Nokia 2.3
- D
- Dexterdara
- r3H
- 08 Dec 2019
I got the phone for 89.8 EUR in Nigeria on December 7. However it was a 2GB ram and all other specs as above. I was using Samsung A5 2016. The camera is very clean and doesn't lag.
- A
- Aadrian
- S3$
- 08 Dec 2019
Jade, 08 Dec 2019The Nokia 3.2 released earlier this year, same price, and a... moreI would go for the 3.2 nevertheless, but even better is the 5.1 Plus. It can be purchased new for around 150 euro and the quality is superb. I got mine a year ago December 2018.
- ?
- Anonymous
- pX9
- 08 Dec 2019
Z, 07 Dec 2019We're living in 2019.. and letme tell you I've been using s... moredifferent companies have different financial plans and guidelines
asian phone makers have a very narrow profit margin and sell high(er) spec phones with very low prices
either you know this, then why do you call a low spec, high price phone from europe "dumb"? you know a brand has its lineup, right? they can't just dump the market with 8k SD855+ 8gb ram 108mpx phones costing less than 100$.
or maybe you don't know about it, then go read about marketing.
reviewing a product is helpful, yes. we may share a common problem that might help someone else choose better. but short comments about how idiotic or dumb this or that phone is, its not helpful at all.
- J
- Jade
- kka
- 08 Dec 2019
Aadrian, 07 Dec 2019In this price range there is only 1 phone globally availabl... moreThe Nokia 3.2 released earlier this year, same price, and actually comes with a fingerprint sensor and almost the same specs otherwise.
- ?
- Anonymous
- tEZ
- 08 Dec 2019
Kalapel, 06 Dec 2019Lol say mediakek p35 at least.. I want to say it too. But in this price nokia wouldn't give helio P35 at least.
- A
- Aadrian
- S3$
- 08 Dec 2019
Anonymous, 07 Dec 2019Hate to tell you Samsung A20 is that price! It's not available here, only A20s or A20e which are around 150 euro.
- A
- Aadrian
- S3$
- 08 Dec 2019
Anonymous, 07 Dec 2019The ZTE Blade A7 Prime for Visible Wireless does...for $99 ... moreIt's not globally available...
- ?
- Anonymous
- vMf
- 07 Dec 2019
Aadrian, 07 Dec 2019110 euro and you want super amoled? Hate to tell you Samsung A20 is that price!
- ?
- Anonymous
- vMf
- 07 Dec 2019
183 g (6.46 oz) 183 g (6.46 oz)183 g (6.46 oz)183 g (6.46 oz)183 g (6.46 oz)
- ?
- Anonymous
- KZK
- 07 Dec 2019
Hopefully there will be 3 GB RAM variant soon. Overall is good just disappointed with the 5W charging
- ?
- Anonymous
- ILE
- 07 Dec 2019
Aadrian, 07 Dec 2019In this price range there is only 1 phone globally availabl... moreThe ZTE Blade A7 Prime for Visible Wireless does...for $99 bucks or free with a swap, using now!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0wY
- 07 Dec 2019
A-GPS, Glonass and BDS but no Galileo tells it is for USA, Russia and China but not Europe.
- d
- davisrases
- YQW
- 07 Dec 2019
mms, 07 Dec 2019what the f***k is nokia doing whay cant they make super amo... moreAbsolutely! We also need in display fingerprint sensor, stereo speaker setup, triple camera, with 64mp main sensor, pop up selfie camera, mixer grinder, vacuum cleaner, 4 wheels!
- A
- Aadrian
- Sk@
- 07 Dec 2019
Khan, 06 Dec 2019No fingerprint what a jock??In this price range there is only 1 phone globally available that had been launched in 2019 with a fingerprint scanner, and it had a worse screen. The Alcatel 1v. So not a joke, just a common thing. If you want a fingerprint scanner spend 50 euro more.
- A
- Aadrian
- Sk@
- 07 Dec 2019
mms, 07 Dec 2019what the f***k is nokia doing whay cant they make super amo... more110 euro and you want super amoled?
- O
- OntheWinningSide
- r3a
- 07 Dec 2019
alireza1984e, 07 Dec 2019nokia gets worse and worse nokia 2.3 is a backward against ... moreThat's a lie!
- O
- OntheWinningSide
- r3a
- 07 Dec 2019
Darren, 06 Dec 2019I don't know why anyone would buy a Nokia phone,pants desig... moreNokia is my best brand. No other brand is quite like Nokia. I don't know why you hate what is good. Nokia 2.3 gives me just what I've been looking for.
- m
- mtrantalainen
- niL
- 07 Dec 2019
Nokia 2.3 is a lot bigger than Nokia 2.2 but does have zero additional pixels on the screen - is this designed for elder people?
In addition, Nokia 2.2 had replaceable battery whereas this one has fixed battery.
The only plus side for Nokia 2.3 seems to be the depth camera which might allow real portrait mode camera. Other than that, Nokia 2.2 seems to be a much better choice.
I was expecting Nokia 2.3 to be similarly sized to Nokia 2.2, with better camera and 4 GB of RAM. Maybe a bigger removable battery. Disappointed.
- Z
- Z
- YQP
- 07 Dec 2019
mohi, 07 Dec 2019Those of you who come and post hateful an inappropriate com... moreWe're living in 2019.. and letme tell you I've been using smartphones since nokia Launched 6600.. and as being a consumer of smartphone since 2004 I have right and experience to review a smartphone, As I think I have enough experience to review one.. And I bet I owned more smartphone than you for sure... even smartphone OEM ask for your opinion/review after using that phone... So what you just commented is just idiotic.. And what any user thinks is their opinion.. and you cannot change anyone's opinion no matter how much you try.. so pls stop posting idiotic comments