Sony Xperia Pro-C tipped to come with compact body and faster charging

21 May 2024
This is going to be an interesting one.

Sort by:

Anonymous, 21 May 2024It's highly unlikely that a phone under 6.3 inches wou... moreNot true, silicon batteries that are being used more and more can meet this slimness

    • O
    • Owly
    • RrK
    • 21 May 2024

    MrSTTEK, 21 May 2024lmfao the source of this tip is zackbucks, this make it eve... more...despite he says this rumor is fake..

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • 4BT
      • 21 May 2024

      3000 dollar

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • M5C
        • 21 May 2024

        20.

        For portrait field of view (e.g. not an unflattering angle for faces, such as 20mm) you're effectively getting photos at 3 to 6 MP. Take that to a photo lab. They'll probably recommend a max print size of 6x8 inches or even 5x7.

        If a manufacturer chooses 30mm, you can get print quality portraits up to 9x12 with a crop.

        Besides, the corner/edge detail is nearly meaningless with such a wide aperture, unless you're photographing the inside of a ball. You might call it bokeh or vignette or pretty lens barreling or whatever. I call it space I hardly ever use that detracts from a subject at my sweet spot of 40 to 80 mm.

        Unless I'm photographing the inside of a house being sold. Then, by all means, wide angle like 20mm...

        (Someone correct me if my physics is wrong. Please. I want to know why anyone would choose this FOV/lens.)

          If it's ExmorT 1" sensor, I'll toss cash at my screen

            • 4
            • 4point2cents
            • LiQ
            • 21 May 2024

            NOK6600, 21 May 2024gsma realize and aware a post regarding Sony Xperia new... moreYeah.
            And with everyone's focused mainly on "2k" resolution they have a bonus this time.
            Lol.

              2point4cents, 21 May 2024ever heard for preference? Have you ever heard of respecting other people's opinions?

                Anonymous, 21 May 2024"The leak doesn't mention an ultrawide camera&quo... moreThat's the front camera.

                  • 2
                  • 2point4cents
                  • LiQ
                  • 21 May 2024

                  [deleted post]ever heard for preference?

                    • n
                    • nope
                    • LiQ
                    • 21 May 2024

                    [deleted post]nothing to do with preference right? "small phones = small hands"
                    right?
                    according to you yes.. anyways... have a nice day! :)

                      Anonymous, 21 May 2024I think there was a huge misunderstanding with regards to t... moreWhat's even this? There are three cameras listed in the source. First is 1 inch 50mp one. 2nd is high speed sensor with 120fps recording. these both cameras are in the back.
                      The third 12mp 20mm camera is selfie camera.

                        DarlingYext, 21 May 2024Absolutely not. "2K resolution, also known as 1440p... moreThis is some random blog. Industry specification set by DCI term 1080p as 2k.
                        1440p is 2.5k.
                        How to find 2k if 4k resolution is given?
                        Divide the horizontal and vertical pixel count by 2.
                        4k = 4096*2160 or 3840*2160
                        2k = 2048*1080 or 1920*1080
                        Why 2k or 4k?
                        4k means 4000 and 2k means 2000. It denotes the approximate number of horizontal pixels which are 4096 or 3840 in the case of 4k and 2048 or 1920 in the case of 2k.

                          Anonymous, 21 May 2024It's highly unlikely that a phone under 6.3 inches wou... moreBruh take a look at Xperia 10 series 6.1inch with 5k mah under 8.5mm thickness
                          It's possible because of 21:9 ratio display design..

                            this is what the 1 series should've been. Instead of saying they make photography focused phones, they could've differentiated by saying they make photography focused small phones. No one else has a 1 incher on a compact phone, so there's actual value in a phone like this.

                            I just wonder, how much are they gonna charge for this? 2k euros? 1.8k perhaps? Anything above the 1 VI's price would be horrible unless this 1 inch sensor has continuous zoom till 3x or something, for something like that even 2.5k euros would be justified. Sony just charges high prices for dated tech. At least the Pro-C would be somewhat unique in that it has no direct competitor so yeah the pricing would make more sense than whatever the 1 VI is going for.

                              • T
                              • Timbeeeeer
                              • LiQ
                              • 21 May 2024

                              Anton .el PAPI., 21 May 2024Sony is officially dead! 6.0 "fast charge" 45w p... moreThis is news about possible compact phone from Xperia, so what did you expect?

                              A COMPACT with over 6.7" screen maybe?

                              Ay papiiiii Lmaoooo

                              Ah.. I just saw all your post comments. Oh well.. Nice chatting with you. Have a nice day!

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • 70d
                                • 21 May 2024

                                Anonymous, 21 May 2024No, a display with a resolution of 2340x1080 pixels and a 1... more"However, the horizontal resolution of 2340 pixels is still less than 2000 pixels, so it cannot be considered 2K."
                                If you try to make a joke, it's not funny.

                                  MrSTTEK, 21 May 2024another peak journalism: 1. a random "tipster" a... morelmfao the source of this tip is zackbucks, this make it even more unreliable

                                    MrSTTEK, 21 May 2024No 3840*2160 does not reach 4000 pixels at the longer side,... more"Almost" is enough
                                    I mentioned this in my other comment below:

                                    "FHD 16:9 --> 1920x1080 (almost 2K on width; also known as 2K; Cinema 2K 2048 × 1080)
                                    QHD 16:9--> 2560x1440 (2.5K on width; also known as 1440p; overall 4 times pixels on 720p)
                                    4K UHD 16:9 --> 3840x2160 (almost 4K on width and in Cinema 4K 4096 × 2160 )

                                    This is valid only for 16:9 aspect ratio screens. Nowadays smartphone displays have odd 20:9/19.5:9 screen sizes --> Though FHD+ and QHD+ might have the same 1080 and 1440 on height, they will have different width (reason why "+" is mentioned; no single name is agreed upon)

                                    Now coming back to arguments here; 2K means FHD+ and it should have almost 2K pixels on width with minimum 1920p. Once the height on width increased significantly depending on aspect ratio and reaches 2.5k on width and 1440p on height, it is no more 2K. Most of these resolutions are defined by the overall number of pixels present. You can't call 4000p width and 1p height a 4K because you only have overall 4k pixels on the screen where as true 4K will have almost or over 8,294,400 pixels."

                                      Smithravi, 21 May 2024 Red my previous comment. Most of these resolutions are def... moreNo 3840*2160 does not reach 4000 pixels at the longer side, you may want to use DCI 4K as a better example. The 3840*2160 4K UHD is more like a marketing term.

                                        • A
                                        • AndyS
                                        • 3GM
                                        • 21 May 2024

                                        Again top sensor and wrong algorithm))
                                        All other phones with this camera will much better)))

                                          6 of 8