vivo X200 Pro review

26 October 2024


Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • 0p}
  • 27 Oct 2024

jiyen235, 26 Oct 2024this phone charges faster with a 6000 mah battery.... the s... moreBecause it was reduced from 100.
Not because they think 90 is slow.

    • X
    • Xx
    • 3$f
    • 26 Oct 2024

    Look at yourself. Talking about the design like it would be anything important.

      • P
      • PaxLucis
      • GLx
      • 26 Oct 2024

      Shamrock Sean, 26 Oct 2024Apple and design language?? 🤣 Hilarious it's the most ... moreSimplicity is beauty and obviously, you don't know that.

        PaxLucis, 26 Oct 2024What a cheap, ugly looking rear camera design! Looks like a... moreApple and design language?? 🤣 Hilarious it's the most boring design ever

          • ?
          • Anonymous
          • LfV
          • 26 Oct 2024

          PaxLucis, 26 Oct 2024What a cheap, ugly looking rear camera design! Looks like a... moreAh yes, gas stove with three bumps in triangle

            • T
            • Tmswm
            • Ibx
            • 26 Oct 2024

            jiyen235, 26 Oct 2024No V3+ Chip and the UW cam is worse, so you're basical... moreHave compared both yourself?
            I have them both here and regarding the main camera that's just not true. If anything they're equal and in dim lighting X200 takes it

              • P
              • PaxLucis
              • GLx
              • 26 Oct 2024

              What a cheap, ugly looking rear camera design! Looks like an old electric stove! Apple is definitely miles ahead when it comes to design language. It's like comparing Da Vinci's Mona Lisa to an artwork made by a 3 year old with ADHD! #AppleSupremacy

                David 040882, 26 Oct 2024Because the 90W output here isn't actually delivering ... morethis phone charges faster with a 6000 mah battery.... the s24 ultra didn't have charging speed as con but this does, why so harsh with chinese phones only? That's the other guy's complaint i think.

                Besides, apart from Oppo/Oneplus I don't think no one else has such great fast charging capabilities with good battery life. And like, since this is their 2nd time using the Si/C battery, they're still being conservative with the charging speeds and Vivo has been a tad bit more conservative with charging speeds compared to others. I think this phone shows the huge step up in confidence compared to the first/second gen Si/C battery, like look at the increase in size yet also the increase in charging speed compared to the X100 Ultra.

                Curious to see what Oppo and Oneplus cook up with their phones but it's kinda harsh to put the charging speed as a con when the S24 Ultra didn't have it as a con despite having a smaller battery and lower battery life, the Z60 Ultra didn't have it despite having slower charging than this on the well established Li-Po battery type and the Pixel/iPhones didn't have it as a con either despite being average. Idk man. That's just harsh for the sake of being harsh.

                  Jon8652, 26 Oct 2024How is 90W charging speed a Con, while iPhones and galaxies... moreBecause the 90W output here isn't actually delivering 90W apparently. Just look at the comparison with other smartphones. The 45W of the S24 Ultra is nearly as fast as the 90W of the X200 Pro for the first 15 and 30 minutes. And the Magic 6 Pro's 66W surpasses the X200 Pro by a fair margin in speed. So it's not that it's slow charging, it's that it is not 90W worth of speed

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • 0p}
                    • 26 Oct 2024

                    Anonymous, 26 Oct 2024What do you mean with sensor technology of main cam and 2x zoom?2x2 OCL is less effective for digital zoom compared to 2x1 .
                    Imx989 and LYT900 do not use 2x2.

                      Eric20, 26 Oct 2024The photos are impressive. Noise reduction in the shadows i... morethank the V3+ chip

                        Aierlan, 26 Oct 2024The main camera is definitely a downgrade from the x100 pro... morethe periscope and the main cam seem to be not tuned as well. I think this needs one to two more months of updates to really be good, OR it could be that the sensor's THAT bad? Idk, i've seen the X100 Ultra, 14 Ultra and the Find X7 Ultra at launch and after a lot of updates, things changed dramatically. I hope it just needs more updates.

                          • T
                          • TCPA
                          • f{q
                          • 26 Oct 2024

                          Love this phone. Excellent overall. I am the first customer in my city, Shenyang China
                          People are just super overreacting the camera glare problem. 99.9% of the time its not there. Use the phone like a normal person and you are good to go! Surprisingly theres no notification delays when using whatsapp! Google works all good.

                            Sustained Performance is as good as last gen SoCs. Temperatures are good. Battery life is good. Looks like Dimensity 9400 has done a good job. 8 Elite is going to be even better. These next gen chips are doing amazing so far.

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • LfV
                              • 26 Oct 2024

                              Aierlan, 26 Oct 2024The main camera is definitely a downgrade from the x100 pro... moreWhat do you mean with sensor technology of main cam and 2x zoom?

                                Auguste, 26 Oct 2024Can’t wait for the Vivo X200 Pro Mini review, it literally ... moreNo V3+ Chip and the UW cam is worse, so you're basically trading a better UW cam for a better telephoto cam. I think the Mini is the best compact phone out now but not by a huge margin. Vivo nerfed it too hard. Needed either a better main cam, better UW cam, a better telephoto cam or AT LEAST the V3+ Chip.

                                  And it seems BOE put their money where their mouth is this year, absolutely TOP NOTCH stuff! I just wish Vivo weren't so conservative with the control they give to the user in terms of manual brightness. L move imo, even the Find X7 Ultra reached 800 nits in manual mode and that phone was 800-ish nits dimmer in auto mode lmao. I'd be interested in seeing sustained brightness tests, these phones get bright yeah but some sustained numbers would be super helpful.

                                  The speakers have a nice frequency response and seem to distort less than any other non-xiaomi chinese phone but man oh man the compression is hideous. It seems only Xiaomi and Asus have nailed smartphone speakers but Vivo's getting closer. They just need slightly brighter speakers with less compression. I don't think the VIvo's "mid-centric", i think it'd be more accurate to say other phones lack mids. but the vivo also lacks lower mids so yeah, kinda weird lol

                                  why use the Wild Life Extreme stress test instead of the usual Wild Life stress test? If you WERE going to add it, why not just add the Wild Life stress test as well? Seems weird. In any case, the worst Wild Life Extreme run is better or equivalent to the SD 8 Gen 2, I think that is INSANE progress. Stability % matters, yes, but i mean, maintaining the SD 8 Gen 2 level peak power at worst? I think that's huge stuff.

                                  The main camera processing seems extra artificial this year, thanks to the smaller sensor. The 2x zoom shots are further proof of that. The UW cam is sad for the price and the telephoto is the only saving grace. But the 10x is surprisingly not that great.

                                  Dunno how to feel about this, this Vivo X phone excites in every aspect OTHER than the camera. Maybe updates will fix it but feels kinda underwhelming. Kudos to GSMArena for the relatively fast review

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • 0p}
                                    • 26 Oct 2024

                                    Those close-ups are amazing. I've never seen that quality from a smartphone camera.

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • 0p}
                                      • 26 Oct 2024

                                      ashrobb, 26 Oct 2024The telephoto is incredible. Bummer to see these sustained ... more4K video is much more
                                      This is why so many phones cannot even do 10 min.
                                      Few years ago, most had 5 min limit.

                                        The telephoto is incredible. Bummer to see these sustained test results, but as proven by geekerwan, the phone is amazing in prolonged gaming sessions. Maybe you guys should switch to or add a more real-world-like stress test. These synthetic stress tests are unrealistic, specially when gaming is the most demanding thing the majority of people do on a phone.