Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review

GSMArena Team, 18 December 2020.

ColorOS is a step behind in v7.1, Android is 10

The Reno4 Z 5G runs ColorOS 7.1 - that's 0.1 less than the majority of recent Oppos, including the Reno4 Pro and Reno4 Pro 5G. Hardly a dealbreaker since there's not much difference between the two, but it just goes to show that the Z might be a little slower to get updates. It's still Android 10 that's underneath the in-house UI layer.

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review

The homescreen situation is predictable - you get to choose between the simplified approach with all the apps arranged on the homescreens or the two-tiered homescreen + app drawer way. The UI basics are entirely ordinary.

Lockscreen - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Homescreen - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Folder view - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review App Drawer - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Quick toggles and notifications - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Task switcher - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review
Lockscreen • Homescreen • Folder view • App Drawer • Quick toggles and notifications • Task switcher

We found no theme store on this unit, and there was just a single theme pre-installed, so customization isn't great in this respect. The app icons themselves, on the other hand, are highly customizable.

Homescreen settings - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Homescreen settings - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Homescreen mode - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Swipe down options - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review A theme - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Icon settings - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review
Homescreen settings • Homescreen settings • Homescreen mode • Swipe down options • A theme • Icon settings

Navigation options are aplenty too. The standard Android 10 navigation, which employs the side edges for going Back while upward swipes from the bottom take you Home, is called Swipe Gestures from Both Sides in ColorOS, and that would be our top choice.

Color OS has a gesture for a quick switch between the last two apps if you swipe in for Back, but hold for a brief instant. That's optional, and it can work in addition to the default side swiping on the bottom of the screen.

A classic three-button navigation bar is available if you're old school like that, and it lets you choose between two layouts. There's also a More option, which will take you to the Swipe-up gestures alternative - the middle option between the navbar and real gestures.

The Smart Sidebar feature we've seen on other ColorOS builds is here too. A swipe in from the side opens a toolbar with actions and shortcuts. You can customize them and also adjust the bar's position and opacity.

Navigation options - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Smart sidebar - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Smart sidebar - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Smart sidebar - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Smart sidebar - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Smart sidebar - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review
Navigation options • Smart sidebar

The Reno4 Z 5G's display supports a 120Hz refresh rate, and you get a four-way setting between 120Hz, 90Hz, 60Hz, and Auto. As we detailed on the previous page, that setting is only ever set in stone if you have it at the 60Hz position, with the other modes adjusting it to optimize the experience.

There's a system-wide dark mode, and it can be engaged permanently or according to a schedule. It'll invoke supported apps' dark themes, but you can also enforce dark mode on third-party apps that don't have it built-in. There is no Always-on display on the Reno4 Z 5G.

Refresh rate settings - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Dark mode - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Dark mode - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Dark mode - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Dark mode - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Dark mode - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review
Refresh rate settings • Dark mode

Unlocking the Reno4 Z 5G is best done using the capacitive fingerprint sensor on the right. As far as this type of implementation goes, the one on the Reno is among the better ones - it didn't discriminate between the left index finger and right thumb and unlocked swiftly and consistently. If, however, you find yourself suffering from a common inherent flaw of such fingerprint readers - accidental touches with any part of your hand triggering it, you can have it engage with a press on the button, which is otherwise not required.

Basic face recognition is available too. It uses just the selfie cam (so no fancy 3D scanning) and isn't as secure as the fingerprint reader, but it's fast and convenient. The phone can be set to require at least one open eye for added security.

Biometric security settings - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Biometric security settings - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Biometric security settings - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Biometric security settings - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Biometric security settings - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Biometric security settings - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review
Biometric security settings

Drawing letters on a turned-off screen remains a staple of ColorOS, and it is present on the Reno4 Z 5G as well. As usual, the torch and the camera app are probably the most useful assignments. In this version of ColorOS, you cannot launch the camera with a double press on the volume buttons as you can on ColorOS 7.2, so the screen off gesture remains a viable option.

