Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro to set screen refresh rate record for global phones
- j
- jiyen235
- XQQ
- 01 Nov 2024
185 Hz 1080p. NOT worth it at all. Should've gone for 240 hz to properly differentiate.
This has a time between frames of 5.4 ms, whereas a 144 hz screen has a time between frames of 6.94 ms and a 120 hz screen has a time between frames of 8.33 ms.
Considering all of this, I'd say the IQOO 13 with it's 2K screen and still a superb 144 hz refresh rate is a better pick. You can upscale stuff too afaik so it's just gonna be a better experience overall. Asus will have better battery cus of the 1080p screen so there's that but for me this is just a no-go. Not fast enough to be better than a 2K 144 hz screen.
- ?
- Anonymous
- KZK
- 01 Nov 2024
sorry asus with that horrible notch you went backward
- I
- IpsDisplay
- 4ra
- 01 Nov 2024
justasmile, 01 Nov 2024Do they not know the Sharp Aquos Zero 2 exists?You beat me to it
Recency bias it seems
Sharp is still the best display maker by a mile and I will argue till death for this
They were doing 1hz refresh YEEEEEARS before it was mainstream from the likes of Samsung
Their IGZO OLED is still king most of these high brightness marketing pieces a plagued with green line issues
Don't get me wrong the panels from Samsung and BOE are not bad but not in the league of sharps stuff
- ?
- Anonymous
- KZK
- 01 Nov 2024
gaming phone with atupid notch stupid
- S
- SKG
- GR$
- 01 Nov 2024
Asus be like we will give the best hardware but you will get only 2 android upgrade and there will no service centre in case your device breaks.
- MakeMotoBetterAgain
- B47
- 01 Nov 2024
justasmile, 01 Nov 2024Do they not know the Sharp Aquos Zero 2 exists?sharp used to make really good hardware back then, they didn't have a chance when they joined in, sad that they fail outside the Japan
