Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 spotted on GeekBench
- Z
- Zero
- EU0
- 18 Dec 2023
Kirisame, 18 Dec 2023Exactly equal to Dimensity 8000 (Max). I think GPU will be ... moreGPU MUST be superior in order to put Qualcomm more pression for them.
- Z
- Zero
- EU0
- 18 Dec 2023
Nein, 18 Dec 2023Not sure about the A55 losing popularity. I mean, the A54 h... moreFunny story the Poco has longer community support unlike Samsung one. There are way more times custom ROMs for Poco than for Samsung.
- N
- Nein
- 7XX
- 18 Dec 2023
Lets not even get to the fact that you’re comparing the Poco F lineup (which is POCO’s flagship lineup) to Samsung’s A. If this is ever gonna be fair, the Galaxy As should be compared with the Poco X lineup which is their middle midrange.
- N
- Nein
- 7XX
- 18 Dec 2023
jerem06, 18 Dec 2023The Poco F6 is coming soon with a better photo sensor, the ... moreNot sure about the A55 losing popularity. I mean, the A54 has a worser chipset but it managed to appear high in both the top 10 by daily interest and fans but the Poco F5 didn’t even get to the tenth spot.
- ?
- Anonymous
- vaS
- 18 Dec 2023
Cpt.Power, 18 Dec 2023Man no matter how you look at F5 poco is still better. Sa... moreWater strip indicator got triggered on friend's Samsung phone and Samsung did not honor warranty. Didn't take a dive or submerged it. Guess the correct environmental conditions did it. Then Samsung said don't get said phone near the water again. Maybe because it was an older model since Samsung fanboys today keep saying the company can reseal the ip68 of their phones.
- j
- jerem06
- 3g5
- 18 Dec 2023
justasmile, 18 Dec 2023Bla bla bla And what about the far worse camera Poco F5 ... moreThe Poco F6 is coming soon with a better photo sensor, the Galaxy A55 will not be of much interest
- justasmile
- vjq
- 18 Dec 2023
Cpt.Power, 18 Dec 2023Man no matter how you look at F5 poco is still better.
Sa... moreBla bla bla
And what about the far worse camera Poco F5 has? You get some and lose some anyway. And while One UI is bloated, MIUI is far worse including more bugs.
- I Just Read
- BiP
- 18 Dec 2023
ikhiiofl.stan, 17 Dec 2023Sooo.. does that mean that the E1480's faster than the... moreRevegnus knows ABSOLUTELY nothing his 100% fabrication (leaks) disintegrate one question later
As already stated GB 6 score for a phone 3 months away using a chip not yet released
Spoiler alert Exynos 2100 not Exynos 1480!! but hey wouldn't it be the height of embarrassment if the Exynos 1480 were released AFTER the A55 were launched. (That
was a joke btw as in A55 not ready, Exynos 1480 specs if true offer minimalisticl improvement)
On this so called leaked, GB6 scores DON'T have to be published, additionally you would actually know the person who leaked, he just ran the test. There will be another 3 month of nothing information posted by this uninformed fabricator
(Does he just wake up and discover another leaked story?)
https://www.geekbench.com/editions/
"Offline Results
Save your results locally and prevent your results from appearing on the Geekbench Browser"
On 03/12/12 I posted this on article Samsung Galaxy A55's design revealed through leaked renders
https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_a55_design_cad_renders_surface-news-60799.php
This is a "reprint" of it's own earlier rumoured article
First leaked renders does not mean these are the actual personnel tasked with "official" project
Exynos 1480 and A55 are not linked, it's just a coincidence in time and a connection made.
The reasons I disagree is Real World and not happening in a vacuum
Briefly SoC price war is starting or has started, there are new dynamics in place. I have just read the long term review for the A54 which uses the Exynos 1380 this is a 5nm process true or not Samsung used its own to reduce cost
Both A54 and A53 are 5nm the A52s is 6nm
https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?&idPhone3=12074&idPhone1=10954&idPhone2=12070
It is more likely I alone (nobody else is typing this at my location nw}) think if Samsung opts for its own this will be the Exynos 2100, (S21 FE and S21 Ultra)
Just on the Fan Editions the S23 FE is the last, there is absolutely no other reason to place the camera flash positionally the same as the A range, previous FE flash placement was flagship. Rationalisation to Flagship and A range only
The A34 upgrade A35? would also go from 6nm to 5nm
Flagship Range
Then there is the A range, upgrades are not happening in isolation. E.g the A14 5G 5nm Exynos 1330 50+2+2 camera setup is also approaching upgrade. There is a delineation and Samsung would already have provisional spec assigned for the A56
A55 will use Exynos 2100, not 1480 and as not set in stone if there is a cut throat price war.
