Oppo Find X2 Neo
- ?
- Anonymous
- 8mp
- 10 Jun 2020
joe nodden, 22 Apr 2020More like mediocre cameras. Can't even shoot 4k60 let alone... moreAnd how do you know it isn't a good phone?? People can make their own choices so be quiet
- ?
- Anonymous
- xxs
- 07 Jun 2020
Thank goodness for a great phone that is so so light in my pocket. All phones should be under 185 grams with good specs. Too many phones out there over 200 grams. Manufacturers take note.
- B
- Bro
- Ld5
- 02 Jun 2020
In Serbia, this phone cost 515 euros.
- P
- Powell
- NiB
- 23 May 2020
Spanish guy, 12 May 2020I don't understand this discussion here on spain Find x2 ne... moreThere is no way this is better than galaxy s10 or S10+ perhaps the endurance rating
- S
- Spanish guy
- MFM
- 12 May 2020
I don't understand this discussion here on spain Find x2 neo. 649€ and S10+ 749,
Oppo is better on all for 100 euros diference.
- joe nodden
- jpa
- 23 Apr 2020
Oliver, 22 Apr 2020Big breath son. You obviously dont read reviews and notice ... more"You obviously dont read reviews and notice that the same size battery can result in significantly different results in different phones." Not when the phones have the same specs. The software is still Android on all of them. A skin can only change so much. I don't know why you're bringing this up seeing as I never said anything about it.
"Thats what durability tests are for and can be hugely different" Don't even try to bring up drop tests. No drop ends up the same. A dropped phone bounces off the ground and experiences different shocks in different areas, sometimes at its weak points and it breaks, sometimes not. And every phone has its weak points. However if you're talking about the tests that jerryrigeverything does I would agree to a certain degree. Scratch tests are different. However no glass is objectively better than other glass. Harder materials don't scratch as easily, but crack easier than softer materials. There's no glass that doesn't scratch or crack. Or doesn't scratch or crack easier than all other glass. Besides, even if it was potentially more durable, you wouldn't know seeing as you've never seen anyone use it. For all you know this could be the most fragile phone ever made. What we do know is it isn't water resistant unlike the Galaxy S20, so you better hope this overpriced phone doesn't encounter water.
"Again, frugal phone, easy pocket fit, versatile cam set, although expensive but still mid range price" We already went over this. I already said, "Why are you acting like this is good because it's under $800? $800 isn't a small amount." The S20 is also under $800 and has all the better specifications I've also already mentioned. So why are you still bringing up the price when it's terrible. $800 is nowhere near mid range. And onto the size. We've already established that the S20 is smaller so why are you bringing that up. And onto the cameras. We've already established that the S20 has better cameras so why are you bringing that up. This can't even shoot at 4k60 let alone 8k. And it has a vastly inferior chip for image processing.
"If you are looking for the best cpu, you are free to go and comment under the flagships on this site." Yep, the flagships that are cheaper than this "frugal phone" yet are better in every way.
- O
- Oliver
- dZ4
- 22 Apr 2020
joe nodden, 22 Apr 2020Bruh this isn't the Find X2. It's the Find X2 Neo. And yes ... moreBig breath son. You obviously dont read reviews and notice that the same size battery can result in significantly different results in different phones. Also all phone breaks the same because they're glass?? Really?? Thats what durability tests are for and can be hugely different, which I also experienced unfortunately. Again, frugal phone, easy pocket fit, versatile cam set, although expensive but still mid range price, its all there for me. Looking forward for the reviews to confirm. If you are looking for the best cpu, you are free to go and comment under the flagships on this site.
- joe nodden
- jpa
- 22 Apr 2020
Oliver, 22 Apr 2020Take it easy.
First of all the Find X2 has great cams, y... moreBruh this isn't the Find X2. It's the Find X2 Neo. And yes battery life depends on the size. You're not gonna fit a 5000 mAh battery in a phone 7 mm thick, 70 mm wide, and 150 mm tall. And I don't recommend the S20. I said there are much better options. But this is just if you're going by the bad decision to get a phone based off size. And what issues? Every phone has it's issues. I've yet to see an opinions page on this website for a phone without someone complaining about some issue with it. And weakest battery life? M8 unless you're not in America it's got the SD865, not the Exynos 990. (The Exynos model is the only one with really pitiful battery life) That wouldn't get much worse battery life than this trash. (While also offering almost twice the performance) And did you seriously just say fragile? Every single phone nowadays is a glass sandwich, this X2 Neo is a glass sandwich. Fragility is the same on every phone nowadays and this trash is no exception.
The S20 has a much better display. Much better cameras. Much better performance. A more compact frame. A subjectively better skin. Faster storage. Your argument is pointless when the S20 is that much better. The fact that this trash has a 765G alone is enough to not get it. So don't even bother arguing.
- O
- Oliver
- dZ4
- 22 Apr 2020
joe nodden, 22 Apr 2020More like mediocre cameras. Can't even shoot 4k60 let alone... moreTake it easy.
First of all the Find X2 has great cams, your assumption for the smaller brother is nonsense. Battery life also does not only depend on the size. You recommend samsung which has a long list of issues reported by users, one of the weakest battery life, worst of all extremely fragile (at least the smallest), so fragile some review sites give warnings at the end of their reviews. So how does it fit the criteria beyond good cams?
- joe nodden
- jpa
- 22 Apr 2020
Oliver, 21 Apr 2020Need a light/small phone, good cameras /telephoto and good ... moreMore like mediocre cameras. Can't even shoot 4k60 let alone the 8k30 that some phones nowadays can shoot. And no that 4000 mAh battery is not good. There are phones with much larger batteries. This'll get mediocre battery life at best.
Why are you acting like this is good because it's under $800? $800 isn't a small amount. You can get the very superior Galaxy S20 for that price. A phone that is lighter if you care about that, and within .2 mm of the thickness of this, not to mention it has the Snapdragon 865. Way better than this trash. There are better options than the S20, (for cheaper) but if you're frail enough to struggle to hold a few more grams I guess those aren't for you.
Don't know what's wrong in your head that makes you think this is a good phone.
- joe nodden
- jpa
- 22 Apr 2020
Only a 765G and literally no other redeeming features for over 700? What kind of bad prank is this? Oh Oppo how far you've fallen.
- O
- Oliver
- M8r
- 21 Apr 2020
Need a light/small phone, good cameras /telephoto and good battery. 765g makes it a sub USD800 phone even better. Cant care less about the cpu.
- ?
- Anonymous
- NuU
- 21 Apr 2020
Anonymous, 21 Apr 2020why is this so expensive ? it is not even top of the line c... moreToo expensive why oppo company products are so expensive why??????
- ?
- Anonymous
- 61j
- 21 Apr 2020
why is this so expensive ? it is not even top of the line chipset ..765G