Huawei Mate 10, 10 Pro and 10 Porsche Design hands-on review
- ?
- Anonymous
- RxV
- 16 Oct 2017
What about the speaker? Is it still stereo hybrid (front facing and bottom facing) or single bottom facing?
- ?
- Anonymous
- IV5
- 16 Oct 2017
Your head in the 360 camera hahaha.
There were rumours the amoled is supplied by boe. Maybe you can check. Also unlikely Samsung will sell 2k amoled to anyone, even apple did not get them.
- I
- Imperator Neubaticus
- 7Xe
- 16 Oct 2017
Qhd ips lcd = inferior, less battery efficient display
Fhd amoled = inferior, battery efficient display
Dunno which is better to be honest. Lol huawei
- vrvly
- MR0
- 16 Oct 2017
Shots looks perfect, almost no noise but colors do not pop out so much, wonder why.
- F
- FinnishInquisition
- m}I
- 16 Oct 2017
Anonymous, 16 Oct 2017Uhm doesn't S8 have both ip68 and 3.5? Also if they could m... moreSamsung has actually managed a lot of neat tricks with their latest models (apart from repairability due to how crammed everything is). This includes the IP68 rating, thinness and battery size in spite of including a 3.5 mm jack.
It should be noted though that water and dust ingress is not covered by the typical warranty, and Samsung has had devices fail for that very thing. Having another port is to have another point of potential failure over time. The 3.5 mm port is nice to have, but not without its own drawbacks.
- ?
- Anonymous
- X%7
- 16 Oct 2017
FinnishInquisition, 16 Oct 2017The reason the Mate 10 only has IP53 unlike the IP67 Pro is... moreUhm doesn't S8 have both ip68 and 3.5? Also if they could make a phone with type c port ip67, IMO it shouldn't be hard for an extra port. But that's just me
- E
- Eksa
- Sf$
- 16 Oct 2017
Mate 10 Pro No 3.5mm audio jack? No
Mate 10 No Amoled? No
Next
- H
- HeavyRazzer
- 0nx
- 16 Oct 2017
Good devices, but again - "no"
bot-pro version looks good in everything, but no IP67(8).
Pro-version has IP67 (why not 68?), but low screen resolution (1080+ can be ok for IPS, not for amoled with pentile matrix) and no 3.5 jack.
This is really strange, when basic version has better screen than Pro.
Display quality is unknown: previous Huawei devices lack good factory calibration.
- F
- FinnishInquisition
- m}I
- 16 Oct 2017
The reason the Mate 10 only has IP53 unlike the IP67 Pro is probably because of that 3.5 mm AUX port, which is always a tricky thing to prevent dust and water ingress to.
But I cannot for the life of me understand why they only went with Bluetooth 4.2 instead of 5. The whole specification sheet screams of "Do we future-proof our phone or not?".
- C
- CM3
- X{v
- 16 Oct 2017
AnonD-304305, 16 Oct 2017If only huawei made the secondary camera as wide angle, i w... moreSeems like the perfect phone...other than the foliage looking like oilpaint.
- ?
- Anonymous
- dPU
- 16 Oct 2017
It's a shame another company went without 3,5 jack in its premium offering. Really dissapointed, although it was kinda expected...
- D
- AnonD-304305
- Ki0
- 16 Oct 2017
If only huawei made the secondary camera as wide angle, i would be very happy. I know that their potrait mode is good, but there's too few company that applied wide angle secondary camera