vivo X200 Pro, X200 Pro mini official with big batteries and Dimensity 9400
- D
- Darth Caesium
- H5x
- 14 Oct 2024
Anonymous, 14 Oct 2024Or even jn5What's the genuine advantage of JN5 over JN1 if all it has is better HDR and QPAF vs. DPAF?
- ?
- Anonymous
- LfV
- 14 Oct 2024
Darth Caesium, 14 Oct 2024It's still not using the JN1 as its selfie sensor thou... moreOr even jn5
- ?
- Anonymous
- nwW
- 14 Oct 2024
6000 mah for the Pro? Man I was expecting 6200-6500 mah. This sucks. I want a phone with 15h SOT not 12h.
- A
- Amit05
- yRw
- 14 Oct 2024
These are really good phones. The mini is absolutely spot on with a battery that most huge phones don't offer. The pricing is sweet.
- D
- Djellal
- rps
- 14 Oct 2024
Darth Caesium, 14 Oct 2024Source?
"Trust me bro"The trust me bro in question:
https://weibo.com/ttarticle/x/m/show/id/2310475089483157799211?_wb_client_=1
People here are lame for no reason it's crazy, it's just phones guys chill out
- D
- Darth Caesium
- H5x
- 14 Oct 2024
Anonymous, 14 Oct 2024Did I hear front cam with autofocus?It's still not using the JN1 as its selfie sensor though. A 32MP selfie camera does not have a good enough resolution for a flagship like this, and using it in a 32MP is nonsensical. Why can't Vivo just use the JN1, especially when their mid-range V40 series already uses it? And then, for the X200 Ultra, go a step further and use the IMX858.
- D
- Darth Caesium
- H5x
- 14 Oct 2024
Anonymous, 14 Oct 2024"It's technically a step down from the 1-inch cam... moreWhat would a 1/1.28"-type Exmor T equal to then? And what about a 1/1.12"-type Exmor T?
- D
- Darth Caesium
- H5x
- 14 Oct 2024
Djellal, 14 Oct 2024It literally is more efficient than imx989 22nm vs 40nm, so... moreSource?
"Trust me bro"
- D
- Djellal
- rps
- 14 Oct 2024
Anonymous, 14 Oct 2024LYT900 is 22nm too. Don't forget. With same DCG HDR
... moreSpreading lies ? Bro go read DCS review, there's samples vs x7u and x14u, why would i lie about that lol
Other part of my statement is just facts/specs
And you what the LYT-900 has the imx989 doesn't thus the new sensor is still widely regarded as an upgrade.
Also it's funny to compare Samsung policy to vivo while the vivo mini can already outclass s24u camera wise.
If vivo really wanted to largen the gap they wouldn't have given it the 200mp zoom lens.vivo even said there's some hardware improvement in the tele lens compared to the ultra
Also now it's still not worth it to spend more for the ultra lol, especially that the x200p is literally a better phone, better soc battery design and more modern display .
Comparing vivo to Samsung and apple is madness
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 14 Oct 2024
Vasra, 14 Oct 2024Still only 3 years of OS updates?Maybe in China people that buy expensive phones get new one every 12-24 months, just like the readers here that demand 7 years of update, but after 12 months use trade-in at carrier to get latest phone
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 14 Oct 2024
Anonymous, 14 Oct 2024It's a combination of the bigger aperture and lower no... moreImx989/ Lyt900 + f1.8 = FF + f4.87
Imx818 + f1.6 = FF + f5.55
Narrower lens + lower light sensitivity = more " A.I enhancement" to damage the jpeg files
✌🏻👍🏻
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 14 Oct 2024
Djellal, 14 Oct 2024It literally is more efficient than imx989 22nm vs 40nm, so... moreLYT900 is 22nm too. Don't forget. With same DCG HDR
Stop spreading lies. First , it is not physical capable of. It does not have dual layer tech nor WRGB CFA to increase light intake. It this was possible, then vivo would not wasting money to again have 1" inside ultra but would use this one to save money and inner space.
Samples posted here are proof it can't match x100 ultra. Corners have very mushed textures ( trees on right portion).
If it still had 1", difference between Pro and Ultra would be too small.
Basically screen res and SoC. Not enough to go for Ultra at extra price.
Vivo is just doing what other do. Larger gap between devices of premium segment.
Same reason samsung S+ does not get isocell HP series nor periscope ( not even a 90mm for example). To keep it way below Ultra
- ?
- Anonymous
- RYg
- 14 Oct 2024
Anonymous, 14 Oct 2024"It's technically a step down from the 1-inch cam... moreIt's a combination of the bigger aperture and lower noise that lets it shoot at a higher ISO than the old sensor that makes up for the difference in size. It might not be perfectly equal but it should come close.
Heat and power draw should be much lower so that's why video is much better.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LfV
- 14 Oct 2024
mrleft, 14 Oct 2024LMAO a 71.6mm wide device isn't mini. It's not ev... moreExcept pixel 9/9 pro are 72 mm wide and iphone 16/16 pro are 71,5 mm wide
- ?
- Anonymous
- Sk2
- 14 Oct 2024
DarlingYext, 14 Oct 2024Insane camera specs for such a small device!Will it beat on picture and video quality to something like Canon IXUS 285 HS
It's just a random compact digital camera for 300 euro
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 14 Oct 2024
BMHater12, 14 Oct 2024Besides the greedy stuff, you could blame taxes for thatWeird the fact stuff from Japan and South Korea do not double price in Europe.
- m
- mrleft
- 64i
- 14 Oct 2024
LMAO a 71.6mm wide device isn't mini. It's not even compact. It's larger than an S24, Pixel/Pixel Pro, and iPhone 16/16 Pro. Words have meanings.
- ?
- Anonymous
- RYg
- 14 Oct 2024
Wow, the mini has the same cameras as the full size version, flat screen and only 5% smaller battery? That's amazing. I'd totally choose the mini over the regular version, but I'm just not in the basket for a phone this year. Hopefully vivo continues this pattern in the future though!