Oppo Find X8 Ultra's Snapdragon 8 Elite benchmark tests are in

Ivan, 14 April 2025

While we're working on the Oppo Find X8 Ultra review, we thought we'll share the benchmark results as they are bow ready. Before we look at the numbers, let's talk hardware, because there's more to the ticker inside Oppo's latest than just the name.

The Find X8 Ultra uses the 3nm Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, the full-fat 8-core variant. Ours is the 16GB version, making this the most potent model you can get. Oppo claims a 45% CPU and 40% GPU speed increase over the Find X7 Ultra.

The Oryon CPU packs two 4.32GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L cores and six 3.53GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M cores. The GPU is the Adreno 830 with 768 shading units, 1536 total shaders, 3379.2 GFLOPS of output, and a 1.1GHz clock speed.

Oppo has packaged Snapdragon's finest with a graphite heat dissipation design with a vapor chamber head spreader that brings 2000W/(m·K) thermal conductivity.

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite benchmark tests are in

The Oppo Find X8 Ultra scores near the top in all of our tests. It's second in both the single and multi-core Geekbench 6 tests, tops AnTuTu 10, beating the OnePlus 13 and Xiaomi 15 Ultra, and took second again in both 3DMark tests - Wild Life Extreme at 4K, and Solar Bay at Quad HD.

You'll need to wait until our full review for the throttling test!

GeekBench 6

Multi-core
Single-core

Galaxy S25 Ultra

9846

Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy 512GB, 12GB RAM

Oppo Find X8 Ultra

9503

Snapdragon 8 Elite 512GB, 16GB RAM

Xiaomi 15 Ultra

9464

Snapdragon 8 Elite 512GB, 16GB RAM

OnePlus 13

9278

Snapdragon 8 Elite 512GB, 16GB RAM

iPhone 16 Pro Max

8606

Apple A18 Pro 512GB, 8GB RAM

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

6472

Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 512GB, 16GB RAM

Pixel 9 Pro XL

4854

Google Tensor G4 128GB, 16GB RAM

AnTuTu 10

Oppo Find X8 Ultra

2710432

Snapdragon 8 Elite 512GB, 16GB RAM 1440 x 3168 px

OnePlus 13

2690491

Snapdragon 8 Elite 512GB, 16GB RAM 1440 x 3168 px

Xiaomi 15 Ultra

2661565

Snapdragon 8 Elite 512GB, 16GB RAM 1440 x 3200 px

Galaxy S25 Ultra

2207809

Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy 512GB, 12GB RAM 1440 x 3120 px

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

1981027

Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 512GB, 16GB RAM 1440 x 3168 px

iPhone 16 Pro Max

1838828

Apple A18 Pro 512GB, 8GB RAM 1320 x 2868 px

Pixel 9 Pro XL

1380138

Google Tensor G4 128GB, 16GB RAM 1280 x 2856 px

3DMark

Wild Life Extreme (2160p)
Solar Bay (1440p)

Galaxy S25 Ultra

6687

Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy Adreno 830 1440 x 3120 px

Oppo Find X8 Ultra

6644

Snapdragon 8 Elite Adreno 830 1440 x 3168 px

OnePlus 13

6615

Snapdragon 8 Elite Adreno 830 1440 x 3168 px

Xiaomi 15 Ultra

6265

Snapdragon 8 Elite Adreno 830 1440 x 3200 px

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

4806

Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Adreno 750 1440 x 3168 px

iPhone 16 Pro Max

4731

Apple A18 Pro Apple GPU (6-core) 1320 x 2868 px

Pixel 9 Pro XL

2540

Google Tensor G4 Mali-G715 MC7 1280 x 2856 px

Reader comments

vik457
14 hours ago
LfV

Yeah, to push them to use dcg in all video modes, not just log recording and in optimal 4 stops of conversion gain, even stabilisation issue is partly related to exposure.

Aierlan
15 hours ago
Eaj

Ah, yeah. I'm not saying it's not useful. Just saying Xiaomi needs to improve their lowlight video quality in particular, whatever sensor is used. The lowlight video quality and stabilisation on the Xiaomi 15 ultra is really quite weak eve...

jiyen235
15 hours ago
2WB

im sorry but what exactly are you complaining about? I gave a very balanced take and praised a lot of phones from a wide variety of brands. What hurt you here?