Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ hands-on review
- H
- Hemedans
- XKx
- 12 Dec 2024
Raiju92, 11 Dec 2024Whoever created this idea of s series chips should be banne... moreHow is 7s previous gen and low end garbage when it use Cortex A720? One of the best core out there when it come to perfomance and power usage?
- ?
- Anonymous
- XRx
- 12 Dec 2024
Pumpino, 11 Dec 2024Slower charging, outdated software, an underwhelming camera... morethe only xiaomi phones worth buying now are the poco f series and the main series with the caveat that you should get the previous year's flagship at a steep discount after a new one is released(and I'm still angry about how the custom rom scene for all android phones except pixels just died)
- ?
- Anonymous
- XRx
- 12 Dec 2024
"Xiaomi is also promising four years of fluency"
what is the purpose of this vague claim? did the author make it up? almost any midrange phone remains usable for 4 years with or without any updates
- David 040882
- srr
- 12 Dec 2024
Aierlan, 12 Dec 2024I feel these hands on reviews on Indian releases are more &... moreBut nowhere near as detailed and as thorough
- A
- Aierlan
- Eaj
- 12 Dec 2024
I feel these hands on reviews on Indian releases are more 'real' and less 'sugar coated' than the full reviews.
- y
- yjfoeg
- fCf
- 12 Dec 2024
The key selling point of this phone is the camera set up. If you want better chip and lose camera then go for Poco.
- ?
- Anonymous
- LfV
- 12 Dec 2024
1989, 12 Dec 2024Bloatware also increased with the price. Good going xiaomi.Wrong on price
- J
- JOY
- P@Q
- 12 Dec 2024
HyperOS needs to be more optimized, it's still too buggy, especially the RAM managemnt is horrible in chinese hyperOS. Moreover, notification issue is a pain in the ass. Xiaomi is really dissappointing us, plz fix all the issues with hyperOS, otherwise people will have to avoid your hyperS*it
- C
- Chief
- XEv
- 12 Dec 2024
NoOne75, 11 Dec 2024Still the same, cr@ppy 8 MP UWA cam, which is 4+ years old ... moreImpressive
- ?
- Anonymous
- LfV
- 12 Dec 2024
Anonymous, 12 Dec 2024Xiaomi is a past. I rly don't understand why people bu... moreLol
- ?
- Anonymous
- x{6
- 12 Dec 2024
Kinda prblematic what Redmi Note 14 Pro+ put UFS 2.2 and LPDDR4x for lower end config. And its too expensive
- ?
- Anonymous
- gnq
- 12 Dec 2024
Xiaomi is a past. I rly don't understand why people buying them. In first years they offered best for money can get. Now, they offer lesser then others for same or even higher price. Not to mention most unstable Hyper os, which drag user experience compared to others. Now they even removed charger in the box for global users, except Asia. So what is Xiaomi advantage now? Nothing.
- J
- Jab
- MNq
- 11 Dec 2024
Please test if the phone has aptx lossless. It is easy. If you can set it to aptX Adaptive on 44.1 kHz sampling rate and 16-bit depth, than aptx lossless is present. Easy, right? Then do it with every Snapdragon smartphone! Ffs we live in the age of bluetooth headphones (and dozens of them already support aptx lossless). Yet regarding soud quality you spend the time only on loudspeaker.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 7jZ
- 11 Dec 2024
It still has a plastic frame. So no for me
- N
- NoOne75
- HK4
- 11 Dec 2024
Still the same, cr@ppy 8 MP UWA cam, which is 4+ years old - this cam was already into my Redmi Note 9 Pro from March 2020, it does seem to be. I wished for at least the 12/13 MP UWA cam from the Xiaomi 13T/Pro, from last year. Unexciting. I say this as using Xiaomi phones since the Note 3 Pro.
- P
- Pumpino
- HXY
- 11 Dec 2024
Slower charging, outdated software, an underwhelming camera and a weak chip. Xiaomi should have used a more powerful MediaTek chip and used the savings to keep the faster charging. Not off to a good start when a device looks bad on paper.
- J
- JimmyTheGreatest
- SH7
- 11 Dec 2024
ashrobb, 11 Dec 2024I remember back then when the hands on for the Indian 13 Pr... moreToo much hot food maybe...
- R
- Raiju92
- XVg
- 11 Dec 2024
Whoever created this idea of s series chips should be banned.
7 and 7s Gen offer similar performance. However 7+ offers nearly 50% higher performance.
Then 7s are essentially previous gen low end garbage chips which are rechristened to sell them to unsuspecting customers.
There should be only one chip one generation. 3 or 4 series for low end, 5 or 6 series for mid end, 7 series for upper midrange and flagship killers and 8 series for flagship.
One processor name, one Gen no more s and + version naming crap.
- c
- cyber
- S2D
- 11 Dec 2024
note 13 pro plus seems like a better deal