Nokia 8800 Sirocco
- N
- Nate
- QXN
- 23 Jul 2007
Ahh, the sirocco...The poor mans Vertu!
- R
- Raja
- vws
- 22 Jul 2007
very cute
- D
- Den
- pY@
- 21 Jul 2007
aint no doubt sirocco is a goood phone, i had for about 9 months, and wow, its great, but its time to upgrade yourself , trust me people if you get your hands on LUNA u'll love it. i think luna is more like a ''young peoples'' phone get me, when sirocco is for everyone :D
- D
- Del Roy
- mgc
- 20 Jul 2007
Dis fone is bad u know? get me? gals luv it? me play me acon track? smack dat on it. ezzz
- P
- Phone Lover
- ijF
- 19 Jul 2007
Hi , for most people , they would not know the differance between the Sirocco and the the Luna , since the first 8800 series lanunch in 2005 , { 8810 was launch in 1998 } , I have became a big fan of them and became the proud owner , from my point of view , i think the sirocco is better than the 1st 8800 , better material , better battery life and i absoultely love the front , but since the Sirocco became too popular and i can easily see everyone having them , the fact is i got very jealous which is because everyone have the same phone , which means it is far too common . 8600 luna is actually a classy twin of the 6280 or the 6300 , but in a very classy cell . the fact i bought the 8 series is because they look great , not too common and not everyone could afford them , people who can afford 8600 luna would probably go for something useful such as N95 . I think the Luna is a cheaper version is because if you go to the high street , the Sirocco is actually charging a higher price than the Luna , everyone knows and is a fact . But since the Sirocco went on the market last November [ im not sure but i bought my sirocco in january ] it was an disappiontment which is because although it is far better than the 8800 , but still have not reach my needs . And when you open the box of the Sirocco , you would know the differance , the Sirocco comes with 2 batteries , a classy charger and in a very luxury package , but the Luna looks cheap compare to the Sirocco , from my point of view , if you buy a phone when their looks , buy the sirocco , but if you want a classy phone with a brain , buy the Luna , it is far better than the Sirocco . But I must warn you , you cant compare the Nokia N series with the 8 series , because they were made for different people with different needs , for me , i got the best of both worlds , the N95 and the 8600 . I really like my luna ,it shines .... like a little star . I think the Sirocco is more like a girls phone because the buttons on the phone is too small , but the Luna had made an improvement , i still miss my Sirocco , although the Luna is like a year newer and times better than the Sirocco , but i still think Sirocco is classier than the Luna , you will know what i mean when you put both phones on your hand . But if you really like the Luna , you have to be quick which is because they will become too popular ....
- V
- Vlad
- pki
- 19 Jul 2007
Who says sirocco is useless,overpriced,not cool,ugly it's shure that person doesn't have the money,and never got to hold one and play with it,i just got mine today,superb phone,the only problem is i have to wash my hands 10 times a day :).
- L
- Luna_Wanted
- vG7
- 16 Jul 2007
I guess in a nut shell... if you never had the 8800 and went in for the 8600, then you wouldnt know the difference.. but if you are switching from the 8800 to the 8600, then you will probably miss your 8800...
I have gotten my 8800 SE.. its just one fab phone :)
- L
- Luna_Wanted
- vGY
- 13 Jul 2007
Hi Phone lover..
what do u mean by cheaper version.. cost wise or look/class wise
Pls help me choose between the two.
- P
- Phone lover
- ijF
- 12 Jul 2007
hi , I have reasonly switch my sirocco to LG Prada , and switch back to Nokia 8600 luna , i think the Luna is a cheaper version of Sirocco , but compare the Sirocco and the Luna , the Luna is far better than the sirocco , although it is actually a cheaper version , and it is not cheap at all ......X
- s
- senverse
- wg0
- 12 Jul 2007
The 8800 is metal with a dark coating. It is nice and heavy, much more than the 8910i. Less plastic too. I love it.
- a
- ali
- NhF
- 12 Jul 2007
just wont to know if 8800 matrial is stanles or tatenium please all feed back
- L
- Luna_Wanted
- vGY
- 12 Jul 2007
What about the 8600 Luna.. guys?? You hav ethe 8800 would u switch to the new one?
- ?
- Anonymous
- w0r
- 11 Jul 2007
this phone is built to represent simplicity mixed with elegance. matches with people of class taste. really like it...
- D
- Del Roy
- mgc
- 10 Jul 2007
Phat fone blood, just a pimping styler. Get me now
- s
- senverse
- PQ2
- 07 Jul 2007
Bought it, don't regret it. My battery lasts 4-5 days which is better then other phones i use. If the camera quality is so important, then use a camera. I don't understand why people keep going on about camera features on a phone. ÏT'S A PHONE, you use it for phone calls. People should also learn how to charge their phones properly. That said, it could do with louder speakers.
- E
- E KING
- nFi
- 07 Jul 2007
I do have money to afford a Sirocco, in fact I have enough money to buy as many as I want so thats not an excuse not to like it. The truth is that it looks good, yes, but it's rabish, the features are wack, even with a 2mp cam the screen quality is not that good and the worse is the battery(poor), it's just an awful phone Overall, but if you like to spend money and unnecessarily and then regret it, I say go ahead and buy it!
- 8
- 8800 sucks!
- PZu
- 06 Jul 2007
8800 is sophistcated but useless.. had one tis b4 but changed it already coz it hungs that much..
- f
- farzam
- mCi
- 06 Jul 2007
I bought a sirroco 3 days ago,th best cell phone i ever met in my life,great,if u cannot buy it so please do not talk more!
- ?
- Anonymous
- ix5
- 05 Jul 2007
This is all about money and style, who care about the function, u 1 a camera go and buy a proper one, and finally if u despites it, that means u cannot afford it.
- ?
- Anonymous
- kPF
- 04 Jul 2007
i saw a sirocco gold today online is way overprice and a useless phone