Nokia 6610i
MORE PICTURES

Nokia 6610i

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • 06 Apr 2004

CIF-Cam and a 4096 colors CSTN screen are not the technology standard. Nowadays we have VGA & Megapixel-Cams and active TFT-Displays with 65000 or around 262000 colors, Nokia.

    • 2
    • 2Berk
    • 06 Apr 2004

    like i said... it's USELESS.

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • 06 Apr 2004

      why didnt nokia bring this out first and where is the 65k or 256 k screen nokia get with the time and move on from 4096 colours

        • B
        • Bo
        • 05 Apr 2004

        I must say that I'm suprised because so many sites really believes this model to exist. But the truth... well, you will see... ;)

        Some hints: Series "45" (used in 7600, for example) 1.3Mp, flash, Q3... ;)

          • b
          • bor
          • 05 Apr 2004

          Nokia should be careful. It seems like they are losing it. The designers are dead. It´s time for better models. Don´t forget we´ve gotta use them...

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • 05 Apr 2004

            to be bought it must have a low price

              • S
              • Shudas
              • 05 Apr 2004

              Nothing new
              Nokia just improves old models, but there are just few high-tech models...

                • H
                • Hamza Hourani
                • 05 Apr 2004

                I thank Nokia very much for this nice new mobile 6610i because it's very nice.
                At last I would like to ask Nokia WHY 7700 iv very big and a stuped way to speak with??

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • 05 Apr 2004

                  only 4096 colours CSTN and CIF-Cam.....

                    • T
                    • TARIQ
                    • 05 Apr 2004

                    well i think thats the ultimate hadset launched by nokia and i think it should be reasonable in india

                      • 2
                      • 2Berk
                      • 05 Apr 2004

                      useless!!