Nokia 8 Sirocco review

GSMArena team, 04 June 2018.

The Sirocco is an Android One phone, and it's at 8.1 Oreo now

The Nokia 8 Sirocco is part of the Android One program, just like the 7 plus. The difference is the Sirocco is a true flagship-grade handset regarding build and looks and so - a viable alternative to a Pixel 2 XL for all those wanting a pure Android alternative to Google's devices. Imagine if it had a newer chipset than said Pixel.

Nokia 8 Sirocco review

Anyway, Android one means timely updates and the reality so far is proving to live up to the promise - our review unit is running Oreo 8.1 with the most recent May security patch.

Where the Pixel has an Always on display, the Nokia 8 Sirocco has Glance screen. A remnant of Lumia times, its usual behavior is to pop up every time the phone detects movement and to go off after a predefined time-out (up to 30 seconds). It can be configured to show a clock, missed calls count, unread messages count, among other small notifications. On the Sirocco, however, you can leave it on at all times - so you can always glance.

Nokia 8 Sirocco review

Android as Google intended shows up when you wake up the phone - clock, notification cards, two shortcuts on the bottom. Fingerprint enrollment uses the standard Oreo interface. Unlocking works as advertised and is quick and reliable. Past that is the standard Android 8 homescreen with a pull-up app drawer.

Lockscreen - Nokia 8 Sirocco review Ambient display - Nokia 8 Sirocco review Fingerprint enrollment - Nokia 8 Sirocco review Homescreen - Nokia 8 Sirocco review App drawer - Nokia 8 Sirocco review
Lockscreen • Ambient display • Fingerprint enrollment • Homescreen • App drawer

The quick toggles and notifications shade changes color depending on the wallpaper - white for lighter ones, black for darker ones. The task switcher is the usual rolodex and wouldn't it be great if Google put the 'clear all' button on the bottom instead of up top? Anyway, multi-window is supported natively since Nougat.

There are several gestures like double press the power button to launch the camera and fingerprint swipe for notifications.

Quick toggles - Nokia 8 Sirocco review Notifications - Nokia 8 Sirocco review Task switcher - Nokia 8 Sirocco review Multi-window - Nokia 8 Sirocco review Gestures - Nokia 8 Sirocco review
Quick toggles • Notifications • Task switcher • Multi-window • Gestures

As for multimedia, it's all in the hands of Google and its default apps. Google Photos is in charge of gallery-related tasks and video playback, while Google Play Music is the audio player. There's a file manager with batch actions and Google Drive sync, and Google's Calendar is Nokia's calendar of choice.

Google Photos - Nokia 8 Sirocco review Google Play Music - Nokia 8 Sirocco review Equalizer - Nokia 8 Sirocco review File manager - Nokia 8 Sirocco review Calendar - Nokia 8 Sirocco review
Google Photos • Google Play Music • Equalizer • File manager • Calendar

Synthetic benchmarks

One of the key complaints we have about the Nokia 8 Sirocco is that it comes with last year's chipset. There's nothing wrong with the Snapdragon 835 - it's plenty powerful, but the Sirocco will be fighting with phones packing next-gen silicon. It's in a similar position as the LG G6 was last year when LG went the S820 instead of the S835. The G6 was a bit more affordable than rivals, and all things considered, so is the Sirocco, but you'll know you're getting year-old hardware at almost the same price point as the current generation.

Nokia 8 Sirocco review

The difference in benchmark performance becomes obvious right away in GeekBench. In the single-core test, the Exynos Galaxy S9+ with its custom cores is all the way ahead, but the Snapdragon 845 devices do post significantly better scores than the S835 Sirocco (curiously, the Snapdragon Galaxy isn't quite as powerful as the Xperia and the Mi Mix 2S).