Gesture shortcuts - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Gesture shortcuts - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Gesture shortcuts - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Gesture shortcuts - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review
Gesture shortcuts

The multimedia apps such as Photos, Music, and Videos are provided by Oppo. There's a File Manager, a Phone Manager, and a few other tools pre-installed, including a custom calculator and a voice recorder. As has been the trend with recent handsets by the company, the replacement of the in-house Phone and Messages apps for Google's own has made its way to the Reno4 Z 5G too.

Gallery - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Videos - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review File Manager - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Phone Manager - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Calculator - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review Voice recorder - Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review
Gallery • Videos • File Manager • Phone Manager • Calculator • Voice recorder

Synthetic benchmarks

The Dimensity 800 is in charge of doing the calcs on the Reno4 Z 5G, a Mediatek midrange SoC that also goes by MT6873V. Only a U separates it from the 800U that we saw on the Realme 7 5G just a couple of weeks ago, but that U makes quite the difference in the core configuration, in fact.

The Dimensity 800 we have here has 4 Cortex-A76 cores and 4 Cortex-A55 ones, compared to the 2xA76 + 6xA55 arrangement in the Dimensity 800U. On the other hand, the beefy A76s are capped at 2.0Ghz on this one, while they can go as high as 2.4GHz on the U. A similar core count vs. clock rate trade-off can be seen in the GPU department; otherwise, the same Mali-G57 base design - the 800U uses three cores, the 800 here in the Reno has four.

The Oppo Reno4 Z 5G is only available in a single memory configuration with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage.

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G review

In the CPU-focused GeekBench, we see the first difference between the two Dimensities quite clearly - the Reno trails in single-core performance on account of its relatively low clock speed. Still, it captures the lead in multi-core results thanks to the many high-performance cores. The Reno is also superior to the Snapdragon 765 bunch under multi-core loads by a healthy margin, though it doesn't compare favorably in single-core tasks.

GeekBench 5 (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
    2196
  • Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
    2009
  • OnePlus Nord
    1953
  • Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
    1927
  • Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
    1898
  • Galaxy A51 5G
    1867
  • OnePlus Nord N10 5G
    1848
  • Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
    1805
  • Realme 7 5G
    1794
  • Poco X3 NFC
    1777
  • Motorola Moto G8 Power
    1394

GeekBench 5 (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Galaxy A51 5G
    677
  • Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
    661
  • Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
    616
  • Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
    615
  • OnePlus Nord
    610
  • OnePlus Nord N10 5G
    608
  • Realme 7 5G
    598
  • Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
    589
  • Poco X3 NFC
    568
  • Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
    522
  • Motorola Moto G8 Power
    311

In Antutu, the Reno doesn't strictly impress either, though it's not as far behind the SD765s as in the single-core CPU test.

AnTuTu 8

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
    318882
  • Realme 7 5G
    318535
  • Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
    318117
  • Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
    317139
  • Galaxy A51 5G
    316007
  • OnePlus Nord
    312794
  • Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
    299926
  • Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
    295562
  • Poco X3 NFC
    283750
  • OnePlus Nord N10 5G
    279579
  • Samsung Galaxy A51
    175363
  • Motorola Moto G8 Power
    173607

When it comes to graphics, the Reno4 Z 5G doesn't pull ahead of the Realme 7 5G in GFXBench despite having an extra core - hence our speculation that the GPU cores in the Dimensity 800 are clocked lower. The two phones are mostly on par and produce results comparable to the handsets using the SD765 with Adreno 620 GPU - so about as good as graphics get in the midrange. The Galaxy A51 5G, packing an Exynos 980 is ever so slightly behind, while the non-5G A51 is substantially slower, as expected of its modest SoC.

