 18 Jan 2023How is this 200mp compare to imx989?"How is this 200mp compare to imx989?"
Now that is the question on my mind (& probably many others).
- N
- Note9 User
- nE5
- 01 Feb 2023
Narazumono, 18 Jan 2023The people who bought one of the S22 phones with Exynos are... moreI'm certain that S24 also comes with Snapdragon, but probably not S25.
However you could look on Samsung for trade in deal as an option.
- A
- Anonymous
- X@W
- 25 Jan 2023
vijay krishnan, 24 Jan 202345W charger. Wow. Even my tertiary phone has 65W charging.The more faster charger welcome the more damage to battery health
- N
- Nick Tegrataker
- Xpf
- 24 Jan 2023
Anonymous, 23 Jan 2023In reasonable conditions it will, but not more than the res... moreWhy did you think pointing out a grammatical mistake was necessary when the discussion is all about how lens and sensor resolutions work? That's completely irrelevant.
- N
- Nick Tegrataker
- Xpf
- 24 Jan 2023
Nick Tegrataker, 24 Jan 2023Great point. I just looked into the samples from GSMArena a... moreActually, after posting this comment, I looked into how Mate X2 stacks up with its own 50MP mode against Mi 11's 108MP mode - The level of resolved detail is indistinguishable between the two, looking at the balcony pattern. It says a lot about the level of detail that can be captured by a smartphone lens.
- F
- FlagshipsSuck
- mr{
- 24 Jan 2023
ga, 18 Jan 2023can you specifiy models please?Vivo X90 Pro+
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Huawei P50 Pro
All of these phones are way better than this Scamdung.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0dp
- 24 Jan 2023
same thing as s22 ultra
- S
- SirArtur
- mMd
- 24 Jan 2023
Anonymous, 23 Jan 2023In reasonable conditions it will, but not more than the res... moreJust to clarify, my statement was that digitally enlarging the resolution will give you exactly the same result, as putting more pixels into the sensor behind pure optic - nothing. The result will be exactly the same, with a very high number of pixels, with a not big effective resolution.
- S
- SirArtur
- mMd
- 24 Jan 2023
Anonymous, 23 Jan 2023In reasonable conditions it will, but not more than the res... moreI did not say that in any of my comments. Well, English is not my first, or even second language, so sorry for the mistakes. I don't use it that often.
I say, and it is not my opinion, but fact, same as the earth is round, etc., that you will not have any gain adding resolution to the sensor if the optic that is used with that sensor provides an image of much lower resolution! And it is not restricted by brand, or my imagination but by how light works. Nothing less, nothing more. Again, don't take my words for granted, just go to google, type "refraction limitation of lenses" and just read. Trust me, it does not hurt.
- N
- Nick Tegrataker
- Xpf
- 24 Jan 2023
Feanor12, 23 Jan 2023How about Xiaomi Mi Note 10 --► 108 MP (7P lens), f/1.7, 25... moreGreat point. I just looked into the samples from GSMArena again for both Mi 11 (Which has a sharper lens than Mi Note 10 from what I could gather) and iPhone 14 Pro, in 108MP and 48MP modes, respectively - They seem to resolve the very comparable amount of details, with the former having a very slight edge when it comes to resolving finer patterns (But clearly not to an extent suggested by the difference in sensor resolution).
- ?
- Anonymous
- t@S
- 23 Jan 2023
Nick Tegrataker, 23 Jan 2023GSMArena's Balcony shot easily tells you which cameras... moreA 64mp camera on Galaxy S21 edges out 50mp ones from iPhone and others according to the studio comparison chart, resolving more lines in ISO12233 too! But yeah, smartphone plastic lenses are def not sharp for 108mp, look at those blurry edges and reduced contrast in small textures on 108mp photos😂
Even if a lens is affected by diffraction, that does not mean the lens is diffraction limited. At first diffraction appears as low contrast in tiny details, then as it progresses, it will prevent two fine closely coupled lines from showing up as two distinct ones. At 64mp a lens shows a touch of softness but it is still resolving lines. At 108mp, on the other hand...😔
- Feanor12
- ni}
- 23 Jan 2023
Nick Tegrataker, 21 Jan 2023I haven't seen a single phone with a 108MP sensor that... moreHow about Xiaomi Mi Note 10 --► 108 MP (7P lens), f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm ?
