Nokia 3120 classic
- ?
- Anonymous
- MYk
- 29 Feb 2008
comparing it with SAGEM my750x is just comparing pig with chicken... doesnt make much sense
- M
- Max
- M@T
- 28 Feb 2008
The phone is not all that,its okay!Look at the SAGEM my750x for example that phone makes this a Nokia look lika a joke!The SAGEM is way better look it up guys!But yal will probably over look it as usual!Nokia and the BIG brands need to watch their backs cos the underdogs are coming strong.
- j
- jibai
- TST
- 27 Feb 2008
ok lah ,2.0megapixes wa order 10lah
- S
- Same Same
- ijv
- 26 Feb 2008
Strange. According to Nokia site, it has autofocus. Maybe a mistake ?
http://www.forum.nokia.com/devices/3120_classic
Resolution: 1600 x 1200
Sensor: CMOS 2.0 Megapixels
Feature: ***Auto Focus***, Flash, Self Timer
Video Resolution: 640 x 480
Video Frame Rate: 15 fps
Video Format: H.263, H.264/AVC
- ?
- Anonymous
- ijv
- 26 Feb 2008
I suppose this is the successor of 6233. Not bad, will sell very well no doubt !
- n
- nsgs
- upY
- 25 Feb 2008
It is a good phone if your budget is less than 150 Euros.Rupees 9000.It has a decent 2 Megapix camera and can shoot 640 x 480 resolution videos and card slot upto 4GB.GPRS(67kbps) and EDGE(296kbps) are class 32 and also 3G(384kbps) matching smartphones.Nice to buy.I will buy if it is priced between Rs.7000-8000.which will be its price by the end of this year.
- I
- Igor
- 0pA
- 22 Feb 2008
Of course it has a photocall function, they just didnt put it in the specification :-)
- L
- Lucy
- iBt
- 20 Feb 2008
I think i would get it if its cheap enough. Good phone though. Loved the violet one. Looks stylish XD
- w
- wonderer
- niF
- 18 Feb 2008
It seems that it does not have photocall?
Would'nt it be a self-evident fact??
Or maybe Nokia forgot it by mistake.
- T
- Tony
- pky
- 15 Feb 2008
It is more...Lady phone...
- ?
- Anonymous
- nQ}
- 15 Feb 2008
the published retail price before tax&subsidies is 150euros in Q2.
- M
- Mountain King.
- F4p
- 14 Feb 2008
Mm, i'll probably buy this phone for my mum...
- a
- adits74
- M@T
- 12 Feb 2008
This is not a low end phone, I hear from another forum that these phone is more expensive than 6233, so it is not lower phone at all
- f
- frank
- NHH
- 12 Feb 2008
THUMBS UP 4 NOKIA!Guys I believe this is a real update version of the 3120 which is a simple low-end fone.Nokia knows what it's doing. Any one needing a fone with complex features has alternative to go for the multitudes of the likes of N-series, E-series, the 60 whatevers. NOKIA HAS NO PROBLEM AT ALL! The choice is widely laid out for you guys!
- ?
- Anonymous
- M@T
- 12 Feb 2008
Hello!!! Expecting more from a low end phone??!!! Duhhh!!!! Isn't this model deserved to be praised?! Looks like a dream come true for the low end phones! I never expect that this would happen. A low end phone that has 3G and got a dual camera.
To the HATERS:
Why are you posting here if you don't like this phone in the first place?!! You are most probably SE fans that wanted to diss out Nokia. You are the real unfair ones!
- a
- alea
- wuj
- 12 Feb 2008
hi...
am so excited to this new model 3120 classic... it sounds good...
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0BT
- 11 Feb 2008
I'm not impress anout htis phone is so classic! and the features are simple too and NO added features added in this phone! this phone looks so vey old fashion! and what's the year today it's 2008 and Nokia have still created old classic phone! waste of time!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0BT
- 11 Feb 2008
ugly color and the design is still the same ok! it has an 3G, etc. but No added features!
- k
- kinetic
- F4p
- 10 Feb 2008
i wish they'd just make a 6233 with 2.5mm/3.5mm earphone port. keep everything else the same. Especially the dual side speakers..
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0V0
- 10 Feb 2008
oh
its like a brick....................................