Nokia 9300i
- B
- Brad
- Yea
- 30 Nov 2005
This one has WiFi.. 802.11g no doubt!
- g
- garz
- UDV
- 30 Nov 2005
too bad for peeps expcting this one with cam, y do they always look for that feature? just to raise nonsense arguments? tsktsk.. nothin personal but dis fon is for business-minded and not for fashion individuals..
- T
- THX
- PUx
- 30 Nov 2005
Another BAD improvement... (if you say this is an improvement)...
- D
- D-Tox
- iwq
- 29 Nov 2005
i saw this prototype it was due out 2 months ago on the nokia site but they had problem with the Wlan
Wlan is the only thing improved in this phone...
not much point really
oh and if u want a computer phone buy this coz u wont c a 9 series for some time now :) dont listen to ppl saying 9700 or anything its not decided yet but they will come in end 2006 early 2007
- t
- tareqbusiness
- Sjt
- 29 Nov 2005
What is the difference between this and 9300???
I think this is a silly improvement!!!!!!!!!!
- a
- armand
- nit
- 29 Nov 2005
nice phone but no mp camera,no radio y eonder wy did they announced it,y like nokia phones,y have a 6230i good phone but not perfect,nobody and nothing is perfect,anyway this is a rather good phone and who doesen't like it DON'T BUY IT
- K
- KevinBajaj
- keA
- 29 Nov 2005
i think if it consider as business phone it shold have quad band at least since it is smart phone.If they add at least 1.5 MP camera with 3G(UMTS) that ll make this phone perfect ...I don't mind size of this phone .....anyways i think i shold wate ...........and stay with my Nokia 9290
- j
- jo
- Pv9
- 29 Nov 2005
this is just a update, wait a bit for a 9700 or 9900 =)
- h
- harold sy
- P@d
- 29 Nov 2005
this is a good phone not the best. because only one good feature that is added to this phone is IEEE 802.11g or wireless g. when nokia emailed me about this phone i thought this phone is even better than the 9500. i thought it has a at least mp camera, decent music player and higher version of symbian os. maybe ill stick to my 7710 for a while and wait for the much better and powerfull nokia phone.
- d
- dragosh
- mYY
- 29 Nov 2005
this is a business phone!so a business user doesnt need a camera!dont post any messages that say that this is a really bad phone,cuz it has no camera.its a business phone,a really good phone.if you want a camera,then buy yourself a digital camera,cuz all phone cameras are really bad.there is no phone yet to have a cmos or ccd sensor,so the pictures they take are crappy.no optical zoom,no sensor,no good lens,no nothing.the only good phone is the n90 like phone,i dont know how its called.the one with 3 mp,autofocus and 3x optical zoom.but even this amaizing camera phone doesnt have a good imaging processor.so,dont judge a phone by its camera,especially if its a business phone.
- G
- Gas
- SeF
- 29 Nov 2005
I think Nokia is scrapping the bottom of the barrel on their communicators. I honestly expected that a 9300i would be out with a camera as soon as the 9300 was announced. But nooo Nokia only added WLAN nothing else I’m very disappointed with Nokia on this phone. They did not even upgrad the Symbian I wonder who is going to buy this phone. Personally a Nokia person I was looking forward to buy a 9300i with a camera, now I have to wait for the Sony Ericson P990
- p
- prato
- i4b
- 29 Nov 2005
I completely agree No use of having this one NO CHANGES WHATSOEVER APART FROM wlan , that all u Want NOKIA Frm ur loyal customers to spend another 38000INR ON SUCH PHONE which doesnt even have looks or nor worth it WAS WAITING fr a long time ,the launch of new communicator COMPLETELY DISAPOINTED
- T
- TheOneDazz
- MF{
- 29 Nov 2005
anttipng an striker r right regardin d camera but dis fone is stil disapointin considerin how much $$ it will b an onli as 1 mor feature dan d previous 1 but is also heavier nokia seem 2 like rippin off loyal consumers
- a
- arvind gupta
- 2S{
- 29 Nov 2005
no camera , no 3g compebality , no fm radio, its a hopless phone if you want to upgrade any model that you add latest feature in the hand set
- S
- Striker
- MSN
- 29 Nov 2005
anttipng.....
I completely agree with you - this type of device does not need to be and indeed shouldn't be equipped with a camera....including one would only increase the cost and would be useless to most business users.
My main gripe with this is the fact that Nokia released the 9300 knowing full well they'd follow it up within a few months with an "updated" version. The "updates" are negligible and should have been included in the original.
- v
- vikas aggarwal
- i49
- 29 Nov 2005
awesome mobile with wondeful features in it...................I love it like any thing .................got every thing in it..
victor
- a
- anttipng
- ni5
- 29 Nov 2005
There seems to be alot of people here that don't understand that this is a phone for the corporate users. They don't want cameraphones. It's cocidered a risk as it eases attempt of espionage. R&D departments have been "no camera" zones for a long time.
- T
- TheOneDazz
- MF{
- 29 Nov 2005
very UGLI no camera an onli ting dats dif from 9300 is WLAN dis is preti much a HUGE waste ov time an $$$$
- A
- Alex
- nCE
- 29 Nov 2005
What camera? :P
- G
- Gideon
- Pj1
- 29 Nov 2005
um people... this phone has no camera