Xiaomi 14T review

30 September 2024


Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • pXr
  • 01 Oct 2024

In Denmark, the choice is easy, since no carriers currently offer subsidiaries 14t and T PRO series..
So for a lower price I can get the Samsung Galaxy 24 FE with plenty of power, excellent build quality (no plastic) and 7 years of software support

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • pXr
    • 01 Oct 2024

    Anonymous, 30 Sep 2024Did you factor in the price? For what you get in terms of d... moreIt is not cheap in Europe..

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • 0p}
      • 01 Oct 2024

      Aierlan, 01 Oct 2024They do get the specs wrong sometimes but I think they are ... moreI've actually held the phone at a Xiaomi store. The frame and the back of the titan coloured phones feel metallic. So I was surprised to learn from the review that it's plastic. The back of the green coloured phone is vegan leather and feels quite nice. It's the only one that has a textured and not smooth back.

        dannejanne, 01 Oct 2024According to Xiaomi official site: "Meticulously c... moreThey do get the specs wrong sometimes but I think they are right on the frame this time. It seems to be plastic as there are no antenna lines. Note that the Xiaomi 14t pro says that the frame is 'Aluminium alloy metallic frame' but for the Xiaomi 14t it just states the 'deco' is metallic i.e. the decoration is metallic. This is probably the deco on the edges of the phone (that is the bracket around the frame) and possibly on the camera module edges (guessing here for the camera module as it does look a little metallic around the edges). Xiaomi doesn't actually state that the frame is metallic for the 14T. It seems that the frame itself is plastic.

          According to Xiaomi official site:

          "Meticulously crafted from high-strength 6M13 aluminium alloy, yielding a design that stands out at first glance."

          This wouldn't be the first time GSMArena gets the build materials wrong in their review.

            • G
            • Gusta
            • tDG
            • 01 Oct 2024

            Anonymous, 01 Oct 2024Xiaomi didn't get to No.2 because of brand power. They... moreTrue, Huawei doesn't sell phone at cheap price but already been no 1 in sales when they were banned with a little bit margin from Samsung.

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • LfV
              • 01 Oct 2024

              Gusta, 01 Oct 2024D8300 is also not power efficent. That's why battery e... moreIf you see web browser score it has been improved by 10%, it's other scores that got worse and 2 of these othere scores don't concern cpu. Anyways d8400 is gonna use a720 cores, which will make it more efficient and also on newer node

                • ?
                • Anonymous
                • Sme
                • 01 Oct 2024

                Anonymous, 30 Sep 2024Poco X6 Pro at 2x-3x price.poco times are over when u got good value for money.

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • 0p}
                  • 01 Oct 2024

                  Foldy boi, 01 Oct 2024No, he's got a point. If everyone was sensible and did... moreXiaomi didn't get to No.2 because of brand power. They actually made price competitive phones that were value for money. The phone makers relying on brand power to fleece their customers are Apple and Samsung.

                    PureOS, 30 Sep 2024Nice joke. Xiaomi is number 2 seller now. Your propaganda d... moreNo, he's got a point. If everyone was sensible and didn't care about branding Oneplus/ honor would be top of the market now. Assuming that the US didn't ban Huawei, they would be the top of the market now.

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • Brt
                      • 01 Oct 2024

                      Anonymous, 30 Sep 2024Did you factor in the price? For what you get in terms of d... moreFair call

                        • G
                        • Gusta
                        • XTk
                        • 01 Oct 2024

                        Anonymous, 30 Sep 20247+ gen 3 actually has worse gpu efficiency and no hardware ... moreD8300 is also not power efficent. That's why battery endurance score is worse than last year 13T.

                        I said SD 7+ Gen 3 is minimum and 8s Gen 3 is welcome. For cutting the price, it doesn't need 144 Hz screen. 120 Hz is more than enough because 14T is not gaming oriented phone. IMHO

                          • G
                          • Gusta
                          • XTk
                          • 01 Oct 2024

                          PureOS, 30 Sep 2024They have same antutu score and same cortex architecture.What are u talking about?

                          SD 7+ Gen 3 has 1 cortex X4, 4 cortex A720, 3 cortex A520.

                          D8300 only has older 4 cortex A715 and 4 cortex A510.

                            I hope Xiaomi do something about the poor battery life in their future units (F7)...

                            And by the way, why do GSMArena write "Unspecified" in the FM radio section?? Is it that difficult to test a radio?? All they have to do is simply turning the radio on, it merely takes a few seconds to check the presence/absence of this marvelous feature!

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • vaS
                              • 30 Sep 2024

                              Poco X6 Pro at 2x-3x price.

                                • N
                                • N
                                • JU%
                                • 30 Sep 2024

                                The hardware is great, but HyperOS (a disguised MIUI) is currently the worst Android skin (even worse than Infinix XOS).

                                  Gusta, 30 Sep 2024From geekbench database, SD 7+ Gen 3 has faster benchmark. ... moreThey have same antutu score and same cortex architecture.

                                    • R
                                    • Riles
                                    • raN
                                    • 30 Sep 2024

                                    Anonymous, 30 Sep 2024Now just because you plan to get this as your next phone do... moreCouldn’t agree more. A “Flagship Killer” is more than the chipset and display. It also includes a big one, DESIGN QUALITY. Plastic is a Samsung from a decade ago. But what is expected from China these days is sub-par and the fan boys will still jump on it. Just like any product fanboy. Say what you want about Sammy and Apple however, their quality is something that a Chinese designed and built product will never come close to.

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • LfV
                                      • 30 Sep 2024

                                      Gusta, 30 Sep 2024From geekbench database, SD 7+ Gen 3 has faster benchmark. ... more7+ gen 3 actually has worse gpu efficiency and no hardware av1 decoding

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • Sme
                                        • 30 Sep 2024

                                        xiaomi sucks not offering chargers why ?? prices just higher every year.... a joke!!!