Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim model number pops up in certification
- I
- IpsDisplay
- q98
- 5 hours ago
If it was slim based on newer silicon carbon battery technology it would be cool
But we know Samsung they are going to make it slim
By only reducing battery capacity and cutting down specs and tech charging $200 extra
- D
- Darth Caesium
- dUQ
- 6 hours ago
Anonymous, 6 hours agoIf you hate connectivity, then unibody metal is indeed grea... moreIn which case, aramid fibres are great to use.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7@8
- 6 hours ago
Darth Caesium, 6 hours agoCarbon fibre backs, aramid fibre backs and unibody aluminiu... moreIf you hate connectivity, then unibody metal is indeed great. Everything in a modern smartphone has a radio of its own. Not saying glass is great, but it is there on all phones for a reason.
- D
- Darth Caesium
- dUQ
- 6 hours ago
Anonymous, 6 hours agoTbf those old moto droid razr ultra thing style phones were... moreCarbon fibre backs, aramid fibre backs and unibody aluminium designs are all much better suited to phones than glass, and much more premium too.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Fv1
- 6 hours ago
xPandamon, 8 hours agoIt doesn't have to suffer from either issue. A thinner... moreThe foldable phones are great examples of this. They go back to the single layer pcb design which is the thickest part of modern smartphones to make each half of the phone much thinner. This is likely just a z fold without hinge.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Fv1
- 6 hours ago
Darth Caesium, 7 hours agoLiterally who cares? Why would I want a slimmer phone? Wors... moreTbf those old moto droid razr ultra thing style phones were very cool in their day for the carbon fiber backs and stuff. The glass sandwich is what is holding back smartphone design.
- D
- Darth Caesium
- dUQ
- 7 hours ago
Literally who cares? Why would I want a slimmer phone? Worse battery life, worse performance (because less space for a vapour chamber and for heat to dissipate) and worse cameras are a terrible trade-off for a barely noticeable reduction in thickness and a noticeable if subtle reduction in weight. Plus, people will slap a case on this thing anyway, because it 100% will use a glass back, and phones this slim will provide worse grip. Brands did this a decade ago and stopped quite quickly because of all the compromises, and these are now worse in a day and age where we have camera bumps.
- ?
- Anonymous
- t7{
- 7 hours ago
Anonymous, 7 hours agoTo be called slim, should be at most 6mm. Something like ... more2hr battery life
- j
- jiyen235
- XQQ
- 7 hours ago
Imagine they use an Exynos for this yet have a higher price tag, that'd be great. Taking advantage of Samsung consumers is always great.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 7 hours ago
To be called slim, should be at most 6mm.
Something like 7.0 is pointless.
- x
- xPandamon
- JH0
- 8 hours ago
Zendroid, 8 hours agoSlim = low battery and high temperature. Gj. It doesn't have to suffer from either issue. A thinner device also has less space for the heat to travel through, so the heat transfers quicker to the screen, resulting in potentially better temps. Also this could use one of the new batteries, if it does, that is a good sign for the other S25U models, let alone for those to come
- p
- potato4k
- XZ8
- 8 hours ago
The lineup that really needs a slim version are the A5x and S FE series. The regular S series are slim and light enough already.
- Eyaddy
- fmj
- 8 hours ago
If it will perform just like the normal S25 then that will be a good move from Samsung although it might have worse throttle management then the normal S25