Poco F7 Ultra review

27 March 2025


Sort by:

  • A
  • Alex
  • EDy
  • 27 Mar 2025

Anonymous, 27 Mar 2025Not them already having reviews AND battery result for a ph... moreSamsung phone like any other brands send. The phone with one month more quick. Don't speak what you don't know.

    • M
    • Madalin
    • ajW
    • 27 Mar 2025

    jiyen235, 27 Mar 2025the presence of the IQOO 13 nullifies this phone completely... moreThat phone is not available in Europe or us

      This excellent juggernaut of a smartphone is currently roughly the same price as iPhone 16e-waste, let that sink in...

        ishreal, 27 Mar 2025all companies send their products early to reviewers before... morexiaomi's phone got a faster review and a higher rating than a samsung one. This feels like a stab in the heart for a Samsung fan only comparable to a heart break.

          • ?
          • Anonymous
          • X}T
          • 27 Mar 2025

          David 040882, 27 Mar 2025That 8 Elite pushes the price a bit too high up. If they wa... morePoco f7 will come with 8s gen4

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • X}T
            • 27 Mar 2025

            jiyen235, 27 Mar 2025the presence of the IQOO 13 nullifies this phone completely... moreIqoo doesn't support bootloader unlocking while Poco does. So geeks will buy Poco over Iqoo

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • Uiv
              • 27 Mar 2025

              Anonymous, 27 Mar 2025Not them already having reviews AND battery result for a ph... moreYou do realize how wrong you are?

              Check all the YouTube video and unboxing that most reviewer did about a week ago. How did they do it before the phone is released? Xiaomi already sent them the phone in advance to showcase by doing unboxing and share basic info. They had embargo in place so they could not reveal benchmark and battery test. Since the phone is now officially unveiled now they can publish the result.

              Check gsmarena post itself. Even they got the phone about a week early before launch. So plenty of time to test and share the info as soon as the embargo lifted.

                • ?
                • Anonymous
                • Ndw
                • 27 Mar 2025

                aReefer, 27 Mar 2025It would he be nice if you mentioned the battery chemistry ... moreSilicon batteries are less durable, they last for fewer cycles

                  Anonymous, 27 Mar 2025Not them already having reviews AND battery result for a ph... moreall companies send their products early to reviewers before launch. Samsung does this too and GSMA always makes it upfront knowledge if something is a promo or ad. why are you being a hater?

                    Almost all companies are doing this one thing very wrong: Why would I need a (mediocre or outright subpar) 15mm UWA beside a 23mm WA lens? The gap in focal range is way too small in order to justify two camera modules.

                    In order for an UWA to be meaningful, we would have to set the focal lenghts much more apart from each other, eg. 12 mm UWA vs 28 mm WA. Now, that would make some sense. But 15 mmg vs 23 mm is just wasted money.

                      jiyen235, 27 Mar 2025the presence of the IQOO 13 nullifies this phone completely... more13,2 ev they mention is actually dcg mode sensor dynamic range of ov50e

                        • ?
                        • Anonymous
                        • I@H
                        • 27 Mar 2025

                        Not them already having reviews AND battery result for a phone that just GOT announced. See how late they review Samsung phones. More proof Xiaomi is paying reviewers. 🤦

                          the presence of the IQOO 13 nullifies this phone completely. In no way whatsoever is this even remotely better than that phone apart from design/UI which are subjective and the 2.5x camera which doesn't matter as much for a performance phone.

                          Better battery, better speakers, better thermals, better software and a more "reliable" photography kit on the IQOO. I must say, the 2.5x is genuinely great on the Poco, but who really cares about the telephoto cam when everything else is worse?

                          Imagine buying a performance phone for its camera, lmao.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • MpL
                            • 27 Mar 2025

                            This pictures looks better than Samsung S series :O Samsung whats wrong with You

                              It would he be nice if you mentioned the battery chemistry on the regular in these reviews, as this may impact any phones longevity. I assume it's carbon silicon? Nice to know if the battery will live long enough to see all the android versions it's supposed to receive.

                              In the photo comparisons in the article, in some sections the author refers to the phone as a "Poco 7 Pro", which is obviously a mistake that requires correction.

                              It would also be interesting to include the X7 Pro results in some of the performance benchmarks I think, for those looking at compromising a little more, but that's just a suggestion.

                              So far, for me at least, the F7 Pro or even the X7 Pro may be more compelling and better value with relatively few critical compromises in the Poco sphere, but that's just my opinion. Better value may possibly be found in other brands today, depending on people's subjective priorities of course.

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • mri
                                • 27 Mar 2025

                                its funny how they boasted about super ultra cooling solution and it still throttles to 50%, they are shameless.

                                  Bad sustained performance ruined whole experience. They should focus more on thermal throttling. There's no the point to put 8 Elite when it losing 50% of it's power. The rest of the phone is very good

                                    That was better than I expected. After it drops in price in a few months it can be a very good pick.

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • 3cH
                                      • 27 Mar 2025

                                      Awful processing on the photos.

                                        • J
                                        • Jakob
                                        • ndi
                                        • 27 Mar 2025

                                        main camera of Ultra is same as last year "Pro" which was "decent" back then. Nice try with the branding Xiaomi but its a hard pass for me.

                                          5 of 6