GeekBench 4.1 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    3771
  • Xiaomi Mi MIx 2S
    2468
  • Sony Xperia XZ2
    2454
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    2199
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    1987
  • OnePlus 5T
    1960
  • HTC U11+ (EU)
    1952
  • Nokia 8 Sirocco
    1934
  • Nokia 8
    1925
  • Google Pixel 2 XL
    1915
  • Huawei Mate 10 Pro
    1902
  • LG V30
    1901
  • Huawei P20
    1897
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    1862
  • Nokia 7 plus
    1634

In multi-core testing, the Exynos 9810 in the Galaxy S9+ doesn't have the same edge, and loses to the Mi Mix 2S, with the other two S45 devices slightly behind. There's a much wider gap between those and the S835 crowd, the Nokia 8 Sirocco included. Its multi-core numbers are similar to other devices with the same chip, as well as the Huawei P20 and Mate 10 Pro, both packing the Kirin 970.

GeekBench 4.1 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi MIx 2S
    9158
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    8883
  • Sony Xperia XZ2
    8466
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    8349
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    6784
  • Huawei Mate 10 Pro
    6783
  • HTC U11+ (EU)
    6740
  • Nokia 8 Sirocco
    6725
  • Huawei P20
    6722
  • OnePlus 5T
    6701
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    6590
  • Nokia 8
    6568
  • Google Pixel 2 XL
    6428
  • LG V30
    6365
  • Nokia 7 plus
    5893

That same gap in performance between this year's and last year's SoCs continues to be evident in Antutu. If that's any consolation, the Sirocco is one of the higher-scoring S835 devices, along with its non-Sirocco brother. The LG V30, for example, isn't realizing the chip's full potential, the Nokias are.

AnTuTu 7

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi MIx 2S
    270814
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    264044
  • Sony Xperia XZ2
    259244
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    246660
  • Nokia 8
    210323
  • Nokia 8 Sirocco
    209577
  • Huawei P20
    206906
  • Google Pixel 2 XL
    203119
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    201065
  • LG V30
    182374
  • Nokia 7 plus
    140820

Not quite so in graphics benchmarks, where the Nokia underperforms, posting fps numbers lower than most in the offscreen tests rendered at 1080p. It gets trickier in the onscreen tests, where the devices' resolution comes into play, but the Sirocco in the QHD team and consecutively framerates suffer.

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    61
  • Xiaomi Mi MIx 2S
    61
  • Sony Xperia XZ2
    55
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    47
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    43
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    42
  • Google Pixel 2 XL
    42
  • OnePlus 5T
    41
  • LG V30
    41
  • Nokia 8
    39
  • HTC U11+ (EU)
    39
  • Huawei Mate 10 Pro
    38
  • Huawei P20
    36
  • Nokia 8 Sirocco
    34
  • Nokia 7 plus
    15

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi MIx 2S
    55
  • Sony Xperia XZ2
    51
  • Huawei P20
    39
  • Huawei Mate 10 Pro
    35
  • OnePlus 5T
    35
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+ (Snapdragon)
    34
  • Samsung Galaxy S9+
    24
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8
    23
  • Google Pixel 2 XL
    21
  • Samsung Galaxy Note8 (SD 835)
    20
  • HTC U11+ (EU)
    20
  • LG V30
    19
  • Nokia 8
    18
  • Nokia 8 Sirocco
    18
  • Nokia 7 plus
    14

The Nokia 8 Sirocco posted predictable scores in benchmarks, ones you'd expect from a Snapdragon 835 device. That's the thing, though - Snapdragon 845 is the norm in 2018, and it's noticeably more powerful. It's unclear whether you'd be able to appreciate the difference though, and it's mostly a matter of futureproofing - if you're getting last year's hardware today, that's a year less that it'll remain relevant. Additionally, we experienced some overheating after repeated benchmark runs, and with the resulting throttling came lower scores.

Reader comments

  • Minu
  • 17 Feb 2021
  • w9K

And is the most compact smartphone with a large 16:9 display ngl

  • Minu
  • 17 Feb 2021
  • w9K

The Nokia 8 sirocco doesn't have 4k video recording in the front camera but the Nokia 8 has it

  • Mukhtar
  • 18 Jun 2020
  • xtS

Pls hw can 5mp selfie in sirocco be compared with 13mp of nokia 8 selfie