Oppo F1s review: A second take

A second take

GSMArena team, 19 August 2016.

Performance

The original Oppo F1 got a mid-range chipset courtesy of Qualcomm. However, the Chinese OEM decided to follow up with MediaTek chips on the F1 Plus and the F1s. That definitely isn't a bad thing in itself, however, while the former got some decent, although not too powerful Helio P10 silicon, the latter is stuck with a downgraded version.

Oppo F1s review

Compared to the MT6755, the MT6750 isn't true octa-core and has a lower clock speed on both the CPU and GPU. Plus, it also lacks the benefits of the 16nm production process. Performance-wise this all leaves the F1s at pretty much the same level as the original F1 if not worse. And that is not ideal for a proper successor smartphone, isn't it?

At least you still get 3GB of RAM, which is plenty for multitasking, and the 720p resolution is quite easy on the silicone when it comes to gaming performance. But overall, synthetic benchmarks look disappointing.

AnTuTu 6

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
    76186
  • Xiaomi Mi 4s
    59850
  • Oppo F1 Plus
    51299
  • Huawei Honor 5c
    51220
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
    45474
  • Meizu m3 note
    44898
  • Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
    35689
  • Oppo F1
    35353
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
    35134
  • Oppo F1s
    30657
  • Asus Zenfone Max
    25778

Basemark OS II

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
    1914
  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    1464
  • Xiaomi Mi 4s
    1303
  • OnePlus X
    1290
  • Oppo F1 Plus
    1114
  • Oppo F1
    1055
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
    956
  • Meizu m3 note
    930
  • Oppo F1s
    888
  • Xiaomi Redmi 3
    727
  • Asus Zenfone Max
    713

When given a multi-threaded task, the strength in numbers shines through, but individually, the Cortex-A53 cores fail to impress. At least the phone always runs cool and even under pressure it never gets warm.

GeekBench 3 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
    4537
  • Huawei Honor 5c
    3933
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
    3695
  • LG Nexus 5X
    3527
  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    3321
  • Oppo F1 Plus
    3242
  • Xiaomi Mi 4s
    3147
  • Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
    3061
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
    3039
  • Meizu m3 note
    3028
  • Oppo F1
    3014
  • Oppo F1s
    2967
  • Xiaomi Redmi 3
    2842
  • OnePlus X
    2297
  • Asus Zenfone Max
    1550

GeekBench 3 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
    1543
  • Xiaomi Mi 4s
    1254
  • Huawei Honor 5c
    898
  • Oppo F1 Plus
    857
  • Meizu m3 note
    807
  • Oppo F1s
    706
  • Asus Zenfone Max
    493

GPU performance tells the same sad story. The 720p display resolution does help the F1s to some extent with on-screen performance.

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • LG Nexus 5X
    16
  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    15
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
    14
  • Xiaomi Mi 4s
    13
  • OnePlus X
    9.9
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
    8.5
  • Huawei Honor 5c
    7.8
  • Oppo F1 Plus
    7
  • Oppo F1
    5.8
  • Xiaomi Redmi 3
    5.8
  • Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
    5.7
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
    5.7
  • Meizu m3 note
    5.4
  • Oppo F1s
    5.1
  • Asus Zenfone Max
    1.8

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • LG Nexus 5X
    17
  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    15
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
    14
  • Xiaomi Mi 4s
    12
  • Xiaomi Redmi 3
    12
  • Oppo F1
    11
  • Oppo F1s
    10
  • OnePlus X
    10
  • Huawei Honor 5c
    8.3
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
    7.9
  • Oppo F1 Plus
    7
  • Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
    5.7
  • Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
    5.7
  • Meizu m3 note
    5.4
  • Asus Zenfone Max
    3.9

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • LG Nexus 5X
    11
  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    10
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
    9
  • Xiaomi Mi 4s
    8.1
  • Huawei Honor 5c
    4.5
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
    4
  • Oppo F1 Plus
    3.3
  • Meizu m3 note
    2.5
  • Oppo F1s
    2.4

GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • LG Nexus 5X
    11
  • Xiaomi Mi 4c
    9.7
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
    9
  • Xiaomi Mi 4s
    7.9
  • Oppo F1s
    6
  • Huawei Honor 5c
    4.8
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
    3.9
  • Oppo F1 Plus
    3.3
  • Meizu m3 note
    2.5

Basemark X (medium)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (S650)
    23643
  • Xiaomi Mi 4s
    19854
  • Huawei Honor 5c
    16171
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Helio X10)
    15359
  • Oppo F1 Plus
    14843
  • Meizu m3 note
    11604
  • Xiaomi Redmi 3
    11088
  • Oppo F1s
    9740
  • Asus Zenfone Max
    3976

Putting numbers aside, we are satisfied with the real-life performance especially at this price point. There are some dropped frames occasionally while navigating the UI or scrolling through apps but in general, the phone behaves itself and is no problem to use.

However, if you are looking for a strong performer for heavy workloads, the Oppo F1s is perhaps not the best option.

Reader comments

  • Ubaid Ahmed
  • 10 Feb 2024
  • PSd

When will come new version of android f1s

  • Shah1604
  • 06 Feb 2024
  • xjH

The Oppo F1S is good by its Performance and support by its OS to upgrading to Marshmallow. For now, i just use this Oppo F1S for Whatsapp,Facebook,Telegram and Google Chat. For gaming i was playing PUBG Mobile,Mobile Legends and some offline 3D Games...

  • Masgammy
  • 05 Feb 2024
  • xhp

Over all good for entry level smartphone,at 2016