- justasmile
- vjq
- 18 Dec 2023
Anonymous, 18 Dec 2023not true. Poco F3 will not receive Android 14. confirmed by... moreOops, mb.
- rosesarerosie
- Le%
- 18 Dec 2023
Anonymous, 18 Dec 2023not true. Poco F3 will not receive Android 14. confirmed by... moreIt will recieve HyperOS tho
- ?
- Anonymous
- 3SA
- 18 Dec 2023
justasmile, 18 Dec 2023Software support is okay, 3 years of software updates and 4... morenot true. Poco F3 will not receive Android 14. confirmed by xiaomi.
- B
- Bebochekov
- p@P
- 18 Dec 2023
Phone Critic, 18 Dec 2023Perfect Gift for my Mom since she owns a A51 since 2017 tim... moreThe A51 came out in 2020, and my wife's A51 still works great.
- H
- Hemedans
- f0J
- 18 Dec 2023
Anonymous, 18 Dec 2023exynos 1xxx series never meant for mid range .More likely a... moreExynos 1xxx has many variants you just include all of them together, and this soc leaked score is 3500 in GB which is half of current flagship and most midrange don't throttle much real life performance difference will be even smaller,
- C
- Cpt.Power
- SH3
- 18 Dec 2023
Shadocx, 17 Dec 2023But it has MIUI, inferior build quality/IP rating, inferior... moreMan no matter how you look at F5 poco is still better.
Said inferior quality is only what you saying people who used that phone have complete opposite opinions.
And IPXX rating is nothing but an useless gimmick because even the lowest of the low redmi 7A can withstand few raindrops.
When company makes completely water proof phone then it will be something else.
Said water resistance which aint covered in warranty is nothing but a gimmick.
Cant understand people bragging for something as useless as IPXX rating. Such garbage feature since no company includes water or dust damage into the warranty.
And the said MIUI will be always less bloatware than Samsung UI. Just run the backround tests with performance.
Xiaomi with simmilar specs will always rpeform faster.
- C
- Cpt.Power
- SH3
- 18 Dec 2023
Reza.s, 17 Dec 2023If 1480 outperform dimensity 8100 or at least snapdragon 86... moreBro SD865 been released in 2019 is if Exynos 1480 can beat 4 years old CPU Samsung really did nothing exciting.
Its like you were saying that SD 4 gen 2 is faster than SD810.
- C
- Cpt.Power
- SH3
- 18 Dec 2023
Notably better. Well yes it runs Facebook, Whatsapp or TikTok by 0,0002 miliseconds faster.
Ad for that the initial price will be around 600 since A54 base release price were 550.
Still with the laughlable 25W charging no charger in box, no screen protector, no case, no earphones like Samsung phones of past times.
This company is going down honestly.
- justasmile
- vjq
- 18 Dec 2023
LoneOwl, 17 Dec 2023Poco F series existence is to provide the best SoC you can ... moreSoftware support is okay, 3 years of software updates and 4 years of security updates after all. Even Poco F3's receiving android 14!
- H
- Hugo
- fCI
- 18 Dec 2023
The exynos 1480 should be on a $300-$350 phone at best. For something like the A55 which is probably going to be between $500-$600, it should have atleast a snapdragon 7gen3 or exynos 2200.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 6c1
- 18 Dec 2023
Anonymous, 18 Dec 2023exynos 1xxx series never meant for mid range .More likely a... moreYou can go buy Samsung phone with flasghip chipset then (S or Z Series). Stop complaining.
Life is simple.
- N
- Nein
- 7XX
- 18 Dec 2023
Mills, 18 Dec 2023https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-compare/samsung-exynos-1380-v... moreAlthough other mid-range chipsets may have superior specs on paper, I have hope that Samsung is able to do what Apple did with its Silicon chips; software integration and optimization.