Nokia 5250
MORE PICTURES

Nokia 5250

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • s
  • syah_reiza
  • PFx
  • 17 Aug 2010

.it worst than 5230 less gps with 2MEGAPIXELS and older OS,
i hope nokia can solving the problems,
for now, LG is a leader.
look at lg pop, the touchscreen with solar charger. be future guys. sucks4 5250.

    • k
    • kumar
    • v{t
    • 17 Aug 2010

    if they add 3G,itz better

      • M
      • Mark
      • wgX
      • 17 Aug 2010

      From a telco standpoint, the X6 is outselling most handsets to date. So far, in australia we have seen a phenominal uptake of the X6 (second only to the iphone when stock is available). Other countries have seen the uptake of the X6 in similar numbers, but more proportionate to other handsets. This model however does not boast any real credentials like the X6 and will likely be forgotten not long after release. Next model...

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • 3cb
        • 16 Aug 2010

        this is a color 1100 with touch :| no one wants to use this

          • ?
          • Anonymous
          • Kg$
          • 15 Aug 2010

          i think this phone is only for those who want a plain touchscreen phone... its like 3110 with a big touchscreen... better go for 5230... theres nothing interesting about this phone!! Nokia what are you doin'!

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • fsg
            • 14 Aug 2010

            Very good phone I think Nokia do right .

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • tWi
              • 13 Aug 2010

              /i don't think this is a successor to the 5230 but rather the 5233/5228. The 5230 will be sold along side of this and the 5530. Just more choices. The 5800 is still being sold despite the x6 or c6.

                • g
                • gurudev
                • vGg
                • 13 Aug 2010

                its all about worst for me
                i m looking for 3g handset with good looking at the range of INR 5K to 7K
                5250 seems good but the lack of 3g makes it worthless for me
                even the edge is not the high class
                it should be class 32

                  • m
                  • metom
                  • Kxb
                  • 12 Aug 2010

                  what is the Nokia want to tell us about??

                    • S
                    • Syl
                    • nDZ
                    • 12 Aug 2010

                    i agree. it cannot be 65k colours. Most probably 16 million colours. Besides that, if this is the succesor of 5230, where is the rationality in removing a part of 5230's specifications, like GPS per example? I would rather bet on a slightly better camera and possible wifi on it. Else i see no reason to have this as 5230 succesor as it has been spoken about.

                      • 2
                      • 2toyzki
                      • vx0
                      • 12 Aug 2010

                      IT IS NOT 65k color display! where on earth did you find a S60v5(SymbianOS9.4) handset with less than 16Million color?!.. maybe you're not using your common-sense this time..

                        • s
                        • stefanu12d
                        • 33G
                        • 12 Aug 2010

                        Anonymous, 11 Aug 2010Not a good phone to buy...... Is not a value for money phon... morewhat do you mean "not value for money phone"... it will probably be 100 euros... 5800 is more then twice that price... in 100 euros you have microsd, 2 MP, bluetooth, accelerometer and simbyan with tons of application and true multitasking... what more do you want?

                          • P
                          • Prakhar
                          • utv
                          • 11 Aug 2010

                          Not To buy if price goes over Rs.5000

                          At-least 3.2MP camera along with flash should be added to it, Radio along with proximity sensor should be added then this phone then it is buy able otherwise a useless phone...

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • PGj
                            • 11 Aug 2010

                            Not a good phone to buy...... Is not a value for money phone..... Nokia 5800 xpress music is much better than dis one.... no touch flow in dis phone with poor touch efficiency(because of resistive screen not capacitive)....... Don't buy dis phone at all.......

                              • c
                              • cmg
                              • nxZ
                              • 11 Aug 2010

                              a really nice phone, can't wait till it comes out! the camera should be better though...

                                • D
                                • Danz
                                • PRW
                                • 11 Aug 2010

                                Best phone.

                                  • A
                                  • ArchitB
                                  • 9AH
                                  • 11 Aug 2010

                                  Totally a useless touchscreen phone..