Xiaomi 15 Pro specs leak, variable aperture is gone from the main camera

28 June 2024
If true, then it was a very short-lived experiment on Xiaomi's part.

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • 3gj
  • 23 Jul 2024

Id rather have the Pro released globally than the lame overpriced vanilla model.

    • g
    • gracious
    • X5u
    • 10 Jul 2024

    Has the version of 4x never been apdated. Or would be apdated soon. Just like Samsung tab

      Eno2, 28 Jun 2024Everywhere I read, the Sony LYT series have dual layer tran... moreAs you have mentioned only the LYT 800 is mentioned as having the dual layer tech. That is because the LYT T808 is the only one that has it. If every sensor in the LYT lineup had the double layer tech they would also mention it in their respective descriptions.

        Rkm, 28 Jun 2024Kinda disappointing. But if this means vanilla 15 will get... moreIf the Pro is not getting variable aperture then neither will the regular 15

          It also won't have a 1" sensor, the OV50K which is mentioned is a 1/1.3" sensor

            Eno2, 29 Jun 2024There is no proper review website that compared the data yo... morei'm talking about all the comparisons i've seen online aaaand the samples on sites like gsmarena. Also, Xiaomi and Oppo's philosophies are different. Oppo tends to have more dynamic range and less noise and Xiaomi tends to have a softer, more natural look with more noise and less dynamic range. Take a look at a Vivo photo, it'll have some outrageous dynamic range even on the X80 Pro, would you say that's the GNV? No.

              • E
              • Eno2
              • 0Ur
              • 29 Jun 2024

              jiyen235, 29 Jun 2024you're completely going off of the marketing talk. I&#... moreThere is no proper review website that compared the data you are referring to. We can read the marketing materials and try to do our own comparison.

              I've edited RAW files from Xiaomi 12 Ultra, which features the IMX 989 1" sensor, and there is indeed a both a big difference in DR and noise between it and the Oppo Find X7 Ultra.

              Xiaomi 12 Ultra JPG and RAW files: https://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/0485271854/xiaomi-12s-ultra/4857484902

              Oppo Find X7 Ultra JPG and RAW files:
              https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Cj1a1vf_ZIOe8u-EW82VIw2LDUjy4MMe

                • ?
                • Anonymous
                • LfV
                • 29 Jun 2024

                jiyen235, 29 Jun 2024you're completely going off of the marketing talk. I&#... moreAlso they made a mistake, it was a imx989 vs ov50h and not imx989 vs lyt-900 comparison in the links(light hinter 900 is the Name oft ov50h Variante in xiaomi 14).

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • IDd
                  • 29 Jun 2024

                  I need the 15 pro. I missed out on the 14 pro and had to get the s24+ after hearing that we won't get an international RoM. This is slightly less but still disheartening.

                    Eno2, 28 Jun 2024For starters, the main sensor LYT 900 compared to IMX 989, ... moreyou're completely going off of the marketing talk. I'm talking about actual real world differences from samples. I couldn't see much differences, if any, between the sensors themselves apart from the advancements Oppo made to their processing.

                      • R
                      • Redinaj
                      • 3Z5
                      • 29 Jun 2024

                      Hopefully they fix some camera software behaviour like portrait mode bumping exposure by 1 stop when a face is detected, HDR not really doing anything, over whitened ski tones.
                      Camera hardware was not really lacking.

                        • S
                        • Sports
                        • 3%s
                        • 28 Jun 2024

                        What happen this time ? Again camera lens is fogging like Xiaomi 14 ? ;) Overrated crap.

                          • E
                          • Eno2
                          • mAS
                          • 28 Jun 2024

                          jiyen235, 28 Jun 2024I know but I said "basically". The basics are the... moreFor starters, the main sensor LYT 900 compared to IMX 989, has 8x times the dynamic range, and 50% less noise, both of them having the same physical size (type 1").

                          Source:
                          https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eizLdWSn5qmiVogzNvxFEoR9d4mdv12B/view?usp=drive_link
                          https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_XFRtGnli8aYJWRKTpf9kI3K2wwxRYOG/view?usp=drive_link

                          The processing is also more advanced in the X7 Ultra, yielding really great results, comparable to dedicated cameras: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1PVMQcrcBenFHqANHPoczQmnanHAERRtX

                          Those are not small differences, but substantial ones. A small difference may be 10%-20%, 300% is a substantial one IMO.

                            Anonymous, 28 Jun 2024Typical Ch/nese upgrades or downgrades Every iteration is ... moreSamsung downgraded their 10x to a 5x, typical downgrade!111

                            If you had more than 1 braincell you wouldn't say stuff like this.

                              Eno2, 28 Jun 2024IMX882 is NOT the a LYTIA sensor! It has the older IMX abbr... moreI know but I said "basically". The basics are there but just some more advanced tech is there too. Besides LYTIA doesn't matter, tell me a difference between the Find X6 Pro and Find X7 Ultra which isn't just the company's evolution with their processing overall. It's all marketing speak.

                                Anonymous, 28 Jun 2024Typical Ch/nese upgrades or downgrades Every iteration is ... moreAh yes the Find X7 Ultra was such a downgrade from the Find X6 Pro, right?

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • vaS
                                  • 28 Jun 2024

                                  Maria, 28 Jun 2024Why does Xiaomi not sell a very competitive good phone like... moreIf you live in the US, Xiaomi doesn't like your telco subsidized model. Which really sucks and I am glad China managed to ruin that party outside US territory.
                                  That and they also got sanctioned like Huawei but only temporarily for allegedly spying.

                                    • E
                                    • Eno2
                                    • mAS
                                    • 28 Jun 2024

                                    Anonymous, 28 Jun 2024Again LYT500, 600, 700 , 808 and 900 DO NOT HAVDE dual... moreEverywhere I read, the Sony LYT series have dual layer transistors tech, which is the main innovation over the IMX series!

                                    "LYT800 1/1.43-type, 1/1.4” type premium model that rivals the high-quality 1” type sensor First sensor with 2-layer transistor pixel structure enabling excellent saturation signal level"

                                    Source:
                                    https://curioussteve.com/tech/explained/sony-lyt-explained/
                                    https://www.sony-semicon.com/en/technology/mobile/2-layer-pixel.html
                                    https://www.sony-semicon.com/en/info/2023/2023061501.html

                                    I'm open to discussion based on facts, if your information differs, please back it up with documentation and source links.

                                      Is the use of OmniVision a chinese patriotism thing or have their sensors actually improved enough to replace Sony sensors?

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • 0p}
                                        • 28 Jun 2024

                                        Maria, 28 Jun 2024Why does Xiaomi not sell a very competitive good phone like... moreAnd some of you will blame white house for that. 🤣🤣🤣