Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek 9400 benchmark showdown
- r
- rRadD
- XS8
- 7 hours ago
Dimensity for the win. GSMArena, don't be sad. LOL
Seriously speaking, I hope MediaTek will not follow Snapdragon's pricing structure.
- C
- CompactLover
- bxd
- 7 hours ago
finally dimensity is where qualcomm has to put more effort. i have faith when they started with helio series, they will pave a better path. now with them lower in price, i can see more options coming from a lot of brands.
hopefully they can take the next step, making the instruction developer friendly. thats how qualcomm wins a lot of modders in their early days
- I
- IpsDisplay
- q98
- 7 hours ago
Anonymous, 7 hours ago"Mediatek is catching up"...
No Mediatek is exac... moreI am going to assume your parents sent you to maths class
This is the equation of your bias :
"No Mediatek is exactly the same percentage behind as every year.. about 10%"
Meanwhile in the same article
"In the GPU-heavy 3DMark benchmarks, the Dimensity 9400 edges out the SD8 Elite by 7-8%"
- e
- every upgrade cpu
- K18
- 7 hours ago
apple A18 not about because apple A18 of king
- ?
- Anonymous
- 3FE
- 7 hours ago
A18 Better
- G
- Gusta
- XTk
- 7 hours ago
If Mediatek price is cheaper, of course D9400 is the winner. Running super ultra speed like D9400 for smartphone is already ultra super fast :D
- u
- ua82
- 63x
- 7 hours ago
just comes down to power usage and temps also pricing then you see OP13 coming in cheaper then Oppo x8
- j
- jiyen235
- XQQ
- 7 hours ago
the performance is soo good now i don't think anyone would be "unhappy" or have FOMO about the other chip. One has better CPU the other has better GPU.
- L
- Lister
- n1b
- 7 hours ago
Both are good. I'd have either of these in my phone.
- Kangal
- HX6
- 7 hours ago
Pheelzy, 8 hours agoWow
Dimensity really tried this time Yep.
I am really impressed with their design. The 1+3+4 is how I would've also approached this. I actually expected MediaTek to get the win here for the total / multithread performance by maybe +10%, get roughly equal -5% on single-core, but then lose noticeably in the graphical performance by -25%.
So my expectations have really been flipped. That iGPU from Norway ARM Holdings is mighty impressive, beating the latest from Qualcomm, Apple, PowerVR, Intel, AMD, and Nvidia. Meanwhile, it looks like the folks from Nuvia were not bluffing about their processor. They have really high single-core performance, and a very high multithread performance from such few cores. It's a shame we couldn't get this technology back when ARM was floundering with X1/X2 architectures.
As always, let us wait for more data and testing. We need to evaluate their efficiency curves. And we need to see how well they are optimised on the driver level for the heavy-duty Apps, x86 translation, and high-level emulation. It doesn't make sense to pay so much for this technology and only use it for easy tasks like social media.
- ?
- Anonymous
- fCE
- 7 hours ago
I am interested in battery life and thermal efficiency
- ?
- Anonymous
- pXr
- 7 hours ago
"Mediatek is catching up"...
No Mediatek is exactly the same percentage behind as every year.. about 10%
- K
- Kekma
- nyf
- 7 hours ago
rizki1, 8 hours agountil Unisoc T999 will beat both of them.Nah man, Kirin will beat the sh*t out of them both
- o
- omzig
- CbK
- 8 hours ago
do we have TDP on both yet?