GFX Manhattan ES 3.1 (offscreen 1080p)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
    38
  • OnePlus Nord
    38
  • Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
    37
  • Realme 7 5G
    35
  • Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
    34
  • Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
    33
  • Poco X3 NFC
    33
  • Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
    33
  • Galaxy A51 5G
    32
  • OnePlus Nord N10 5G
    26
  • Motorola Moto G8 Power
    13

GFX Manhattan ES 3.1 (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus Nord
    34
  • Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
    32
  • Realme 7 5G
    31
  • Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
    31
  • Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
    29
  • Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
    29
  • Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
    28
  • Galaxy A51 5G
    28
  • Poco X3 NFC
    27
  • OnePlus Nord N10 5G
    23
  • Motorola Moto G8 Power
    12

GFX Car Chase ES 3.1 (offscreen 1080p)

Higher is better

  • Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
    21
  • OnePlus Nord
    21
  • Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
    21
  • Realme 7 5G
    20
  • Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
    20
  • Galaxy A51 5G
    20
  • Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
    19
  • Poco X3 NFC
    19
  • Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
    19
  • OnePlus Nord N10 5G
    14
  • Motorola Moto G8 Power
    7.1

GFX Car Chase ES 3.1 (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus Nord
    19
  • Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
    18
  • Realme 7 5G
    17
  • Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
    17
  • Galaxy A51 5G
    17
  • Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
    16
  • Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
    16
  • Poco X3 NFC
    16
  • Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
    16
  • OnePlus Nord N10 5G
    13
  • Motorola Moto G8 Power
    6.6

Aztek Vulkan High (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus Nord
    13
  • Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
    12
  • Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
    12
  • Realme 7 5G
    11
  • Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
    11
  • Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
    11
  • Poco X3 NFC
    11
  • Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
    11
  • Galaxy A51 5G
    9.9
  • OnePlus Nord N10 5G
    8.7

GFX Aztek ES 3.1 High (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • OnePlus Nord
    13
  • Realme 7 5G
    12
  • Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
    12
  • Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
    12
  • Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
    12
  • Galaxy A51 5G
    12
  • Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
    11
  • Poco X3 NFC
    11
  • OnePlus Nord N10 5G
    5.7

In fact, in 3D Mark, the Reno4 Z 5G actually takes the lead of this esteemed mid-tier group, both in the OpenGL test and in Vulkan.

3DMark SSE ES 3.1 (offscreen 1440p)

Higher is better

  • Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
    3308
  • Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
    3294
  • Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
    3288
  • OnePlus Nord
    3285
  • Realme 7 5G
    3163
  • Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
    3031
  • Galaxy A51 5G
    2837
  • Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
    2789
  • Poco X3 NFC
    2689
  • OnePlus Nord N10 5G
    2166
  • Samsung Galaxy A51
    1574

3DMark SSE Vulkan 1.0 (offscreen 1440p)

Higher is better

  • Oppo Reno4 Z 5G
    3180
  • Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
    3080
  • OnePlus Nord
    3067
  • Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G
    3062
  • Realme 7 5G
    3028
  • Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
    2821
  • Galaxy A51 5G
    2778
  • Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite
    2595
  • Poco X3 NFC
    2495
  • OnePlus Nord N10 5G
    2012
  • Samsung Galaxy A51
    1554

The Reno4 Z 5G is more than adequately powered thanks to the Mediatek Dimensity 800 chipset. The only setback is its lower-than-average single-core CPU performance, but in both multi-core tasks and GPU-related loads, the Reno is about as good as any Snapdragon 765 powered midranger.

Reader comments

  • Wloogolf
  • 21 Sep 2021
  • CcJ

I regret buying this phone. So many problems, so few things work properly/well. I can't return the phone because I can't say categorically what is wrong with it. Just about everything fails every two-three days but not every day. Utterly ...

Definitely is. Happens to me as well, I think this is because they made the phone too good for too cheap, has many drawbacks. Probably gonna get a new phone and sell or give to my sister that still uses an iPhone 5s :)

  • Anonymous
  • 15 Jan 2021
  • HDy

I'm getting upwards of 8h on 60hz. Something wrong with your battery? Must try 120hz though. Just try 90, a nice little compromise.