I checked your link with calculator - lot of good info there, tnx for sharing! :)
- N
- Nick Tegrataker
- Xpf
- 23 Jan 2023
Anonymous , 22 Jan 2023Too bad physics favoured sensors can't do even with po... moreNo offence, but you're not making any sense.
- N
- Nick Tegrataker
- Xpf
- 23 Jan 2023
Anonymous , 22 Jan 2023Then you might not have seen too many samples. In reasonabl... moreGSMArena's Balcony shot easily tells you which cameras are capable of showing more details than others, and none of the photos from Nonacell 108MP sensors resolves the patterns better than those 48/50MP phones from Xiaomi, Oppo and Huawei flagships, or even iPhone (which is notorious for turning details into mush). Also on those 108MP cameras, details are a lot hazier when you zoom in 100%, lacking micro-contrast, suggesting that the lens is clearly not up to the task - which is further exacerbated by the remosaicing which introduces a bunch of detail/colour artifacts.
- A
- Anonymous
- XSs
- 23 Jan 2023
SirArtur, 23 Jan 2023In reasonable conditions it will, but not more than the res... moreIn reasonable conditions it will, but not more than the resultant resolution of the whole imaging system, which is lens and sensor! Sampling the same data will not make more data out of blue. It is not CSI Miami, where you can zoom in as much as you can and from two pixels you can see register plate of the car. If two neighbor pixels are carrying the same information, then it just does not matter. It is the same, as you digitally enlarging 50Mpix to 200Mpix with some algorithm. You will have theoretically greater resolution, but it will not make it more detail image. If that was true, then we would see in every telescope that is observing universe sensors with hundreds or thousands of Mpix resolution. But we do not. Why? Because packing them inside does not make any sense, as resolution of the image is not only the resolution of the sensor. Sure, 108Mpix will give you better results than lets say 12Mpix, but again, information of registered light on the picture, cannot be lower than limitation of the possible image registration for a given wavelenght of light! Sampling for such tiny details is possible if you have maaaany, maaaany pictures to sample, then you can detect changes in brightness of the pixel, and then interpolate it into data. But not when camera is taking one picture or stacking at most few. This is how e.g. LIGO detector works.
Just an entirely wrong conception of photo capturing with 17 grammatical mistakes. I stopped taking your comment seriously when you said the digitally enlarged resolution will be greater. Yeah in number. But comparing it with physical pixels is utter bs. Do some homework or let me favor you to teach something if insist.
- ?
- Anonymous
- SqW
- 23 Jan 2023
no sd card slut huh?
And SCAMoLED
no radio
no audio jack
Thanks but no thanks
SHOW ME NEXT PHONE PLEASE!
- S
- SirArtur
- mMd
- 23 Jan 2023
Anonymous , 22 Jan 2023Then you might not have seen too many samples. In reasonabl... moreIn reasonable conditions it will, but not more than the resultant resolution of the whole imaging system, which is lens and sensor! Sampling the same data will not make more data out of blue. It is not CSI Miami, where you can zoom in as much as you can and from two pixels you can see register plate of the car. If two neighbor pixels are carrying the same information, then it just does not matter. It is the same, as you digitally enlarging 50Mpix to 200Mpix with some algorithm. You will have theoretically greater resolution, but it will not make it more detail image. If that was true, then we would see in every telescope that is observing universe sensors with hundreds or thousands of Mpix resolution. But we do not. Why? Because packing them inside does not make any sense, as resolution of the image is not only the resolution of the sensor. Sure, 108Mpix will give you better results than lets say 12Mpix, but again, information of registered light on the picture, cannot be lower than limitation of the possible image registration for a given wavelenght of light! Sampling for such tiny details is possible if you have maaaany, maaaany pictures to sample, then you can detect changes in brightness of the pixel, and then interpolate it into data. But not when camera is taking one picture or stacking at most few. This is how e.g. LIGO detector works.
- A
- Anonymous
- XSs
- 22 Jan 2023
Nick Tegrataker, 21 Jan 2023I haven't seen a single phone with a 108MP sensor that... moreThen you might not have seen too many samples. In reasonable conditions, 108mp sensors will must take more detailed image. If you care about physics that's how physics works. More pixels will take more tiny details. You're confused between photo sharpness and details.