Samsung Galaxy A32 5G review
- B
- Bubacarr
- SbN
- 12 Jun 2021
I want this phone
- m
- miaumiaumiau
- Mtf
- 12 Jun 2021
Anonymous, 12 Jun 202110 III is much more expensive. Did you drink your coffee today?in my country 10 III is double A325G. so yeah...even gsmarena puts it at 225 on amazon.de, vs 400 for the sony. and I bet that will probaby be 175-200 with some discounts.
- ?
- Anonymous
- vjX
- 12 Jun 2021
Syuser, 12 Jun 202110 III is cheaper, faster and perfect for any use. Camera w... more10 III is much more expensive. Did you drink your coffee today?
- s
- sudhansh aarav
- gMC
- 12 Jun 2021
dear samsung please stop this nonsense work on smartphone. learn from realme or mi smart phones.
- A
- Amirul Syafiq
- YUU
- 12 Jun 2021
Mother Russia, 12 Jun 2021A52 4G has 90hz 1080p super amoled while the 5G has 720p TF... moreLolll that one for a32 and a32 5g, not for a52 and a52 5g
- ?
- Anonymous
- TL%
- 12 Jun 2021
Syuser, 12 Jun 202110 III is cheaper, faster and perfect for any use. Camera w... moreThis phone costs around €50 less than 10 iii.
- N
- No One
- Hks
- 12 Jun 2021
Lol, 12 Jun 2021Pros - 4k video. Cons - no 4k video. Great article. No 4K recording on *Ultrawide camera*. Basic english comprehension.
- M
- Mother Russia
- sr%
- 12 Jun 2021
Question Man, 12 Jun 2021Did this author actually read the A52 vs A52 5G reviews? as... moreA52 4G has 90hz 1080p super amoled while the 5G has 720p TFT display which is big downgrade from 4G display. Also 4G has a little bit better cameras on front and back. 5G can record 4k@30 while 4G can only record 1080p@30. Also
- m
- miaumiaumiau
- y5m
- 12 Jun 2021
lets clarify some things.
1.the guy sayd the ultrawide doesnt have 4k recording. the primary support 4k 30.
2.the downgrades vs a32 4G are:
-a325g has a 720p, tft display vs full hd amoled 90hz
-the camera is 48mp vs 64mp.
-selfie camera is 13mp vs 20mp.
-fingerprint is under display on 4g vs side mounted on 5G
I know that higher megapickels dont make the phone make better pictures, but I point diferences.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0mu
- 12 Jun 2021
Lol, 12 Jun 2021Pros - 4k video. Cons - no 4k video. Great article. I see that as well, bring the article to some unprofessional level somehow.
- B
- Bruno
- mjL
- 12 Jun 2021
really too big, not interesting
- S
- Syuser
- nD%
- 12 Jun 2021
10 III is cheaper, faster and perfect for any use. Camera will and can be perfected and some third party. This is a trashsung for ones who need at most one year device. Stay away!
- A
- Amirul Syafiq
- YUU
- 12 Jun 2021
Amirul Syafiq, 12 Jun 2021I don't understand why the author said there are some ... moreAs what I know the price difference between a52 5g and regular one are quite noticeable
- A
- Amirul Syafiq
- YUU
- 12 Jun 2021
I don't understand why the author said there are some downgrade of a52 5g compared to regular a52, maybe anyone can explain which part that a52c5g downgrade if compared to regular a52.
- P
- Panda eyes
- mE0
- 12 Jun 2021
because its a very weak processor and targeted more for lower end A phones like the A21s and below. The Mediatek 720g in this phone is comparable to the SD 720
- Q
- Question Man
- k0M
- 12 Jun 2021
Did this author actually read the A52 vs A52 5G reviews? as far as i'm aware there weren't any downgrades. in fact, the A52 5G is a better device by all measures
- L
- Lol
- gJt
- 12 Jun 2021
Pros - 4k video.
Cons - no 4k video.
Great article.
- E
- Essen
- K8T
- 12 Jun 2021
Phones like these were the reason that flagships were the only alternatives before the Moto G and the Chinese arrived. Moto seems to have lost its mojo. But say what you want about Xiaomi or BBK. They have 10 better alternatives under each of their sub brands than this.
- ?
- Anonymous
- TL%
- 12 Jun 2021
The good thing is the battery life.